skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Seismic Hammer Shakedown (MAGNI).


Abstract not provided.

Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA), Office of Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation (NA-20)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Resource Relation:
Conference: Proposed for presentation at the Briefing for PEMEX Oil.
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Abbott, Robert. Seismic Hammer Shakedown (MAGNI).. United States: N. p., 2015. Web.
Abbott, Robert. Seismic Hammer Shakedown (MAGNI).. United States.
Abbott, Robert. 2015. "Seismic Hammer Shakedown (MAGNI).". United States. doi:.
title = {Seismic Hammer Shakedown (MAGNI).},
author = {Abbott, Robert},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2015,
month = 2

Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • This paper describes the Albany New York Solid Wate Energy Recovery System (ANSWERS), which consists of two plants - a City-owned Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF) Plant, and a State-owned Boiler Plant in which RDF is burned. This paper is chiefly concerned with the RDF Plant, and describes shakedown tests, problems encountered and solutions developed. Operational statistics and operations policies for the plant are discussed. Laboratory measurements of the heating value of RDF samples are compared with results actually achieved in the boilers.
  • All new plants require a shakedown period. That first operational trial of equipment is to determine operational characteristics, debugging of operational problems, and required modifications for good plant performance. The New York State RDF (Refuse Derived Fuel) Steam Generating Plant was no exception. It all started with the first light off of RDF in April 1981 and has continued to the present time. This paper is presented to tell of the problems as they arose and how the operating forces dealt with them.
  • IGT has extensive experience in operating a coal-fed ash-agglomerating U-GAS pilot plant to investigate process feasibility and produce data for commercial plant design. The operation of this pilot plant however, is expensive, whether for a feasibility test or a scale-up confirmation test because of manpower needs for plant operations and data analyses as well as utilities costs. From this background has emerged the need for a smaller scale ash-agglomerating unit operable at significantly higher pressure but at lower test cost. This process development type unit (PDU) would be primarily limited to feedstock feasibility tests. The PDU, however, having been designedmore » for 20-bar operating pressure, facilitates fluidized-bed ash-agglomerating studies that cannot be investigated at this time in the pilot plant. The need for a high-pressure PDU has been recently enhanced due to the commercial interest in U-GAS process design for chemical feedstocks and SNG production; both of these uses place a premium on gasification processes operating at elevated pressure. The PDU was designed at approximately at 1:20 scaledown from the pilot plant and is operable adiabatically because it employs a heavily insulated double shell design. The PDU design is a near duplicate of the pilot plant configuration. The PDU was installed in the U-GAS pilot plant building which makes available for use the existing solids-handling facilities including that of a separate but nearby room suitable for a process control panel. Shakedown of the PDU has confirmed its mechanical and adiabatic capability for fluidized-bed ash-agglomerating operating conditions. 1 figure.« less
  • An investigation of the shakedown behavior of equal-thickness axisymmetric nozzles in spheres is presented. The elastic compensation method is used to obtain shakedown loads for a range of nozzle configurations. The calculated shakedown pressures are compared with shakedown curves from the literature and the ASME B and PV Code Section 8 Division 2 primary plus secondary stress requirements.