skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Emitter/absorber interface of CdTe solar cells

Journal Article · · Journal of Applied Physics
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4953820· OSTI ID:1257658
 [1];  [2];  [1]
  1. Physics Department, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523, USA
  2. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA

The performance of CdTe solar cells can be very sensitive to the emitter/absorber interface, especially for high-efficiency cells with high bulk lifetime. Performance losses from acceptor-type interface defects can be significant when interface defect states are located near mid-gap energies. Numerical simulations show that the emitter/absorber band alignment, the emitter doping and thickness, and the defect properties of the interface (i.e., defect density, defect type, and defect energy) can all play significant roles in the interface recombination. In particular, a type I heterojunction with small conduction-band offset (0.1 eV ≤ ΔEC ≤ 0.3 eV) can help maintain good cell efficiency in spite of high interface defect density, much like with Cu(In,Ga)Se2 (CIGS) cells. The basic principle is that positive ΔEC, often referred to as a “spike,” creates an absorber inversion and hence a large hole barrier adjacent to the interface. As a result, the electron-hole recombination is suppressed due to an insufficient hole supply at the interface. A large spike (ΔEC ≥ 0.4 eV), however, can impede electron transport and lead to a reduction of photocurrent and fill-factor. In contrast to the spike, a “cliff” (ΔEC < 0 eV) allows high hole concentration in the vicinity of the interface, which will assist interface recombination and result in a reduced open-circuit voltage. Another way to mitigate performance losses due to interface defects is to use a thin and highly doped emitter, which can invert the absorber and form a large hole barrier at the interface. CdS is the most common emitter material used in CdTe solar cells, but the CdS/CdTe interface is in the cliff category and is not favorable from the band-offset perspective. The ΔEC of other n-type emitter choices, such as (Mg,Zn)O, Cd(S,O), or (Cd,Mg)Te, can be tuned by varying the elemental ratio for an optimal positive value of ΔEC. As a result, these materials are predicted to yield higher voltages and would therefore be better candidates for the CdTe-cell emitter.

Research Organization:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), Renewable Power Office. Solar Energy Technologies Office; U.S. Department of Energy SunShot program
Grant/Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308; UGA-0-41027-18
OSTI ID:
1257658
Alternate ID(s):
OSTI ID: 1257863; OSTI ID: 1270791
Report Number(s):
NREL/JA-5K00-66287; JAPIAU; 10.1063/1.4953820
Journal Information:
Journal of Applied Physics, Journal Name: Journal of Applied Physics Vol. 119 Journal Issue: 23; ISSN 0021-8979
Publisher:
American Institute of Physics (AIP)Copyright Statement
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 124 works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (25)

Status and Potential of CdTe Solar-Cell Efficiency journal July 2015
First-principles calculation of band offsets, optical bowings, and defects in CdS, CdSe, CdTe, and their alloys journal February 2000
Theoretical analysis of the effect of conduction band offset of window/CIS layers on performance of CIS solar cells using device simulation journal March 2001
Strategies to increase CdTe solar-cell voltage journal May 2007
Exploring the potential for high-quality epitaxial CdTe solar cells conference June 2014
Modelling polycrystalline semiconductor solar cells journal February 2000
Efficiency limitations for wide-band-gap chalcopyrite solar cells journal June 2005
Design of energy band alignment at the Zn1−xMgxO/Cu(In,Ga)Se2 interface for Cd-free Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells journal January 2012
Silicon solar cells book January 1983
Conduction-Band-Offset Rule Governing J-V Distortion in CdS/CI(G)S Solar Cells journal January 2005
High-efficiency polycrystalline CdTe thin-film solar cells journal December 2004
27.6% Conversion efficiency, a new record for single-junction solar cells under 1 sun illumination conference June 2011
Improved Photocurrent in Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 Solar Cells: From 20.8% to 21.7% Efficiency with CdS Buffer and 21.0% Cd-Free journal September 2015
Interface-Barrier-Induced J–V Distortion of CIGS Cells With Sputtered-Deposited Zn(S,O) Window Layers journal May 2014
Optimization of CdTe thin-film solar cell efficiency using a sputtered, oxygenated CdS window layer: Optimization of CdTe thin-film solar cell efficiency using a sputtered, oxygenated CdS window layer
  • Kephart, Jason M.; Geisthardt, Russell M.; Sampath, W. S.
  • Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, Vol. 23, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2578
journal January 2015
CdTe solar cells with open-circuit voltage breaking the 1 V barrier journal February 2016
Influence of Mg content on the band alignment at CdS∕(Zn,Mg)O interfaces journal July 2005
Research strategies toward improving thin-film CdTe photovoltaic devices beyond 20% conversion efficiency journal December 2013
Activation energy of heterojunction diode currents in the limit of interface recombination journal May 2009
Quantification of losses in thin-film CdS/CdTe solar cells conference January 2005
Choice of substrate material for epitaxial CdTe solar cells conference June 2015
The study of composition non-uniformity in ternary Mg x Zn x O thin films journal July 2003
Interface recombination in heterojunction solar cells: Influence of buffer layer thickness journal April 2011
Design of Epitaxial CdTe Solar Cells on InSb Substrates journal November 2015
CdTe Solar Cells at the Threshold to 20% Efficiency journal October 2013