skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Mathematical modeling of production and biorefinery of energy crops

; ; ;
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
OSTI Identifier:
Grant/Contract Number:
EE0003138; 1242152
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 43; Journal Issue: C; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2016-09-06 06:16:50; Journal ID: ISSN 1364-0321
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom

Citation Formats

Wang, Lijun, Agyemang, Samuel A., Amini, Hossein, and Shahbazi, Abolghasem. Mathematical modeling of production and biorefinery of energy crops. United Kingdom: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.008.
Wang, Lijun, Agyemang, Samuel A., Amini, Hossein, & Shahbazi, Abolghasem. Mathematical modeling of production and biorefinery of energy crops. United Kingdom. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.008.
Wang, Lijun, Agyemang, Samuel A., Amini, Hossein, and Shahbazi, Abolghasem. 2015. "Mathematical modeling of production and biorefinery of energy crops". United Kingdom. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.008.
title = {Mathematical modeling of production and biorefinery of energy crops},
author = {Wang, Lijun and Agyemang, Samuel A. and Amini, Hossein and Shahbazi, Abolghasem},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.008},
journal = {Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews},
number = C,
volume = 43,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = 2015,
month = 3

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record at 10.1016/j.rser.2014.11.008

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 4works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:
  • Pioneer cellulosic biorefineries across the United States rely on a conventional feedstock supply system based on one-year contracts with local growers, who harvest, locally store, and deliver feedstock in low-density format to the conversion facility. While the conventional system is designed for high biomass yield areas, pilot scale operations have experienced feedstock supply shortages and price volatilities due to reduced harvests and competition from other industries. Regional supply dependency and the inability to actively manage feedstock stability and quality, provide operational risks to the biorefinery, which translate into higher investment risk. The advanced feedstock supply system based on a networkmore » of depots can mitigate many of these risks and enable wider supply system benefits. This paper compares the two concepts from a system-level perspective beyond mere logistic costs. It shows that while processing operations at the depot increase feedstock supply costs initially, they enable wider system benefits including supply risk reduction (leading to lower interest rates on loans), industry scale-up, conversion yield improvements, and reduced handling equipment and storage costs at the biorefinery. When translating these benefits into cost reductions per liter of gasoline equivalent (LGE), we find that total cost reductions between –$0.46 to –$0.21 per LGE for biochemical and –$0.32 to –$0.12 per LGE for thermochemical conversion pathways are possible. Naturally, these system level benefits will differ between individual actors along the feedstock supply chain. Further research is required with respect to depot sizing, location, and ownership structures.« less
  • Developing oil and hydrocarbon producing crops requires a detailed conceptual framework including directions and goals for a long-range study. Based on the evaluation of about 300 plant species, a scenario has been developed for the introduction of these crops into the US agricultural scene. For oil- and hydrocarbon-producing crops, primarily processing plants (botanochemical plants) would be situated to handle crops grown within a 25 Km radius. Each plant would process 280,000-550,000 ton/year of whole-plant produce grown on about 24,500 ha of crop land. The product mix could be adapted to changing economic or social needs. Possible primary products would includemore » whole-plant oils, soluble polyphenols, rubber, gutta, cattle feed, high-protein feed and food supplements, papermaking fiber, glucose, xylose, fuel alcohols, methane and soil amendments. 14 references« less
  • Renewable energy sources, plant materials that can be processed into liquid fuels, are becoming increasingly important as fossil fuel sources dwindle and environmental impacts of releasing fossilized carbon into the atmosphere become more evident. But which plant species provide the most material and can be grown on land not used to produce food, feed, and fiber Switchgrass exceeds all other herbaceous species we have tested in production of biomass on marginal sites in the Virginia Piedmont reports David J. Parrish, Virginia Tech (Blacksburg, VA) professor of crop and soil environmental sciences. In a study sponsored by the U.S. Department ofmore » Energy (DOE) at Virginia Tech, graduate student Steven Nagle, Parrish, professor Dale Wolf, and associate professor W.L. Daniels are comparing the biomass productivity of switchgrass, weeping lovegrass, and tall fescue. Since 1985, the crops - selected for their marginal crop value - have been grown on 12 sites in the Virginia Piedmont. Planting was done using no-till procedures that slice but do not turn the soil, because the sites are subject to erosion. The two warm-season grasses are harvested once a year, the fescue twice. Switchgrass has been the most productive on clay soils, and lovegrass on sandy soil. In a second DOE-sponsored study - this one by graduate student Preston Sullivan, Parish, Wolf, Daniels, and Nagle - the Virginia Tech researchers have begun to investigate planting winter-annual legumes in with switchgrass as a source of nitrogen to reduce cost of production, and as a means to increase biomass. In the fall of 1988, crimson clover, arrowleaf clover, and hairy vetch were planted into the switchgrass stubble. Other plots of switchgrass are being provided with various levels of nitrogen fertilizer to compare those yields with legume-planted plots. Crimson clover had provided the most fall growth, but by mid-May 1989, the hairy vetch had produced a dense webbing of biomass over the new switchgrass.« less
  • Approximately one-fourth of the total energy requirement in the United States could be met by employing present farming techniques on idle lands to produce biomass and by utilizing biomass from agricultural wastes. Conversion of these agricultural materials to methane gas can be accomplished by the process of anaerobic digestion. It has been shown that the microbial reaction kinetics of this process can be approximated by a first order reaction based on carbon concentration. A specific rate constant of 0.086 days/sup -1/ has been determined for various agricultural materials. Bioconversion of plant matter to methane gas is economically attractive at today'smore » fossil fuel prices. Projections based on present technology show that a reasonable return could be expected for a 50 million cubic foot per day (Mscf/day) facility and a gas price of $2/Mscf. Further study should be concentrated on increasing reaction rates, and even better economics could result. 20 references, 2 figures, 2 tables.« less