skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Automating the JGI's Community Sequencing Program

Authors:
; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
OSTI Identifier:
1165585
Report Number(s):
LBNL-6836E
DOE Contract Number:
DE-AC02-05CH11231
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: 2nd Annual JGI User Meeting, Walnut Creek, CA
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS; CSP, Community Sequencing Program, AJAX

Citation Formats

Patil, Jayant, Fazo, Joni, Kobayashi, Art, Greiner, Annette, Voloshin, Arkady, Kale, Pat, Fenner, Marsha, Bruce, David, Cheng, Jan-Fang, and Bristow, Jim. Automating the JGI's Community Sequencing Program. United States: N. p., 2007. Web.
Patil, Jayant, Fazo, Joni, Kobayashi, Art, Greiner, Annette, Voloshin, Arkady, Kale, Pat, Fenner, Marsha, Bruce, David, Cheng, Jan-Fang, & Bristow, Jim. Automating the JGI's Community Sequencing Program. United States.
Patil, Jayant, Fazo, Joni, Kobayashi, Art, Greiner, Annette, Voloshin, Arkady, Kale, Pat, Fenner, Marsha, Bruce, David, Cheng, Jan-Fang, and Bristow, Jim. Mon . "Automating the JGI's Community Sequencing Program". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1165585.
@article{osti_1165585,
title = {Automating the JGI's Community Sequencing Program},
author = {Patil, Jayant and Fazo, Joni and Kobayashi, Art and Greiner, Annette and Voloshin, Arkady and Kale, Pat and Fenner, Marsha and Bruce, David and Cheng, Jan-Fang and Bristow, Jim},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Mar 26 00:00:00 EDT 2007},
month = {Mon Mar 26 00:00:00 EDT 2007}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • The Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Site Closure, EM-30, houses the document library pertaining to sites that are related to the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) and regularly addresses ongoing information demands, primarily from Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, interested members of the public, the DOE, and other Federal Agencies. To address these demands more efficiently, DOE has begun to implement a new multi-phase, information management process known as e-FUSRAP. The first phase of e-FUSRAP, the development of the Considered Sites Database, summarizes and allows public access to complex information on over 600 sites considered asmore » candidates for FUSRAP. The second phase of e-FUSRAP, the development of the Document Indexing Database, will create an internal index of more than 10,000 documents in the FUSRAP library's case file, allowing more effective management and retrieval of case file documents. Together, the phases of e-FUSRAP will allow EM-30 to become an innovative leader in enhancing public information sources.« less
  • The problem of reducing the cost of developing, validating, and maintaining packages of numerical subroutines is a topic currently under investigation. Where such packages are to be made available in versions tailored to run on several different manufacturers' computers, the problem has been attacked by taking advantage of commonality; that is, the number of routines to be handled (and hence the cost) is reduced by creating a kind of prototype for each routine which can be processed automatically to produce the several required machine-tailored versions of that routine. It is shown here how these costs can often be further reducedmore » by taking a more general view of commonality. Packages frequently contain several subroutines which are the same program realized in different modes. The potential economies of commonality can be achieved by employing a program manipulation system which permits one to describe (and to automate) the construction of different realizations of the same prototype program. The capabilities of one such system are illustrated by considering in detail a program realization which trades structure for efficiency in some implementations: namely, the realization of prototype programs which call the Hanson, Krogh, and Lawson Basic Linear Algebra Modules, as programs with these calls replaced by in-line code. The analysis of this realization and the specification of transformations which guide the manipulation system in constructing it are described. Finally, some of the problems involved in trying to demonstrate the correctness of this automated realization are considered briefly. 15 figures.« less
  • A JGI Multimedia Presentation: Buried deep beneath the surface of Antarctica is a fresh water lake, Lake Vostok.
  • The U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute (JGI) invited scientists interested in the application of genomics to bioenergy and environmental issues, as well as all current and prospective users and collaborators, to attend the annual DOE JGI Genomics of Energy Environment Meeting held March 22-24, 2011 in Walnut Creek, CA. The emphasis of this meeting was on the genomics of renewable energy strategies, carbon cycling, environmental gene discovery, and engineering of fuel-producing organisms. The meeting features presentations by leading scientists advancing these topics. DOE JGI Deputy Director Jim Bristow gives a presentation on the Community Sequencing Program at themore » 6th annual Genomics of Energy and Environment Meeting on March 23, 2011.« less
  • From 2002 until 2004, on behalf of the Desert Research Institute (DRI), I conducted an oral history project that focused on the participants in the Community Environmental Monitoring Program (CEMP). In the late 1970's, Nevada scientists who participated in the response to the Three Mile Island event returned to Nevada with the idea for a program similar to one being implemented in Pennsylvania. That program directly involved local stakeholders in an independent monitoring effort. As a result, the CEMP was established in 1981, with the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) providing the funding and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)more » providing technical and scientific direction, maintaining instrumentation and sampling equipment, analyzing the collected samples, and interpreting and reporting the data. Initially, DRI was largely responsible for identifying and hiring community participants and organizing annual training workshops, later assuming complete responsibility for technical operation of the monitoring network from EPA. The goal was to establish fixed monitoring stations around Nevada, Utah and California, and directly involve stakeholders in the monitoring process. Local teachers would be recruited to receive training and maintain the stations while reporting back to their communities on the monitoring activities and any risks they, or their citizens, perceived. This active stakeholder involvement was intended to provide communities with an immediate resource for any questions or concerns related to testing. It also created a vehicle through which to educate the public about radiation and testing. In the early years of nuclear weapons testing, interactions between local residents and the government were often defined by a lack of communication and understanding. The distrust that existed between government agencies and Nevada, Utah, and California residents, was a perspective that persisted for years after the testing moratorium and continues to endure, to a lesser extent, today. It was this distrust that the Community Environmental Monitoring Program was designed to ameliorate, providing communities and ranches with impartial scientific evidence to address their many concerns. A goal of the oral history project was to gain a better understanding of the CEMP by exploring and documenting its origins and allowing the people who continue to make it a part of their lives tell their stories. Within those stories, we wanted to discover if the program established trust in Nevada, Utah and California communities and ranches; what the program meant and continues to mean to the government, state institutions and local people who participate, and why the program is unique. In order to achieve these goals, DOE funded a two year oral history project. I interviewed the program founders, DOE, EPA and DRI participants, local station managers, and many people with an interest in testing and the government response to downwind communities. This paper includes the purpose, process, and development of the oral history project; why oral history was chosen as the appropriate methodology; who was chosen for an interview and why; some of the pitfalls encountered; what lessons were learned and what value the project has to DOE and the stakeholders in local communities. (authors)« less