skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Using CORE Model-Based Systems Engineering Software to Support Program Management in the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program

Authors:
; ;
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Biomass Program
OSTI Identifier:
1086915
DOE Contract Number:
AC36-08GO28308
Resource Type:
Conference
Resource Relation:
Conference: [Proceedings of the] 17th Annual International Symposium of the International Council on Systems Engineering (INCOSE 2007): Systems Engineering: Key to Intelligent Enterprises, 24-28 June 2007, San Diego, California; Related Information: See NREL/CP-150-40811 for preprint
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
09 BIOMASS FUELS; 42 ENGINEERING; 97 MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTING; Energy Analysis; Bioenergy

Citation Formats

Simpkins, P., Riley, C., and Sandor, D. Using CORE Model-Based Systems Engineering Software to Support Program Management in the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program. United States: N. p., 2007. Web.
Simpkins, P., Riley, C., & Sandor, D. Using CORE Model-Based Systems Engineering Software to Support Program Management in the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program. United States.
Simpkins, P., Riley, C., and Sandor, D. Mon . "Using CORE Model-Based Systems Engineering Software to Support Program Management in the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program". United States. doi:.
@article{osti_1086915,
title = {Using CORE Model-Based Systems Engineering Software to Support Program Management in the U.S. Department of Energy Office of the Biomass Program},
author = {Simpkins, P. and Riley, C. and Sandor, D.},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2007},
month = {Mon Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2007}
}

Conference:
Other availability
Please see Document Availability for additional information on obtaining the full-text document. Library patrons may search WorldCat to identify libraries that hold this conference proceeding.

