skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Updates to Risk Ranking Algorithm for Repackaging Prioritization of LANL Nuclear Material Storage Containers

Authors:
 [1];  [1];  [1];  [1];  [1]
  1. Los Alamos National Laboratory
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Los Alamos National Lab. (LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
DOE/LANL
OSTI Identifier:
1148961
Report Number(s):
LA-UR-14-26030
DOE Contract Number:
AC52-06NA25396
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
Mathematics & Computing(97)

Citation Formats

Hoffman, Jenifer Ann, Prochnow, David Adrian, Smith, Paul Herrick, Teague, Jonathan Gayle, and Veirs, Douglas Kirk. Updates to Risk Ranking Algorithm for Repackaging Prioritization of LANL Nuclear Material Storage Containers. United States: N. p., 2014. Web. doi:10.2172/1148961.
Hoffman, Jenifer Ann, Prochnow, David Adrian, Smith, Paul Herrick, Teague, Jonathan Gayle, & Veirs, Douglas Kirk. Updates to Risk Ranking Algorithm for Repackaging Prioritization of LANL Nuclear Material Storage Containers. United States. doi:10.2172/1148961.
Hoffman, Jenifer Ann, Prochnow, David Adrian, Smith, Paul Herrick, Teague, Jonathan Gayle, and Veirs, Douglas Kirk. Thu . "Updates to Risk Ranking Algorithm for Repackaging Prioritization of LANL Nuclear Material Storage Containers". United States. doi:10.2172/1148961. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1148961.
@article{osti_1148961,
title = {Updates to Risk Ranking Algorithm for Repackaging Prioritization of LANL Nuclear Material Storage Containers},
author = {Hoffman, Jenifer Ann and Prochnow, David Adrian and Smith, Paul Herrick and Teague, Jonathan Gayle and Veirs, Douglas Kirk},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.2172/1148961},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Thu Jul 31 00:00:00 EDT 2014},
month = {Thu Jul 31 00:00:00 EDT 2014}
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • This document presents the risk-based prioritization methodology developed to evaluate and rank Environmental Restoration (ER) work packages at the five US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Field Office (DOE-ORO) sites [i.e., Oak Ridge K-25 Site (K-25), Portsmouth Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PORTS), Paducah Gaseous Diffusion Plant (PGDP), Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL), and the Oak Ridge Y-12 Plant (Y-12)], the ER Off-site Program, and Central ER. This prioritization methodology was developed to support the increased rigor and formality of work planning in the overall conduct of operations within the DOE-ORO ER Program. Prioritization is conducted as an integral component of themore » fiscal ER funding cycle to establish program budget priorities. The purpose of the ER risk-based prioritization methodology is to provide ER management with the tools and processes needed to evaluate, compare, prioritize, and justify fiscal budget decisions for a diverse set of remedial action, decontamination and decommissioning, and waste management activities. The methodology provides the ER Program with a framework for (1) organizing information about identified DOE-ORO environmental problems, (2) generating qualitative assessments of the long- and short-term risks posed by DOE-ORO environmental problems, and (3) evaluating the benefits associated with candidate work packages designed to reduce those risks. Prioritization is conducted to rank ER work packages on the basis of the overall value (e.g., risk reduction, stakeholder confidence) each package provides to the ER Program. Application of the methodology yields individual work package ``scores`` and rankings that are used to develop fiscal budget requests. This document presents the technical basis for the decision support tools and process.« less
  • In accordance with the SAVY-4000 Surveillance Plan [1] and DOE M441.1-1 requirements, storage container surveillance continued through fiscal year 2017 at Los Alamos National Laboratory. Surveillance items for the year consisted of 8 SAVY-4000 storage containers, 8 Hagan containers, and 39 SAVY-4000 transfer containers. The SAVY-4000 surveillance items ranged in age from 1 year to 5.6 years and the Hagan containers ranged in age from 6.3 years to 17.6 years. The surveillance containers for this year were selected primarily to better understand the extent of corrosion of the stainless steel components of the containers. Accelerated aging studies indicate that themore » O-ring and filter components of the SAVY-4000 will last at least 40 years under LANL storage conditions. However, the observation of corrosion on the inside of SAVY-4000 and Hagan surveillance containers has shifted the emphasis to understanding both the nature and the extent of corrosion on the stainless steel body. The restriction on handling soluble residues greater than 500 grams continued this year, delaying the surveillance of some items that was scheduled in earlier surveillance plans.« less
  • Pressure-sensitive seals on containers used for onsite storage of SNM are passive devices that indicate, upon inspection, whether tampering or entry has occurred. These seals may also serve as labels. This guide provides criteria acceptable to the USAEC Regulatory staff for selecting, affixing, and testing pressuresensitive seals used for tamper-safing in connection with the onsite storage of SNM for compliance with the Commission's regulations with respect to material control. (TFD)
  • The paper presents a risk-based approach for rapid prioritization of low-level liquid radioactive waste underground storage tanks (LLLW USTs), for possible interim corrective measures and/or ultimate closure. The ranking of LLLW USTs is needed to ensure that tanks with the greatest potential for adverse impact on the environment and human health receive top priority for further evaluation and remediation. Wastes from the LLLW USTs at Oak Ridge National Laboratory were pumped out when the tanks were removed from service. The residual liquids and sludge contain a mixture of radionuclides and chemicals. Contaminants of concern that were identified in the liquidmore » phase of the inactive LLLW USTs include the radionuclides [sup 90]Sr, [sup 137]Cs, and [sup 233]U and the chemicals carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethane, tetrachloroethene, methyl ethyl ketone, mercury, lead, and chromium. The risk-based approach for prioritization of the LLLW USTs is based upon three major criteria: (1) leaking characteristics of the tank, (2) location of the tanks, and (3) toxic potential of the tank contents. Leaking characteristics of LLLW USTs will aid in establishing the potential for the release of contaminants to environmental media. In this study, only the liquid phase was assumed to be released to the environment. Scoring criteria for release potential of LLLW USTs was determined after consideration of the magnitude of any known leaks and the tank type for those that are not known to leak.« less