skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: MCNP and GADRAS Comparisons

Abstract

To facilitate the timely execution of System Threat Reviews (STRs) for DNDO, and also to develop a methodology for performing STRs, LANL performed comparisons of several radiation transport codes (MCNP, GADRAS, and Gamma-Designer) that have been previously utilized to compute radiation signatures. While each of these codes has strengths, it is of paramount interest to determine the limitations of each of the respective codes and also to identify the most time efficient means by which to produce computational results, given the large number of parametric cases that are anticipated in performing STR's. These comparisons serve to identify regions of applicability for each code and provide estimates of uncertainty that may be anticipated. Furthermore, while performing these comparisons, examination of the sensitivity of the results to modeling assumptions was also examined. These investigations serve to enable the creation of the LANL methodology for performing STRs. Given the wide variety of radiation test sources, scenarios, and detectors, LANL calculated comparisons of the following parameters: decay data, multiplicity, device (n,γ) leakages, and radiation transport through representative scenes and shielding. This investigation was performed to understand potential limitations utilizing specific codes for different aspects of the STR challenges.

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1248125
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-16-22677
TRN: US1601259
DOE Contract Number:  
AC52-06NA25396
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
07 ISOTOPE AND RADIATION SOURCES; 73 NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND RADIATION PHYSICS; M CODES; G CODES; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; LANL; RADIATION TRANSPORT; NUCLEAR DECAY; DESIGN; NEUTRON LEAKAGE; MULTIPLICITY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHIELDING; COMPUTERIZED SIMULATION; MULTIPLICATION FACTORS; URANIUM; PLUTONIUM; GAMMA RADIATION; STAINLESS STEELS

Citation Formats

Klasky, Marc Louis, Myers, Steven Charles, James, Michael R., and Mayo, Douglas R.. MCNP and GADRAS Comparisons. United States: N. p., 2016. Web. doi:10.2172/1248125.
Klasky, Marc Louis, Myers, Steven Charles, James, Michael R., & Mayo, Douglas R.. MCNP and GADRAS Comparisons. United States. doi:10.2172/1248125.
Klasky, Marc Louis, Myers, Steven Charles, James, Michael R., and Mayo, Douglas R.. Tue . "MCNP and GADRAS Comparisons". United States. doi:10.2172/1248125. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1248125.
@article{osti_1248125,
title = {MCNP and GADRAS Comparisons},
author = {Klasky, Marc Louis and Myers, Steven Charles and James, Michael R. and Mayo, Douglas R.},
abstractNote = {To facilitate the timely execution of System Threat Reviews (STRs) for DNDO, and also to develop a methodology for performing STRs, LANL performed comparisons of several radiation transport codes (MCNP, GADRAS, and Gamma-Designer) that have been previously utilized to compute radiation signatures. While each of these codes has strengths, it is of paramount interest to determine the limitations of each of the respective codes and also to identify the most time efficient means by which to produce computational results, given the large number of parametric cases that are anticipated in performing STR's. These comparisons serve to identify regions of applicability for each code and provide estimates of uncertainty that may be anticipated. Furthermore, while performing these comparisons, examination of the sensitivity of the results to modeling assumptions was also examined. These investigations serve to enable the creation of the LANL methodology for performing STRs. Given the wide variety of radiation test sources, scenarios, and detectors, LANL calculated comparisons of the following parameters: decay data, multiplicity, device (n,γ) leakages, and radiation transport through representative scenes and shielding. This investigation was performed to understand potential limitations utilizing specific codes for different aspects of the STR challenges.},
doi = {10.2172/1248125},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Apr 19 00:00:00 EDT 2016},
month = {Tue Apr 19 00:00:00 EDT 2016}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share: