skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Underground Storage of Hydrogen: Assessing Geostorage Options with a Life Cycle Based Systems Approach.

Abstract

Abstract not provided.

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
1142597
Report Number(s):
SAND2008-7739C
508658
DOE Contract Number:
AC04-94AL85000
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: Proposed for presentation at the 28th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference held December 3-5, 2008 in New Orleans, LA.
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Citation Formats

Lord, Anna C. Snider, Kobos, Peter Holmes, and Borns, David James. Underground Storage of Hydrogen: Assessing Geostorage Options with a Life Cycle Based Systems Approach.. United States: N. p., 2008. Web.
Lord, Anna C. Snider, Kobos, Peter Holmes, & Borns, David James. Underground Storage of Hydrogen: Assessing Geostorage Options with a Life Cycle Based Systems Approach.. United States.
Lord, Anna C. Snider, Kobos, Peter Holmes, and Borns, David James. Sat . "Underground Storage of Hydrogen: Assessing Geostorage Options with a Life Cycle Based Systems Approach.". United States. doi:. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1142597.
@article{osti_1142597,
title = {Underground Storage of Hydrogen: Assessing Geostorage Options with a Life Cycle Based Systems Approach.},
author = {Lord, Anna C. Snider and Kobos, Peter Holmes and Borns, David James},
abstractNote = {Abstract not provided.},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2008},
month = {Sat Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2008}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • Abstract One of the key objectives of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Nuclear Energy R&D Roadmap is the development of sustainable nuclear fuel cycles that can improve natural resource utilization and provide solutions to the management of nuclear wastes. Recently, an evaluation and screening (E&S) of fuel cycle systems has been conducted to identify those options that provide the best opportunities for obtaining such improvements and also to identify the required research and development activities that can support the development of advanced fuel cycle options. In order to evaluate and screen the E&S study included nine criteria including Developmentmore » and Deployment Risk (D&DR). More specifically, this criterion was represented by the following metrics: Development time, development cost, deployment cost from prototypic validation to first-of-a-kind commercial, compatibility with the existing infrastructure, existence of regulations for the fuel cycle and familiarity with licensing, and existence of market incentives and/or barriers to commercial implementation of fuel cycle processes. Given the comprehensive nature of the study, a systematic approach was needed to determine metric data for the D&DR criterion, and is presented here. As would be expected, the Evaluation Group representing the once-through use of uranium in thermal reactors is always the highest ranked fuel cycle Evaluation Group for this D&DR criterion. Evaluation Groups that consist of once-through fuel cycles that use existing reactor types are consistently ranked very high. The highest ranked limited and continuous recycle fuel cycle Evaluation Groups are those that recycle Pu in thermal reactors. The lowest ranked fuel cycles are predominately continuous recycle single stage and multi-stage fuel cycles that involve TRU and/or U-233 recycle.« less
  • In this paper, Life Cycle Climate Performance (LCCP) analysis is used to estimate lifetime direct and indirect carbon dioxide equivalent gas emissions of various refrigerant options and commercial refrigeration system designs, including the multiplex DX system with various hydrofluorocarbon (HFC) refrigerants, the HFC/R744 cascade system incorporating a medium-temperature R744 secondary loop, and the transcritical R744 booster system. The results of the LCCP analysis are presented, including the direct and indirect carbon dioxide equivalent emissions for each refrigeration system and refrigerant option. Based on the results of the LCCP analysis, recommendations are given for the selection of low GWP replacement refrigerantsmore » for use in existing commercial refrigeration systems, as well as for the selection of commercial refrigeration system designs with low carbon dioxide equivalent emissions, suitable for new installations.« less
  • The reactor coolant system (RCS) life cycle evaluation program for the Surry 1 nuclear power plant is intended to assess the effects of age-related degradation on important RCS components. This program, the first of its kind for a major NSS System because of its system evaluation perspective, consists of the following activities: establish current and past system conditions by means of historic data review, equipment inspections and tests, plant walkdowns, and interviews; define important components and their failure root causes, deterioration rates, and impact on system performance; develop methodology to predict life span of the RCS important components based onmore » deterioration rates, historic O and M data, and industry experience; and develop recommendations for continued reliable and safe operation of the system as well as plant life extension beyond licensed life. This paper describes the technical approach for the RCS life cycle evaluation program and major results since its initiation in October 1987.« less
  • In 1993, Conoco`s Management chartered a multi-business aboveground storage tank (AST) team to define the most cost-effective, life-cycle approach for Downstream AST construction and operations management. The AST Team consisted of personnel from engineering, environmental, refinery operations, and pipeline and terminal operations. The team`s objective was to examine the available options for providing AST bottom leak detection and release prevention barriers (RPBs) and then reach a consensus on the most cost-effective approach for the protection of soil and ground water. The team produced a strategy and a detailed standard that covers both new and existing tanks. This paper discusses themore » team`s findings and the approach used to reach its conclusions.« less