skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A Guidance Document for Laser System Supervisors

; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
SLAC National Accelerator Lab., Menlo Park, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Resource Relation:
Conference: Presented at the International Laser Safety Conference, 23 - 26 Mar 2015, Albuquerque, MN, USA
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Corbett, Jeff, Woods, Michael, and /SLAC. A Guidance Document for Laser System Supervisors. United States: N. p., 2015. Web.
Corbett, Jeff, Woods, Michael, & /SLAC. A Guidance Document for Laser System Supervisors. United States.
Corbett, Jeff, Woods, Michael, and /SLAC. 2015. "A Guidance Document for Laser System Supervisors". United States. doi:.
title = {A Guidance Document for Laser System Supervisors},
author = {Corbett, Jeff and Woods, Michael and /SLAC},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 2015,
month = 3

Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • An Oil Shale Pollution Control Guidance Document is being prepared by the EPA, (Environmental Protection Agency) Oil Shale Work Group under direction provided by the Alternate Fuels Group and the Industrial Environmental Research Laboratory, Cincinnati. This document employs a unique multimedia approach to present extensive information on the design, performance and cost of environmental control technology options applicable to a commerical oil shale industry. Major portions of the document have been drafted and are undergoing internal review and revision within EPA. Following internal review and revision, the document will be made available for public review and submission of written comments.
  • The purpose of this guidance document is to introduce Lighting Hazard Management, a unified approach that combines hazard identification and facility categorization (not discussed in this paper) with a new concept -- the Lighting Safety System. We do not intend to develop a brand new lightning code or standard, but rather reference other codes, standards and guides that we determine to be applicable. Using the graded approach to systematic risk management allows for in-depth protection and aids in ensuring personnel safety and optimizing resource protection.
  • The authors are developing a guidance document for the lightning protection of US Department of Energy (DOE) facilities to satisfy the requirements of the department`s order DOE 5480.28, Natural Phenomena Hazards (NPH) Mitigation Performance Goals for Structures, Systems and Components (SSCs). This order specifies a systematic process of well defined and integrated design and evaluation criteria for the protection of SSCs. The document introduces the idea of Lightning Hazard Management because there is no single document that presents a unified approach to lightning protection. Earlier versions of the US National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) Code, Lightning Protection, NFPA-78, only addressedmore » the protection of structures. This is also true of the International Lightning Protection Standard, IEC-1024 and the Underwriters Laboratories recently issued Standard for Safety, Lightning Protection Components, UL 96.« less
  • In evaluating innovative technologies for hazardous waste cleanup, work safety and health issues are rarely considered. In two 1995 technical workshops, co-sponsored by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) and the US Department of Energy (DOE), dozens of experts from government, labor, industry, and academia gathered to write a Guidance Document to be used by the developers and users of innovative cleanup technology. The Guidance Document, which was developed by NIEHS, DOE, and a team of experts, recommends tools to package safety and health information in usable forms--including safety hazard matrices, health hazard matrices, transition check lists, andmore » technology safety data sheets--as well as the need for checklists and contract clauses between remediation companies and responsible parties. Also included in the Guidance Document is a model for phase analysis with a list of the hazards associated with each phase of technological development and implementation. The Guidance Document creates checklists for better identification of hazards that occur during transitions. Emergency response needs are also a focus of the Guidance Document, with minimum standards a key element. Case studies, because they are such powerful tools, are an integral part of the Guidance Document.« less
  • Wheelabrator Environmental Systems Inc. (Wheelabrator) currently owns and/or operates 21 power plants, 15 of which are municipal waste combustion (MWC) facilities. In response to a May, 1994 US Supreme Court decision, all MWC facilities are required by the US Environmental Protection (EPA) to determine if the facility ash residues are hazardous waste. This paper presents the results of ash characterizations done at Wheelabrator MWC facilities. All Wheelabrator MWC facilities are equipped with WES-PHix{reg_sign} ash stabilization systems. The ash from these facilities consistently yields test results well below regulatory thresholds. However, installing a state-of-the-art ash stabilization system does not guarantee thatmore » ash is accurately characterized. Proper sampling protocols and proper analytical technique are critical to insuring accurate characterization. This paper identifies typical issues encountered during sample collection, sample preparation, an toxicity test extraction procedures. The consistently low toxicity test results for ash from Wheelabrator facilities can be attributed to the effectiveness of the WES-PHix{reg_sign} ash stabilization process. The sample collection protocols developed by Wheelabrator, and proper toxicity test extraction and analytical procedures followed by the laboratories, ensure accurate characterization.« less