skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Arctic 2030: What are the consequences of climate change?.

Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Sandia National Laboratories
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
OSTI Identifier:
Report Number(s):
Journal ID: ISSN 0096--3402
DOE Contract Number:
Resource Type:
Journal Article
Resource Relation:
Journal Name: Proposed for publication in Bulletin on the Atomic Scientists.; Journal Volume: 68; Journal Issue: 4
Country of Publication:
United States

Citation Formats

Backus, George A. Arctic 2030: What are the consequences of climate change?.. United States: N. p., 2012. Web. doi:10.1177/0096340212451568.
Backus, George A. Arctic 2030: What are the consequences of climate change?.. United States. doi:10.1177/0096340212451568.
Backus, George A. 2012. "Arctic 2030: What are the consequences of climate change?.". United States. doi:10.1177/0096340212451568.
title = {Arctic 2030: What are the consequences of climate change?.},
author = {Backus, George A.},
abstractNote = {},
doi = {10.1177/0096340212451568},
journal = {Proposed for publication in Bulletin on the Atomic Scientists.},
number = 4,
volume = 68,
place = {United States},
year = 2012,
month = 4
  • This study used scenarios of the HadCM2 GCM and the EPIC agroecosystem model to evaluate climate change impacts on crop yields and ecosystem processes. Baseline climate data were obtained from records for 1961-1990. The scenario runs for 2025-2034 and 2090-2099 were extracted from a HadCM2 run. EPIC was run on 204 representative farms under current climate and two 10-y periods centered on 2030 and 2095, each at CO2 concentrations of 365 and 560 ppm. Texas, New Mexico, Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and California are projected to experience significant temperature increases by 2030. Slight cooling is expected by 2030 in Alabama, Florida,more » Maine, Montana, Idaho, and Utah. Larger areas are projected to experience increased warming by 2095. Uniform precipitation increases are expected by 2030 in the NE. These increases are predicted to expand to the eastern half of the country by 2095. EPIC simulated yield increases for the Great Lakes, Corn Belt and Northeast regions. Simulated yields of irrigated corn yields were predicted to increase in almost all regions. Soybean yields could decrease in the Northern and Southern Plains, the Corn Belt, Delta, Appalachian, and Southeast regions and increase in the Lakes and Northeast regions. Simulated wheat yields exhibited upward yield trends under scenarios of climate change. National corn production in 2030 and 2095 could be affected by changes in three major producing regions. In 2030, corn production could increase in the Corn Belt and Lakes regions but decrease in the Northern Plains leading to an overall decrease in national production. National wheat production is expected to increase during both future periods. A proxy indicator was developed to provide a sense of where in the country, and when water would be available to satisfy change in irrigation demand for corn and alfalfa production as these are influenced by the HadCM2 scenarios and CO2-fertilization.« less
  • A significant difference in net ecosystem carbon balance of wet sedge ecosystems in the Barrow, Alaska region was observed between CO{sub 2} flux measurements obtained during the International Biological Program in 1971 and measurements made during the 1991-1992 growing seasons. Currently, high-center polygons are net sources of CO{sub 2} to the atmosphere of {approx}14 gC{center_dot}m{sup {minus}2}{center_dot}yr{sup {minus}1}, while low-center polygons are losing {approx}3.6 gC{center_dot}m{sup {minus}2}{center_dot}yr{sup {minus}1}, and ice wedge habitats are accumulating 4.0 gC{center_dot}m{sup {minus}2}{center_dot}yr{sup {minus}1}. On average, moist meadow habitats characteristic of the IBP-II site are currently sources of {approx}1.3 gC{center_dot}m{sup {minus}2}{center_dot}yr{sup {minus}1} to the atmosphere compared to themore » reported accumulation of {approx}25 gC{center_dot}m{sup {minus}2}{center_dot}yr{sup {minus}1} determined in 1971. This difference in ecosystem function over the last two decades may be due to the recently reported increase in surface temperatures resulting in decreases in the soil moisture status. These results point to the importance of long-term research sites and databases for determining the potential effects of climate change on ecosystem function. 44 refs., 10 figs., 1 tab.« less
  • Regional climate change impact (CCI) studies have widely involved downscaling and bias-correcting (BC) Global Climate Model (GCM)-projected climate for driving land surface models. However, BC may cause uncertainties in projecting hydrologic and biogeochemical responses to future climate due to the impaired spatiotemporal covariance of climate variables and a breakdown of physical conservation principles. Here we quantify the impact of BC on simulated climate-driven changes in water variables(evapotranspiration, ET; runoff; snow water equivalent, SWE; and water demand for irrigation), crop yield, biogenic volatile organic compounds (BVOC), nitric oxide (NO) emissions, and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) export over the Pacific Northwest (PNW)more » Region. We also quantify the impacts on net primary production (NPP) over a small watershed in the region (HJ Andrews). Simulation results from the coupled ECHAM5/MPI-OM model with A1B emission scenario were firstly dynamically downscaled to 12 km resolutions with WRF model. Then a quantile mapping based statistical downscaling model was used to downscale them into 1/16th degree resolution daily climate data over historical and future periods. Two series climate data were generated according to the option of bias-correction (i.e. with bias-correction (BC) and without bias-correction, NBC). Impact models were then applied to estimate hydrologic and biogeochemical responses to both BC and NBC meteorological datasets. These im20 pact models include a macro-scale hydrologic model (VIC), a coupled cropping system model (VIC-CropSyst), an ecohydrologic model (RHESSys), a biogenic emissions model (MEGAN), and a nutrient export model (Global-NEWS). Results demonstrate that the BC and NBC climate data provide consistent estimates of the climate-driven changes in water fluxes (ET, runoff, and water demand), VOCs (isoprene and monoterpenes) and NO emissions, mean crop yield, and river DIN export over the PNW domain. However, significant differences rise from projected SWE, crop yield from dry lands, and HJ Andrews’s ET between BC and NBC data. Even though BC post-processing has no significant impacts on most of the studied variables when taking PNW as a whole, their effects have large spatial variations and some local areas are substantially influenced. In addition, there are months during which BC and NBC post-processing produces significant differences in projected changes, such as summer runoff. Factor-controlled simulations indicate that BC post-processing of precipitation and temperature both substantially contribute to these differences at region scales. We conclude that there are trade-offs between using BC climate data for offline CCI studies vs. direct modeled climate data. These trade-offs should be considered when designing integrated modeling frameworks for specific applications; e.g., BC may be more important when considering impacts on reservoir operations in mountainous watersheds than when investigating impacts on biogenic emissions and air quality (where VOCs are a primary indicator).« less
  • This paper looks at global aspects of climatic change from the prospective of the current Arctic climate, with the potential effects of even small shifts in climate, and the evidence Earth is experiencing an interglacial period. This is a period of unusual climatic stability when we compare the last 10,000 years to the preceding 200,000. According to the authors there are few if any comparable times in the climatic record. A discussion of oceans as the key to understanding global climate change is presented. Climate is considered as a matter of cycles but also a matter of threshold effects. 14more » refs., 2 figs.« less