skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Mesa Construction Safety Statistics.

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1264548
Report Number(s):
SAND2006-2875C
525678
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Proposed for presentation at the Mesa Construction Safety held June 6, 2006 in Germantown, MD.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Strosinski, Micheal Vernon. Mesa Construction Safety Statistics.. United States: N. p., 2006. Web.
Strosinski, Micheal Vernon. Mesa Construction Safety Statistics.. United States.
Strosinski, Micheal Vernon. Mon . "Mesa Construction Safety Statistics.". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1264548.
@article{osti_1264548,
title = {Mesa Construction Safety Statistics.},
author = {Strosinski, Micheal Vernon},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2006},
month = {Mon May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2006}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • No abstract prepared.
  • No abstract prepared.
  • Results of a comparative analysis of actual vs. estimated uncertainty in several data sets derived from natural and social sciences are presented. Data sets include: (i) time trends in the sequential measurements of the same physical quantity; (ii) environmental measurements of uranium in soil, (iii) national population projections; (iv) projections for the United States` energy sector. Probabilities of large deviations from the true values are parametrized by an exponential distribution with the slope determined by the data. One can hedge against unsuspected uncertainties by inflating reported uncertainty range by a default safety factor determined from the relevant historical data sets.more » This emperical approach can be used in the uncertainty analysis of the low probability/high consequence events, such as risk of global warming.« less
  • In 1988, since the revision of the 10 CFR50.46, the best estimate codes may be used in safety demonstration and licensing, provided that uncertainties are added to the relevant output parameters before comparing them with the acceptance criteria. The uncertainty of output parameters is coming principally from the lack of knowledge of the input parameters (initial and boundary conditions of the calculated transient, empirical models of the code, etc.). In the safety analysis of the large break loss of coolant accident (LB-LOCA), for a best-estimate analysis, it was decided that the acceptance criteria should not be exceeded by the 95.more » percentile estimated with a high degree of confidence. Best-estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) analysis of the LB-LOCA allows significant margin gains. Therefore the nuclear industry develops and uses widely this type of analysis for power up-rating, longer fuel cycles, fuel design etc. It appeared necessary to IRSN, technical support of the French Safety Authority, to get more insight to these strategies. The assessment of the 95. percentile can be made in three steps: The definition and the evaluation of uncertainties of the input parameters. The modelling and understanding of the output parameters. The evaluation of the 95. percentile with a high degree of confidence. This paper presents and shows two new methods of how to deal with the third point. The standard approach is the use of a non-parametric approach called the Wilks' formula which requires only 59 calculations to get a majorant of the 95. percentile with a 95% degree of confidence. This method was applied in the 90's when the calculation resources were not sufficient to perform many calculations in a reasonable time. However, at the present time, the growth of computer power and the fall in prices allow to run many more calculations in the same physical time. We propose to use rank statistics or bootstrap to estimate the 95. percentile with a high confidence level, using some hundreds of calculations. This paper presents the results of the LOFT (Loss-of-Fluid Test) loss of coolant experiment L2-5 using these new methodologies. LOFT L2-5 was the subject of the former ISP 13 and the ongoing BEMUSE international problem. The output parameter is the second maximum peak cladding temperature of the fuel. The best estimate code used is CATHARE2 V2.5. Rank statistics and bootstrap improve the information on the estimation of the 95. percentile: a higher degree of confidence, a more precise estimation etc. (authors)« less