skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Singapore Data Collection.

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1148199
Report Number(s):
SAND2007-3359C
522691
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Proposed for presentation at the Data Collection Workshop held June 4-8, 2007 in Singapore, Singapore.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Stamp, Jason Edwin, Young, William F., and Page, Karen J. Singapore Data Collection.. United States: N. p., 2007. Web.
Stamp, Jason Edwin, Young, William F., & Page, Karen J. Singapore Data Collection.. United States.
Stamp, Jason Edwin, Young, William F., and Page, Karen J. Tue . "Singapore Data Collection.". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1148199.
@article{osti_1148199,
title = {Singapore Data Collection.},
author = {Stamp, Jason Edwin and Young, William F. and Page, Karen J.},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2007},
month = {Tue May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2007}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • By 1994, more than 27,000 leaking underground fuel tank (LUFT) cases had been identified in the State of California, with about 21,000 active cases. Since 1985, regulatory oversight agencies have accumulated literal mountains of paperwork containing both spatial and time-series hydrogeologic, chemical, and other data reported at LUFT sites. Prior to November 1994, there had been no systematic attempt to assemble these data into a computerized format suitable for statistical evaluation. In November of 1994, the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) began collection of LUFT data throughout California to create such a database in support of the Lawrence Livermoremore » National Laboratories (LLNL) ``California Leaking Underground Fuel Tank (LUFT) Historical Case Analyses.`` The purpose of these efforts was to evaluate the distribution of measured soil and groundwater impacts caused by gasoline, diesel, and waste oil, and to identify the controlling factors which influence the magnitude and extent of fuel hydrocarbon plumes in groundwater. From the eligible pool, the SWRCB selected a representative (or targeted) subset of 1,831 sites for its own data collection efforts. Pertinent data were collected by two SWRCB teams who traveled to various regulatory agencies throughout the State and obtained the most complete, up-to-date information available in the files for each site.« less
  • One of the several activities the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors perform in the verification process of Safeguard operations is the review and correlation of data from different sources. This process is often complex due to the different forms in which the data is presented. This paper describes some of the elements that are necessary to create a ''standardized'' structure for the verification of data. When properly collected and formatted, data can be analyzed with off-the shelf software applications using customized macros to automate the commands for the desired analysis. The standardized-data collection methodology is based on instrumentation guidelinesmore » as well as data structure elements, such as verifiable timing of data entry, automated data logging, identification codes, and others. The identification codes are used to associate data items with their sources and to correlate them with items from other data logging activities. The addition of predefined parameter ranges allows automated evaluation with the capability to provide a data summary, a cross-index of all data related to a specific event. Instances of actual databases are used as examples. The data collection guidelines described in this paper facilitate the use of data from a variety of instrumentation platforms and also allow the instrumentation itself to be more easily applied in subsequent monitoring applications.« less
  • Packages designed to transport radioactive materials are required to survive exposure to environments defined in Code of Federal Regulations. Cask designers can investigate package designs through structural and thermal testing of full-scale packages, components, or representative models. The acquisition of reliable response data from instrumentation measurement devices is an essential part of this testing activity. Sandia National Laboratories, under the sponsorship of the US Department of Energy (DOE), has developed the Mobile Instrumentation Data Acquisition System (MIDAS) dedicated to the collection and processing of structural and thermal data from regulatory tests.
  • In analyzing the reliability of complex systems, several types of data from full-system tests to component level tests are commonly available and are used. After a preliminary analysis, additional resources may be available to collect new data. The goal of resource allocation is to identify the best new data to collect to maximally improve the prediction of system reliability. While several possible definitions of 'maximally improve' are possible, we focus on reducing the uncertainty or the width of the uncertainty interval for the prediction of system reliability at a user-specified age(s). In this paper, we present an algorithm that allowsmore » us to estimate the anticipated improvement to the analysis with the addition of new data, based on current understanding of all of the statistical model parameters. This quantitative assessment of the anticipated improvement can be helpful to justify the benefits of collecting new data. Additionally by comparing different potential allocations, it is possible to determine what new data should be collected to improve our understanding of the response. This optimization takes into account the relative cost of different data types and can be based on flexible allocation options, or subject to logistical constraints.« less