skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Peridynamics: Historical and future perspectives.


Abstract not provided.

Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Resource Relation:
Conference: Proposed for presentation at the Peridynamics MURI kickoff meeting held January 13-14, 2015 in Tucson, AZ.
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Silling, Stewart A. Peridynamics: Historical and future perspectives.. United States: N. p., 2015. Web.
Silling, Stewart A. Peridynamics: Historical and future perspectives.. United States.
Silling, Stewart A. 2015. "Peridynamics: Historical and future perspectives.". United States. doi:.
title = {Peridynamics: Historical and future perspectives.},
author = {Silling, Stewart A.},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2015,
month = 1

Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • This paper traces environmental engineering from its limited beginning in water- and vector-borne disease control to its current level of professional involvement. Environmental engineering has changed from a profession concerned primarily with the resolution of sanitation problems to a complex multidisciplinary enterprise embodying the complete spectrum of environmental effects on health and ecology. The modern activities of the profession embrace the full implementation of 21st century science to solve complex pollution problems and, perhaps equally important, involvement in the development of public policy. As more environmental issues surface, concerns about potential health problems increase. This paper directs attention to themore » changing characteristics of the profession, the management of the environmental movement, the needs of the environmental engineering profession, the effective application of scientific discoveries, the practice of engineering within a risk-sensitive society, and the development of a coordinated waste management methodology.« less
  • Unawareness of the health risks of beryllium resulted in a decade of unmitigated exposure of several thousand workers and numerous cases of beryllium disease in employees and nearby residents. Subsequent adoption of exposure limits and their implementation with effective technical controls reduced the occurrence of new cases, which were mainly due to accidental exposures, to a minimum. The fact that continuously growing production and consumption did not alter this trend demonstrates the effectiveness of the present threshold limit value. It shows that the potential health hazard can be well contained and that beryllium can be produced and fabricated without unduemore » risk to employees or the general public.« less
  • Since the early history of lipoprotein isolation and characterization dates back more than 60 years, it would be helpful to describe some of the landmarks occurring before about 1965. This document contains historical perspectives and information on lipoprotein research and methodology. 35 refs., 9 figs., 1 tab.
  • From the beginning of the Manhattan Project in 1942 through the signing of the Atomic Energy Act (AEA) in 1946 and its reenactment in 1954, new policies and techniques began to evolve for managing waste produced in the manufacture of nuclear weapons. Even in the early days of war-time urgency, public health and safety were the major considerations in managing waste from this new technology. The Atomic Energy Commission (AEC), which took over from the Manhattan Engineer District (MED) in 1947, established initial waste category management guidelines (high level waste stored in tanks, solid low level waste disposed of primarilymore » in trenches, and liquid waste released to ponds, cribs, and pits) based on the management concepts developed by the MED. The AEC and its successor agencies managed radioactive waste in a manner consistent with existing industrial health and safety requirements of that era. With the formation of the Department of Energy (DOE) in September 1977, techniques and internal requirements were already in place or being established that, in some cases, were more protective of human health and the environment than existing legislation and environmental standards. With the transition to environmental cleanup of former DOE weapons production facilities, new and revised guidelines were created to address hazardous and radioactive mixed waste, waste minimization, and recycling. This paper reviews the waste management guidelines as they have evolved from the MED through the resent time.« less