skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: What would we do without Rare Earths

Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Ames Laboratory (AMES), Ames, IA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
IS-PR 0010
DOE Contract Number:
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

King, Alexander. What would we do without Rare Earths. United States: N. p., 2015. Web.
King, Alexander. What would we do without Rare Earths. United States.
King, Alexander. 2015. "What would we do without Rare Earths". United States. doi:.
title = {What would we do without Rare Earths},
author = {King, Alexander},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2015,
month = 1
  • The separation of trivalent rare earth metals in conditions interfering with hydroxide precipitation was studied. It was found that under certain conditions La, Ce, Nd, Pm, Y, Er, snd Lu, which do not have stable divalent states, csn be separated at a mercury cathode. It is postulated that electrolytic separation results from a reduction to the divalent state followed by an exchange with mercury amalgam. (R.V.J.)
  • We identify several types of gauge theories, which together comprise a very broad range, in which the observation of neutrinoless double beta decay would imply a significant lower bound on neutrino mass. We explain why these gauge theories have this property.
  • Although nuclear power continues to play an active role in the energy planning of other nations, the U.S. nuclear power industry is dead. Its rebirth will take more than increasing energy supply pressures, public relations, and a little fine tuning. Five basic domestic problems plague the current US nuclear power system: The nation has been building the wrong kind of reactors; has organized and managed reactor construction improperly; has taken the wrong approach to handling radioactive wastes; and has failed to resolve issues that can be solved only through high-level political will and leadership. A critical element that pervades muchmore » of the nuclear issue is a failure to treat the public with respect. With a change in philosophy and some bold new programs, these five problems could be resolved domestically. A sixth problem, involving the more effective management of nuclear weapons and their proliferation, will require collective international solutions. This paper examines each of these areas.« less
  • The impacts of a complete test ban on the programs and personnel at the Lawrence Radiation Laboratory. The weapons program with its four major sub-programs are discussed as are those programs outside the weapons arena. The utilization of scientific and technical personnel is also detailed.
  • The history of disarmament negotiations is often said to be a history of missed opportunities. This is certainly true of most arms-control measures, but it is not true of the proposal to ban all nuclear weapons test explosions for all time. On three occasions during the past 30 years a test ban seemed imminent to outsiders and even to some negotiators: in 1958, when an East-West conference of seismic experts produced a report on the feasibility of detecting nuclear explosions; in 1962-1963, when the lack of agreement in the Eighteen Nation Committee on Disarmament on the number of mandatory on-sitemore » inspections per year was alleged to be the sole obstacle to a test ban treaty; and in 1977-1980, when Britain, the United States, and the Soviet Union appeared to make progress toward concluding a treaty in their trilateral negotiations. Having closely followed the debate, the author is convinced that at no time were the negotiators close to reaching agreement on a comprehensive test ban. But if the United States and the Soviet Union were to change the military doctrines that calls for ever more accurate and specialized nuclear weapons, he feels a treaty limiting tests to a very-low-yield explosions could now be negotiated. 2 references.« less