skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Improving Materials Accountancy for Reprocessing using hiRX.

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (NA-20)
OSTI Identifier:
1315226
Report Number(s):
SAND2014-17297C
537330
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Proposed for presentation at the IAEA Safeguards Symposium held October 20-24, 2014 in Vienna, Austria.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Cipiti, Benjamin B. Improving Materials Accountancy for Reprocessing using hiRX.. United States: N. p., 2014. Web.
Cipiti, Benjamin B. Improving Materials Accountancy for Reprocessing using hiRX.. United States.
Cipiti, Benjamin B. Mon . "Improving Materials Accountancy for Reprocessing using hiRX.". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1315226.
@article{osti_1315226,
title = {Improving Materials Accountancy for Reprocessing using hiRX.},
author = {Cipiti, Benjamin B.},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014},
month = {Mon Sep 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • During the 1970's the IAEA gave considerable attention to the question of what its quantitative goals should be. These discussions led, in January 1980, to a set of provisional guidelines which considered both abrupt and protracted diversion possibilities. In a search for an effective means of achieving these goals at large bulk processing facilities, two technological concepts have been put forward. One concept, commonly referred to as near-real-time materials accountancy, is reviewed in this paper. 9 refs.
  • The controlled-potential coulometry has been adopted for plutonium product accountancy analysis at the Tokai reprocessing plant since 1985. The reliability of plutonium product analysis has been improved by introducing this method which is capable of better precision than the titration that was previously used. It has been found that the impurities such as neptunium, chromium and americium, which are thought to interfere with AgO-Fe(II)-Cr(VI) titration method, do not affect the controlled-potential coulometry. Iron, which is regarded as an impurity interfering with the coulometry, is corrected with simple measurement procedure using spectrophotometer. The fully automated coulometry system has been developed basedmore » on the experience of using manually operated system. The system consists of two symmetric parts. Each has one measurement position and one electrode washing position and is designed to load up to six cells. The system is calibrated with iron standard sample, because no significant difference between calibrations using metallic standard of plutonium and that of iron has been found. Precision of the automated system is within 0.1%.« less
  • In the framework of near-real-time accountancy for nuclear materials, safeguards statistical analysis based on the operator's data of a sequence of materials balance periods has been performed. Up to now, it is assumed that the operator's data are correct. A statistical model is presented that enables inspector verification measurements for a sequence of accounting periods to be included into a safeguards procedure. The analysis uses a two balance period and statistical concepts which are applied in the case of one accounting period. The interconnection of different safeguards measures shall be studied to get a basic idea about the procedure andmore » it is shown that there might be fundamental differences to the one balance case.« less