Save / Share:
  • This paper describes how a model-based systems engineering software, CORE, is helping the U. S. Department of Energy's Office of Biomass Program assist with bringing biomass-derived biofuels to the market. This software tool provides information to guide informed decision-making as biomass-to-biofuels systems are advanced from concept to commercial adoption. It facilitates management and communication of program status by automatically generating custom reports, Gantt charts, and tables using the widely available programs of Microsoft Word, Project and Excel.
  • This paper describes how the Systems Integration Office is assisting the Department of Energy's Biomass Program by using systems engineering processes, practices and tools to guide decisions and achieve goals.
  • The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) has collaborated with the Russian Federal Atomic Energy Agency - Rosatom (formerly Minatom) for 14 years on waste management challenges of mutual concern. Currently, EM is cooperating with Rosatom to explore issues related to high-level waste and investigate Russian experience and technologies that could support EM site cleanup needs. EM and Rosatom are currently implementing six collaborative projects on high-level waste issues: 1) Advanced Melter Technology Application to the U.S. DOE Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) - Cold Crucible Induction Heated Melter (CCIM); 2) - Design Improvements to themore » Cold Crucible Induction Heated Melter; 3) Long-term Performance of Hanford Low-Activity Glasses in Burial Environments; 4) Low-Activity-Waste (LAW) Glass Sulfur Tolerance; 5) Improved Retention of Key Contaminants of Concern in Low Temperature Immobilized Waste Forms; and, 6) Documentation of Mixing and Retrieval Experience at Zheleznogorsk. Preliminary results and the path forward for these projects will be discussed. An overview of two new projects 7) Entombment technology performance and methodology for the Future 8) Radiation Migration Studies at Key Russian Nuclear Disposal Sites is also provided. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of EM's objectives for participating in cooperative activities with the Russian Federal Atomic Energy Agency, present programmatic and technical information on these activities, and outline specific technical collaborations currently underway and planned to support DOE's cleanup and closure mission. (authors)« less
  • The scope of the monitoring effort included a total of 132 grants awarded to schools, hospitals, and other eligible institutions throughout the six New England States. The monitoring was conducted during a six-month period at the rate of approximately 22 grantees per month. Table 1 presents a summary of grantees assigned for monitoring for the period December 1981 - May 1982. The nature of the monitoring involved a significant level of communication and coordination with State Program Coordinators at the Boston Support Office and Program Managers at the State Energy Offices. The monitoring required the cooperation and active participation ofmore » the grantees' energy conservation grant project managers and building operators. The effort also required a high level of internal coordination due to the geographic dispersion of the grantees being monitored and the need to maintain regular communication with federal- and state-level officials during the course of the project. To address the requirements of all parties involved in the monitoring, it was necessary to organize and conduct the work in a systematic fashion. As a result, the approach to the monitoring program consisted of five distinct steps which were replicated on a monthly basis for each group of grants assigned for monitoring. These steps included: scheduling of site visits; review of working files prior to each visit; site visitation and meeting with grantee officials; notification of BSO regarding critical problems; and preparation of site visit and monthly reports.« less
  • The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has managed the Long Term Stewardship and Maintenance activities at DOE sites since 1988. DOE's Office of Legacy Management (LM) was established in December 2003, and its specific mission is to manage the DOE's post-closure responsibilities and ensure the future protection of human health and the environment. LM has control and custody for legacy land, structures, and facilities and is responsible for maintaining them at levels suitable for their long-term use. LM uses DOE Policy 454.1: Use of Institutional Controls (ICs) and Associated Guidance. Many major Federal laws, Executive Orders, regulations, and various othermore » drivers influence the establishment and use of ICs at LM sites. LM uses a wide range of ICs as part of efforts to appropriately limit access to, or uses of, land, facilities and other real and personal property assets; protect the environment; maintain the physical safety and security of DOE facilities; and prevent or limit inadvertent human and environmental exposure to residual contaminants and other hazards. ICs generally fall into one of four categories identified by EPA guidance, and DOE is successfully using a 'defense in depth' strategy which uses multiple mechanisms to provide 'layering' for additional durability and protectiveness: - Proprietary controls - such as easements and covenants. - Governmental controls - implemented and enforced by state or local governments. - Enforcement and permit tools with IC components - such as CERCLA agreements or RCRA permits. - Informational devices - such as state registries or public advisories. An additional practice that supports ICs at LM sites entails the use of engineered controls, such as fences, gates, access controls, etc. to ensure public access to applicable areas is limited. An engineered control that is not an IC is the disposal cell itself with its design criteria that protects the contaminated interior, controls the penetration of precipitation, and the provides a physical barrier to environmental and biological intrusion. Other site engineered controls manage surface runoff, restrict access, and provide a monitoring network to track residual contamination and ensure the integrity of the remedy. These engineered controls are part of the remedy and are not considered to be Institutional Controls. As of fiscal year 2006, LM has long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS and M) responsibilities at 70 sites in 27 states and Puerto Rico with 23 sites planned for transfer to the office during Fiscal Year 2007. ICs are in place at approximately 44 of the current LM sites and they are being tracked to ensure their integrity. A formal inspection process is used at many LM sites to confirm that remedial action components, including associated ICs, remain in place and are effective. Inspections are also critical for determining if additional maintenance or monitoring is necessary. Inspections may be conducted on an as-needed basis and frequencies can vary widely depending on site-specific policies and conditions, but typically occur on an annual basis. At CERCLA sites, the annual inspections are also incorporated into the Five-Year Review process. Inspection procedures are developed for each site and may contain the following components: - Development an inspection checklist based on previous findings or progressive changes in site conditions. - Physical inspection of engineered structures designed to contain or control waste materials. - Review of completed maintenance work and determination of maintenance needs. - Formal inspection of the physical location of IC areas to ensure continued protection of human health and the environment. - Contact of property owners to ensure continued awareness of ICs on their property. - Inspection of the IC areas to ensure that any restrictions imposed by the IC are not being violated, such as drilling of wells in an area that has groundwater restrictions. - Check of county records to verify that deed notices, easements, and other recorded instruments remain in place. - Preparation of report documenting inspection proceedings and schedule for completion of corrective actions, if any. The inspection process is a successful mechanism for ensuring effectiveness of ICs that allow protection of human health and the environment. As the LM site inventory grows to 131 sites by the year 2015, development and management of ICs will continue as an increasingly critical component of LTS and M programs. (authors)« less