skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: R&D Integration: How to Build A Diverse and Integrated Knowledge Community.

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1148133
Report Number(s):
SAND2007-3374C
522693
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Proposed for presentation at the Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology Annual Conference held August 4-9, 2007 in Portland, OR.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Jordan, Gretchen B., Hage, Jerald, and Mote, Jonathan. R&D Integration: How to Build A Diverse and Integrated Knowledge Community.. United States: N. p., 2007. Web.
Jordan, Gretchen B., Hage, Jerald, & Mote, Jonathan. R&D Integration: How to Build A Diverse and Integrated Knowledge Community.. United States.
Jordan, Gretchen B., Hage, Jerald, and Mote, Jonathan. Tue . "R&D Integration: How to Build A Diverse and Integrated Knowledge Community.". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1148133.
@article{osti_1148133,
title = {R&D Integration: How to Build A Diverse and Integrated Knowledge Community.},
author = {Jordan, Gretchen B. and Hage, Jerald and Mote, Jonathan},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2007},
month = {Tue May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2007}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • The European Commission is implementing R and D programs in the field of management and storage of radioactive waste. These programs are being carried out either under shared-cost contracts by national laboratories in the various Member States of the European Union or in the Joint Research Centers of the European Atomic Energy Community (Euratom). The Council of the European Union made a decision on 16 December 1994 concerning a new Community R and D program on Nuclear Fission Safety (1994--1998), including research on radioactive waste management and disposal. One of the main objectives of the activities to be carried outmore » is to contribute to a further integration of the efforts undertaken by the Member States and the Community to develop the technical basis and a common understanding of the scientific issues of the disposal of long-lived radioactive waste, specifically spent fuel and vitrified high-level waste. The need to establish the scientific basis for guidelines for waste management practices, where necessary from review of past work, is also recognized.« less
  • Real basic scientific research principally is individual human expression, with no known proven techniques or procedures to achieve its purpose. For this reason present day quality assurance techniques are only applicable to the myriad of measurements, procedures, constructions, etc., which are carried out in support of basic scientific research, but which are themselves not basic scientific research.
  • A 2-day workshop ''Physical and Chemical Property Measurements for the Gas Hydrate R&D Community'' was held on 17-18 September 2001. Putting together this workshop was a joint effort by LLNL, MBARI and the USGS, Menlo Park. Twenty-two people from a wide variety of institutions and backgrounds participated. An additional eighteen people were forced to cancel at the last minute due to the events of 11 September 2001. The premise of the workshop was that progress in nearly every aspect of gas hydrate research depends fundamentally on the availability of high-quality property data and the development of laboratory insights into themore » physics and chemistry that govern gas hydrates in nature. One objective of the workshop was to develop a dialogue between laboratory scientists who make property measurements of gas hydrates and scientists who use these data for quantitative modeling. A second objective was to help facilitate research among experimentalists and the acquisition of reliable gas hydrate properties. The latter focused mainly, but not exclusively, on researchers from institutions in the San Francisco Bay Area to energize a community that has a geographic advantage in collaborative relationships. The workshop was successful at meeting both of these objectives, although the unique perspectives of the invitees who weren't able to attend were missed. After reviewing the current state of gas hydrate R&D with respect to property measurements, there was general agreement that it is time to move forward with new approaches (e.g., seafloor experiments, lab experiments with hydrate-sediment aggregates) and new applications of techniques (e.g., improved seismics, in situ x-ray and neutron diffraction and tomography, and NMR scanning). The workshop consensus is summarized at the end of this document in a table of fundamental questions pertaining to natural gas hydrates and possible experimental lab and seafloor approaches to answering them.« less
  • The Chemistry & Materials Sciences (C&MS) Directorate is in the third year of a four-year space consolidation plan. In 1994, approximately half of the total directorate square footage was comprised of 40-year old wet chemistry research buildings that had exceeded their useful life and were viewed a legacy facilities to the program. This mix of old vs. new laboratory space was not properly aligned nor suited for future needs of C&MS, from both the cultural or economic position, thus change was needed. C&MS instituted an aggressive, strategic, business-driven space consolidation initiative, called SAT (Space Action Team), to optimize space utilization,more » reduce annual costs, meet strategic program needs, and consolidate activities by functional area. The plan called for a 4-year process beginning in FY95 to realign the directorate`s facility portfolio through relocations, consolidations, transfer of facility ownership, demolition of trailers and new construction with a 20% sq/ft reduction as an end goal. As with all business driven initiatives, existing operating costs, implementation costs, cost avoidance and future operating costs were key metrics to measure against the strategic goal. Where P2 was not an essential element in the strategic planning process, it played a key role in the continuing success of the process. SAT is in year three of the four year plan (approximate $5 million investment), which has made a major contribution to the success of C&MS by achieving the directorate`s goals of improving the utilization of space by 30%, increasing quality of the facilities, and reducing annual operating costs. To date, SAT has achieved an on-going organizational facility charge saving of $2 million /year, minimized Program downtime, transferred 120,000 sq ft to new owners, relocated 86 labs, vacated 9 buildings, deactivate, decommissioned and decontaminated four 40 plus year old R&D facilities, and demolished 9 trailers with no incidents or injuries. Our process cost continues to decline through lessons learned and P2 opportunities. Our paper will focus on three different aspects of the SAT process; team structure and process, laboratory relocations, and building D&D (deactivation and decommissioning).« less