skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: NIF S600D Snout Final Design Review (FDR) Report


Abstract not provided.

 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Ahmed, M., Hibbard, R., Moore, A., Benstead, J., Baker, K., Soufli, R., Pardini, T., Hau-Riege, S., Bedzyk, M., Shoup, M., Reagan, S., and Angliata, T. NIF S600D Snout Final Design Review (FDR) Report. United States: N. p., 2015. Web. doi:10.2172/1182239.
Ahmed, M., Hibbard, R., Moore, A., Benstead, J., Baker, K., Soufli, R., Pardini, T., Hau-Riege, S., Bedzyk, M., Shoup, M., Reagan, S., & Angliata, T. NIF S600D Snout Final Design Review (FDR) Report. United States. doi:10.2172/1182239.
Ahmed, M., Hibbard, R., Moore, A., Benstead, J., Baker, K., Soufli, R., Pardini, T., Hau-Riege, S., Bedzyk, M., Shoup, M., Reagan, S., and Angliata, T. 2015. "NIF S600D Snout Final Design Review (FDR) Report". United States. doi:10.2172/1182239.
title = {NIF S600D Snout Final Design Review (FDR) Report},
author = {Ahmed, M. and Hibbard, R. and Moore, A. and Benstead, J. and Baker, K. and Soufli, R. and Pardini, T. and Hau-Riege, S. and Bedzyk, M. and Shoup, M. and Reagan, S. and Angliata, T.},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {10.2172/1182239},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2015,
month = 2

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • This design review examined the design documents contained in a notebook prepared for the final design review of the multiport riser assembly. This assembly will support the Hydrogen Mitigation Test program for mitigation of safety issues for Hanford Waste Tank 241-SY-101. The purpose of the Multiport Riser is to provide multiple access ports of several diameters in a single 42 inch riser for simultaneous access of test and support equipment. The notebook was titled: {open_quotes}Multiport Riser Final Design Review.{close_quotes} The review was conducted using a database comment registration system whereby the reviewer comments were entered into the database and eachmore » comment was given a unique identifier. During the review, each comment was referred to by its identifier. Changes to comments, responses, and actions needed were made with the agreement of the committee and the reviewers at the formal design review meeting held March 1, 1994. When the structural analyses were available, they were distributed for review which allowed closure of all design review comments. Approval of the design was achieved and supporting documents are included in this report.« less
  • NUREG-0700, Revision 1, provides human factors engineering (HFE) guidance to the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission staff for its: (1) review of the human system interface (HSI) design submittals prepared by licensees or applications for a license or design certification of commercial nuclear power plants, and (2) performance of HSI reviews that could be undertaken as part of an inspection or other type of regulatory review involving HSI design or incidents involving human performance. The guidance consists of a review process and HFE guidelines. The document describes those aspects of the HSI design review process that are important to the identificationmore » and resolution of human engineering discrepancies that could adversely affect plant safety. Guidance is provided that could be used by the staff to review an applicant`s HSI design review process or to guide the development of an HSI design review plan, e.g., as part of an inspection activity. The document also provides detailed HFE guidelines for the assessment of HSI design implementations. NUREG-0700, Revision 1, consists of three stand-alone volumes. Volume 3 contains an interactive software application of the NUREG-0700, Revision 1 guidance and a user`s guide for this software. The software supports reviewers during review preparation, evaluation design using the human factors engineering guidelines, and in report preparation. The user`s guide provides system requirements and installation instructions, detailed explanations of the software`s functions and features, and a tutorial on using the software.« less
  • The Basalt Waste Isolation Project (BWIP) is an investigative program being conducted by the US Department of Energy to determine the feasibility of locating a nuclear waste repository in the deep basalts beneath the Hanford Site in south-central Washington. As part of the site characterization phase of the program, an Exploratory Shaft Facility (ESF) will be constructed to conduct in situ testing for site characterization and feasibility. The Bureau of Mines has been solicited by DOE, through an Interagency Agreement, to review the subject report as an independent reviewer. The review of this report covers three general areas: hydrology, ventilation,more » and shaft sinking and excavation. The hydrology section evaluates water inflow parameters and quantities and the water inflow range. The ventilation section evaluates underground ventilation air quantities; methane inflow parameters and quantities; gassy mine cost impacts; shaft ventilation and conveyance velocity criteria; and methane release rate. The shaft sinking and excavation section evaluates the second shaft cost estimate and hoisting; underground development schedule; and underground drifting. 8 refs.« less
  • This first volume of the five volume set begins with a CPDR overview and then details the PF magnet system, manufacturing R&D, Westinghouse R&D, the central solenoid, the PF 5 ring coil, the PF 6/7 ring coil, quality assurance, and the system design description.
  • This document describes a method for using the Building Loads Analysis and System Thermodynamics (BLAST) energy-simulation computer program to review the energy effectiveness of the new Army facility designs. This review method covers both aspects of new Army's energy criteria: prescriptive energy standards and facility energy-design budgets. The method compares the energy-criteria with information contained in a BLAST output deck. This deck contains most of the information needed to review a new design for compliance with energy criteria. A special BLAST Design Review Summary Report was developed which provides, in an easy-to-read, standard format, the information needed to check amore » design for energy criteria compliance. A description of the prototype design review procedure was published in USA-CERL TR-E-190. The review procedure and the Review Summary Report were modified based on the results of field tests. The modifications, which are presented in this report, further enhance the procedure's utility by providing the user with more information about the building design, making the Review Summary Report more of a stand-alone document. This report describes how Army Corps of Engineers Districts can use the BLAST Review Summary Report to review the energy effectiveness of new facility designs submitted by architect/engineer firms who use BLAST.« less