skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: PEEM‐iv vs hu‐scan: case study for graphene folds on SiO2.

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:
 [1]
  1. Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Basic Energy Sciences (BES) (SC-22)
OSTI Identifier:
1346336
Report Number(s):
SAND-2017-2314R
651349
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
36 MATERIALS SCIENCE

Citation Formats

Ohta, Taisuke. PEEM‐iv vs hu‐scan: case study for graphene folds on SiO2.. United States: N. p., 2017. Web. doi:10.2172/1346336.
Ohta, Taisuke. PEEM‐iv vs hu‐scan: case study for graphene folds on SiO2.. United States. doi:10.2172/1346336.
Ohta, Taisuke. Wed . "PEEM‐iv vs hu‐scan: case study for graphene folds on SiO2.". United States. doi:10.2172/1346336. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1346336.
@article{osti_1346336,
title = {PEEM‐iv vs hu‐scan: case study for graphene folds on SiO2.},
author = {Ohta, Taisuke},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {10.2172/1346336},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Wed Mar 01 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • Abstract not provided.
  • Seismic reflection data purchased from petroleum industry brokers and acquired through group speculative surveys were interpreted for information on the regional subsurface geologic structure and stratigraphy within and surrounding the Davis and Lavender Canyons study area in the Paradox Basin of southeastern Utah. Structures of interest were faults, folds, joints, and collapse structures related to salt dissolution. The seismic reflection data were used to interpret stratigraphy by identifying continuous and discontinuous reflectors on the seismic profiles. Thickening and thinning of strata and possible areas of salt flowage or dissolution could be identified from the seismic data. Identifiable reflectors included themore » tops of the Precambrian and Mississippian, a distinctive interbed close to the middle of the Pennsylvanian Paradox salt formation (probably the interval between Salt Cycles 10 and 13), and near the top of the Paradox salt. Of the 56 faults identified from the seismic reflection interpretation, 33 trend northwest, west-northwest, or west, and most affect only the deeper part of the stratigraphic section. These faults are part of the deep structural system found throughout the Paradox Basin, including the fold and fault belt in the northeast part of the basin. The faults bound basement Precambrian blocks that experienced minor activity during Mississippian and early Pennsylvanian deposition, and showed major displacement during early Paradox salt deposition as the Paradox Basin subsided. Based on the seismic data, most of these faults appear to have an upward terminus between the top of the Mississippian and the salt interbed reflector.« less
  • The Illinois Coal Market Flexibility Sensitivity Case will utilize partial oxidation of about one half of the vacuum pipestill bottoms for hydrogen generation and FLEXICOKING of the remaining bottoms to make low Btu gas for use as plant fuel. Partial oxidation replaces steam reforming of methane, ethane and propane used in the Illinois Base Case to generate hydrogen. The methane/ethane product released by elimination of steam reforming will be sold as high Btu gas. HBG will also serve as backup fuel for the onsite area. The offsite design will be developed in considerably less depth and detail than for themore » Illinois Base Case. Wherever possible, the Base Case design will be used to develop the offsite design for the Sensitivity Case. The offsite design effort will be concentrated on the fuel, steam, water and power systems and solid wastes transport facilities. There will be minimum design efforts (i.e., hold constant, prorate, or use judgement relative to the Base Case) on the remainder of the offsites.« less