skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Committee ARM User Executive Committee Meeting Summary March 30-31, 2016

Abstract

This meeting was held at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesa Lab, Boulder, Colorado. Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility User Executive Committee (UEC) members present were: Chuck Long, Ernie Lewis, Larry Berg, Hailong Wang, Matt Shupe, Andrew Gettelman, and Dave Turner. Rob Wood joined the discussion at several points via conference call, as he was unable to attend in person. Gannet Hallar and Pavlos Kollias were unable to attend. ARM Infrastructure members present were: Jim Mather, Jennifer Comstock, Jimmy Voyles, Ken Kehoe, Doug Sisterson, Hanna Goss, and Giri Prakash. The ARM UEC met face to face for the first time since the committee was formed in December, 2014 at the NCAR Mesa Lab in Boulder. Prior to this point, all UEC meetings were done via telephone, usually with the aid of collaboration software (e.g., Lync, GoToMeeting) allowing the entire committee to see a common presentation. These conference calls covered a wide range of topics, many of them on a recurrent basis; however, since the calls were limited to less than 90 minutes it was felt that a more dedicated meeting would allow us to delve more deeply into some of these topics. Three topics for thismore » meeting came from previous conference call discussions: (1) data quality, (2) uncertainty quantification, and (3) improved communications. Two other topics were discussed during this meeting: (4) an overview of the LES (large-eddy simulation) ARM Symbiotic Simulation and Observation (LASSO) project and (5) the process for electing new UEC members. Summaries of each of these topics are provided below, along with recommendations that the UEC feels should be considered by the ARM Facility (which will be highlighted using italics).« less

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility, Washington, DC (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER) (SC-23)
OSTI Identifier:
1343612
Report Number(s):
DOE/SC-ARM-17-002
DOE Contract Number:
AC05-7601830
Resource Type:
Program Document
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; User Executive Committee; data quality; ARM Mobile Facility; Value-Added Products; uncertainty quantification; LASSO Project

Citation Formats

None, None. Committee ARM User Executive Committee Meeting Summary March 30-31, 2016. United States: N. p., 2017. Web.
None, None. Committee ARM User Executive Committee Meeting Summary March 30-31, 2016. United States.
None, None. Sun . "Committee ARM User Executive Committee Meeting Summary March 30-31, 2016". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1343612.
@article{osti_1343612,
title = {Committee ARM User Executive Committee Meeting Summary March 30-31, 2016},
author = {None, None},
abstractNote = {This meeting was held at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) Mesa Lab, Boulder, Colorado. Atmospheric Radiation Measurement (ARM) Climate Research Facility User Executive Committee (UEC) members present were: Chuck Long, Ernie Lewis, Larry Berg, Hailong Wang, Matt Shupe, Andrew Gettelman, and Dave Turner. Rob Wood joined the discussion at several points via conference call, as he was unable to attend in person. Gannet Hallar and Pavlos Kollias were unable to attend. ARM Infrastructure members present were: Jim Mather, Jennifer Comstock, Jimmy Voyles, Ken Kehoe, Doug Sisterson, Hanna Goss, and Giri Prakash. The ARM UEC met face to face for the first time since the committee was formed in December, 2014 at the NCAR Mesa Lab in Boulder. Prior to this point, all UEC meetings were done via telephone, usually with the aid of collaboration software (e.g., Lync, GoToMeeting) allowing the entire committee to see a common presentation. These conference calls covered a wide range of topics, many of them on a recurrent basis; however, since the calls were limited to less than 90 minutes it was felt that a more dedicated meeting would allow us to delve more deeply into some of these topics. Three topics for this meeting came from previous conference call discussions: (1) data quality, (2) uncertainty quantification, and (3) improved communications. Two other topics were discussed during this meeting: (4) an overview of the LES (large-eddy simulation) ARM Symbiotic Simulation and Observation (LASSO) project and (5) the process for electing new UEC members. Summaries of each of these topics are provided below, along with recommendations that the UEC feels should be considered by the ARM Facility (which will be highlighted using italics).},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2017},
month = {Sun Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2017}
}

Program Document:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that may hold this item.

Save / Share:
  • The Energy Security Act of 1980 established a program to provide financial assistance to private industry in the construction and operation of commercial-scale synthetic fuels plants. The Dow Syngas Project design has a high-temperature entrained-flow slagging-type gasifier, which began operation in 1987. Dow agreed to comply with existing environmental regulations and to develop an Environmental Monitoring Plan (EMP) incorporating supplemental monitoring in areas of potential environmental and health concern, relative to synthetic fuels facilities. The two phases of monitoring in the EMP tests parameters of interest in air, water and solid waste to establish a data base of information thatmore » can be applied to resolving uncertainties relative to replication of synthetic fuels plants.« less
  • This is the Executive Summary of the first meeting of the High Altitude Pollution Program Scientific Advisory Committee which met in Washington, D.C. from November 29-December 1, 1978. The Committee is composed of 25 members who are experts in a number of fields related to atmospheric chemistry and physics, aviation, and engineering.
  • This report is an account of work sponsored by the Governments of Belgium, Canada, France, the Federal Republic of Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and the United States, and by the Commission of the European Communities, in the framework of the OECD/NEA Coordinated Programme on the Subseabed Disposal of Radioactive Waste. Neither the Governments of the Participating Countries, nor the Commission of the European Communities nor the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, nor any of their employees or representatives, assume any legal liability for the contents hereof. The objective of the NEA Coordinated Programme is to provide anmore » international assessment of the technical feasibility and long term safety of seabed disposal of high-level radioactive waste as a multi-media concept with marine sediments as the primary isolation barrier. Additional information on the Coordinated programme may be obtained from the various research establishments involved or the OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 38 boulevard Suchet, 75016 Paris, France.« less
  • Federal regulations impose financial penalties and credits on automobile manufacturers based upon 0.1 mpg increments in their Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) values for each model year. CAFE values are defined legally by a set of sampling and estimation procedures that neglect inherent uncertainties. This report characterizes alternative statistical procedures to quantify the inherent uncertainties in average fuel economy and examines their cost-effectiveness in achieving 0.1 mpg precision.
  • R&D activities have demonstrated Catalytic Extraction Processing (CEP) to be a robust, one-step process process that is relatively insensitive to wide variations in waste composition and is applicable to a broad spectrum of DOE wastes. The feed size and composition compatible with CEP have been increased in a short period of time, and additional R&D should lead to the ability to accept a drum (and larger?) size feed of completely uncharacterized waste. Experiments have validated the CPU (Catalytic Processing Unit). Two commercial facilities have been commissioned and are currently processing mixed low level wastes. Expansion of CEP to transuranic andmore » high level wastes should be the next step in the development and deployment of CEP for recycle, reuse, and disposal of materials from DOE decontamination and decommissioning activities.« less