skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: On the equivalence of experimental B(E2) values determined by various techniques

Abstract

In this paper, we establish the equivalence of the various techniques for measuring B(E2) values using a statistical analysis. Data used in this work come from the recent compilation by B. Pritychenko et al. (2016). We consider only those nuclei for which the B(E2) values were measured by at least two different methods, with each method being independently performed at least twice. Our results indicate that most prevalent methods of measuring B(E2) values are equivalent, with some weak evidence that Doppler-shift attenuation method (DSAM) measurements may differ from Coulomb excitation (CE) and nuclear resonance fluorescence (NRF) measurements. However, such an evidence appears to arise from discrepant DSAM measurements of the lifetimes for 60Ni and some Sn nuclei rather than a systematic deviation in the method itself.

Authors:
 [1]; ORCiD logo [2];  [1]
  1. McMaster Univ., Hamilton, ON (Canada). Department of Physics & Astronomy
  2. Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States). National Nuclear Data Center
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC), Nuclear Physics (NP) (SC-26)
OSTI Identifier:
1336052
Report Number(s):
BNL-112371-2016-JA
Journal ID: ISSN 0375-9474
Grant/Contract Number:
SC0012704; AC02-98CH10886
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Nuclear Physics. A
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 955; Journal ID: ISSN 0375-9474
Publisher:
Elsevier
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; Reduced transition probabilities; Nuclear data analysis; Coulomb excitation

Citation Formats

Birch, M., Pritychenko, B., and Singh, B. On the equivalence of experimental B(E2) values determined by various techniques. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.06.012.
Birch, M., Pritychenko, B., & Singh, B. On the equivalence of experimental B(E2) values determined by various techniques. United States. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.06.012.
Birch, M., Pritychenko, B., and Singh, B. 2016. "On the equivalence of experimental B(E2) values determined by various techniques". United States. doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.06.012. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1336052.
@article{osti_1336052,
title = {On the equivalence of experimental B(E2) values determined by various techniques},
author = {Birch, M. and Pritychenko, B. and Singh, B.},
abstractNote = {In this paper, we establish the equivalence of the various techniques for measuring B(E2) values using a statistical analysis. Data used in this work come from the recent compilation by B. Pritychenko et al. (2016). We consider only those nuclei for which the B(E2) values were measured by at least two different methods, with each method being independently performed at least twice. Our results indicate that most prevalent methods of measuring B(E2) values are equivalent, with some weak evidence that Doppler-shift attenuation method (DSAM) measurements may differ from Coulomb excitation (CE) and nuclear resonance fluorescence (NRF) measurements. However, such an evidence appears to arise from discrepant DSAM measurements of the lifetimes for 60Ni and some Sn nuclei rather than a systematic deviation in the method itself.},
doi = {10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2016.06.012},
journal = {Nuclear Physics. A},
number = ,
volume = 955,
place = {United States},
year = 2016,
month = 6
}

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 2works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share: