skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: National geodatabase of ocean current power resource in USA

; ; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Sponsoring Org.:
OSTI Identifier:
Grant/Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Journal Article: Publisher's Accepted Manuscript
Journal Name:
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Additional Journal Information:
Journal Volume: 44; Journal Issue: C; Related Information: CHORUS Timestamp: 2016-09-06 06:33:13; Journal ID: ISSN 1364-0321
Country of Publication:
United Kingdom

Citation Formats

Yang, Xiufeng, Haas, Kevin A., Fritz, Hermann M., French, Steven P., Shi, Xuan, Neary, Vincent S., and Gunawan, Budi. National geodatabase of ocean current power resource in USA. United Kingdom: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.007.
Yang, Xiufeng, Haas, Kevin A., Fritz, Hermann M., French, Steven P., Shi, Xuan, Neary, Vincent S., & Gunawan, Budi. National geodatabase of ocean current power resource in USA. United Kingdom. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.007.
Yang, Xiufeng, Haas, Kevin A., Fritz, Hermann M., French, Steven P., Shi, Xuan, Neary, Vincent S., and Gunawan, Budi. 2015. "National geodatabase of ocean current power resource in USA". United Kingdom. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.007.
title = {National geodatabase of ocean current power resource in USA},
author = {Yang, Xiufeng and Haas, Kevin A. and Fritz, Hermann M. and French, Steven P. and Shi, Xuan and Neary, Vincent S. and Gunawan, Budi},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.007},
journal = {Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews},
number = C,
volume = 44,
place = {United Kingdom},
year = 2015,
month = 4

Journal Article:
Free Publicly Available Full Text
Publisher's Version of Record at 10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.007

Citation Metrics:
Cited by: 6works
Citation information provided by
Web of Science

Save / Share:
  • A geodatabase of tidal constituents is developed to present the regional assessment of tidal stream power resource in the USA. Tidal currents are numerically modeled with the Regional Ocean Modeling System (ROMS) and calibrated with the available measurements of tidal current speeds and water level surfaces. The performance of the numerical model in predicting the tidal currents and water levels is assessed by an independent validation. The geodatabase is published on a public domain via a spatial database engine with interactive tools to select, query and download the data. Regions with the maximum average kinetic power density exceeding 500 W/m2more » (corresponding to a current speed of ~1 m/s), total surface area larger than 0.5 km2 and depth greater than 5 m are defined as hotspots and documented. The regional assessment indicates that the state of Alaska (AK) has the largest number of locations with considerably high kinetic power density, followed by, Maine (ME), Washington (WA), Oregon (OR), California (CA), New Hampshire (NH), Massachusetts (MA), New York (NY), New Jersey (NJ), North and South Carolina (NC, SC), Georgia (GA), and Florida (FL).« less
  • The extension of coastal state jurisdiction to 200-nautical miles - a fact of international law about to receive juridical status - would lead to a unique situation in the ownership of ocean resources, viz. 15 coastal states would receive among them approximately 42% of the world's 200-mile economic zone area. At least 8 of these countries are less-developed coastal states (LDCS) which lack the key factors, capital, technology, and managerial skill, necessary to tap these resources. As a result, the reliance of the LDCS on marine multinational corporations will markedly increase since a significant part of marine technology exists inmore » the private sector. Concurrently, a dramatic rise in the control of coastal states over MNCs engaged in ocean resource development will occur. Thus, under the new regime of ocean resource management, the relationship between MNCs and nation-states is likely to be one of constructive partnership in development, rather than one of conflict and discord.« less
  • The distribution of wave energy and power as functions of longitude and latitude are presented for the Northern Hemisphere at 12Z, October 2, 1975. Both the large peak of the distribution in the Atlantic Ocean and the smaller peak in the Pacific Ocean are found to be at longitudes towards the eastern end of the ocean basins. This ''eastern accumulation'' of wave energy and power offers interesting contrast to the western intensification of currents. Distribution of wave power with latitude shows peaks of wave power in the mid-latitudes. The total surface wave energy in the seas of the world formore » the same time is estimated to be 1600 x 10/sup 15/ J. The corresponding total wave power estimate is 90 x 10/sup 15/ W. The rate of renewal of wave power is estimated to be 10/sup 12/--10/sup 13/ W, about the present level of world power consumption.« less
  • This article explores the inefficiencies of federal ocean resource management. First, a description of the Department of the Interior and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration provides an overview of administrative objectives in ocean-resource management. Second, a case study of the northern Channel Islands off the coast of California illustrates the conflicting goals of resource development and preservation. Such an examination reveals the inability of Interior and NOAA to efficiently resolve their conflicting management goals and demonstrates that balanced multiple use should be the paramount goal in federal ocean management.
  • The American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Resources (ANSI/ANS-5.1) was issued in 1979 and has been used extensively for the past decade. Since the standard was issued, there have been new decay-heat measurements, and new and improved calculational capabilities have been developed. In this article the standard is compared with these new data and with calculations based on improved methods. Three foreign standards or proposed standards have also been developed, and their contents are compared with the present American standard. Proposals for improving the standard are presented and discussed. 27 refs., 9 figs., 3 tabs.