DYNA3D/ParaDyn Regression Test Suite Inventory
Abstract
The following table constitutes an initial assessment of feature coverage across the regression test suite used for DYNA3D and ParaDyn. It documents the regression test suite at the time of preliminary release 16.1 in September 2016. The columns of the table represent groupings of functionalities, e.g., material models. Each problem in the test suite is represented by a row in the table. All features exercised by the problem are denoted by a check mark (√) in the corresponding column. The definition of “feature” has not been subdivided to its smallest unit of user input, e.g., algorithmic parameters specific to a particular type of contact surface. This represents a judgment to provide code developers and users a reasonable impression of feature coverage without expanding the width of the table by several multiples. All regression testing is run in parallel, typically with eight processors, except problems involving features only available in serial mode. Many are strictly regression tests acting as a check that the codes continue to produce adequately repeatable results as development unfolds; compilers change and platforms are replaced. A subset of the tests represents true verification problems that have been checked against analytical or other benchmark solutions. Users are welcomedmore »
 Authors:
 Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
 Publication Date:
 Research Org.:
 Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
 Sponsoring Org.:
 USDOE
 OSTI Identifier:
 1331455
 Report Number(s):
 LLNLTR704102
 DOE Contract Number:
 AC5207NA27344
 Resource Type:
 Technical Report
 Country of Publication:
 United States
 Language:
 English
 Subject:
 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING
Citation Formats
Lin, Jerry I. DYNA3D/ParaDyn Regression Test Suite Inventory. United States: N. p., 2016.
Web. doi:10.2172/1331455.
Lin, Jerry I. DYNA3D/ParaDyn Regression Test Suite Inventory. United States. doi:10.2172/1331455.
Lin, Jerry I. 2016.
"DYNA3D/ParaDyn Regression Test Suite Inventory". United States.
doi:10.2172/1331455. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1331455.
@article{osti_1331455,
title = {DYNA3D/ParaDyn Regression Test Suite Inventory},
author = {Lin, Jerry I.},
abstractNote = {The following table constitutes an initial assessment of feature coverage across the regression test suite used for DYNA3D and ParaDyn. It documents the regression test suite at the time of preliminary release 16.1 in September 2016. The columns of the table represent groupings of functionalities, e.g., material models. Each problem in the test suite is represented by a row in the table. All features exercised by the problem are denoted by a check mark (√) in the corresponding column. The definition of “feature” has not been subdivided to its smallest unit of user input, e.g., algorithmic parameters specific to a particular type of contact surface. This represents a judgment to provide code developers and users a reasonable impression of feature coverage without expanding the width of the table by several multiples. All regression testing is run in parallel, typically with eight processors, except problems involving features only available in serial mode. Many are strictly regression tests acting as a check that the codes continue to produce adequately repeatable results as development unfolds; compilers change and platforms are replaced. A subset of the tests represents true verification problems that have been checked against analytical or other benchmark solutions. Users are welcomed to submit documented problems for inclusion in the test suite, especially if they are heavily exercising, and dependent upon, features that are currently underrepresented.},
doi = {10.2172/1331455},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2016,
month = 9
}

The following table constitutes an initial assessment of feature coverage across the regression test suite used for DYNA3D and ParaDyn. It documents the regression test suite at the time of production release 10.1 in September 2010. The columns of the table represent groupings of functionalities, e.g., material models. Each problem in the test suite is represented by a row in the table. All features exercised by the problem are denoted by a check mark in the corresponding column. The definition of ''feature'' has not been subdivided to its smallest unit of user input, e.g., algorithmic parameters specific to a particularmore »

EquationofState Test Suite for the DYNA3D Code
This document describes the creation and implementation of a test suite for the Equationof State models in the DYNA3D code. A customized input deck has been created for each model, as well as a script that extracts the relevant data from the highspeed edit file created by DYNA3D. Each equationofstate model is broken apart and individual elements of the model are tested, as well as testing the entire model. The input deck for each model is described and the results of the tests are discussed. The intent of this work is to add this test suite to the validation suitemore » 
Summary of Documentation for DYNA3DParaDyn's Software Quality Assurance Regression Test Problems
The Software Quality Assurance (SQA) regression test suite for DYNA3D (Zywicz and Lin, 2015) and ParaDyn (DeGroot, et al., 2015) currently contains approximately 600 problems divided into 21 suites, and is a required component of ParaDyn’s SQA plan (Ferencz and Oliver, 2013). The regression suite allows developers to ensure that software modifications do not unintentionally alter the code response. The entire regression suite is run prior to permanently incorporating any software modification or addition. When code modifications alter test problem results, the specific cause must be determined and fully understood before the software changes and revised test answers can bemore » 
Shell Element Verification & Regression Problems for DYNA3D
A series of quasistatic regression/verification problems were developed for the triangular and quadrilateral shell element formulations contained in Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory's explicit finite element program DYNA3D. Each regression problem imposes both displacement and forcetype boundary conditions to probe the five independent nodal degrees of freedom employed in the targeted formulation. When applicable, the finite element results are compared with smallstrain linearelastic closedform reference solutions to verify select aspects of the formulations implementation. Although all problems in the suite depict the same geometry, material behavior, and loading conditions, each problem represents a unique combination of shell formulation, stabilization method, andmore » 
DYNA3D Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions  Test Problems
Two verification problems were developed to test nonreflecting boundary segments in DYNA3D (Whirley and Engelmann, 1993). The problems simulate 1D wave propagation in a semiinfinite rod using a finite length rod and nonreflecting boundary conditions. One problem examines pure pressure wave propagation, and the other problem explores pure shear wave propagation. In both problems the nonreflecting boundary segments yield results that differ only slightly (less than 6%) during a short duration from their corresponding theoretical solutions. The errors appear to be due to the inability to generate a true stepfunction compressive wave in the pressure wave propagation problem and duemore »