skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The European land and inland water CO2, CO, CH4 and N2O balance between 2001 and 2005

Journal Article · · Biogeosciences
 [1];  [2];  [3];  [4];  [1];  [5];  [1];  [1];  [6];  [5];  [7];  [8];  [9];  [1];  [5];  [10];  [11];  [1];  [12];  [13] more »;  [10];  [14];  [1];  [15];  [16];  [1];  [17];  [11];  [18];  [11];  [1];  [1];  [19];  [1];  [20];  [21];  [11] « less
  1. CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, LSCE
  2. Laboratoire EPOC, CNRS
  3. ORNL
  4. Linkoping University
  5. European Commission Joint Research Centre
  6. LSCE/CEA, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
  7. Johann Heinrich von Thünen Institute
  8. Alpen-Adria Universitaet Klagenfurt-Vienna-Graz
  9. Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia
  10. University of Hamburg
  11. Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry
  12. Finnish Meteorological institute
  13. University of Washington
  14. University of Antwerp
  15. University of Tuscia
  16. Wageningen University and Research Centre, The Netherlands
  17. Yale School of Forestry and Environmental Studies
  18. University of Eastern Finland
  19. European Forest Institute
  20. Peking University
  21. Helmholtz Centre Potsdam GFZ German Research Centre For Geosciences

Globally, terrestrial ecosystems have absorbed about 30% of anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions over the period 2000-2007 and inter-hemispheric gradients indicate that a significant fraction of terrestrial carbon sequestration must be north of the Equator. We present a compilation of the CO{sub 2}, CO, CH{sub 4} and N{sub 2}O balances of Europe following a dual constraint approach in which (1) a land-based balance derived mainly from ecosystem carbon inventories and (2) a land-based balance derived from flux measurements are compared to (3) the atmospheric data-based balance derived from inversions constrained by measurements of atmospheric GHG (greenhouse gas) concentrations. Good agreement between the GHG balances based on fluxes (1294 {+-} 545 Tg C in CO{sub 2}-eq yr{sup -1}), inventories (1299 {+-} 200 Tg C in CO{sub 2}-eq yr{sup -1}) and inversions (1210 {+-} 405 Tg C in CO{sub 2}-eq yr{sup -1}) increases our confidence that the processes underlying the European GHG budget are well understood and reasonably sampled. However, the uncertainty remains large and largely lacks formal estimates. Given that European net land to atmosphere exchanges are determined by a few dominant fluxes, the uncertainty of these key components needs to be formally estimated before efforts could be made to reduce the overall uncertainty. The net land-to-atmosphere flux is a net source for CO{sub 2}, CO, CH{sub 4} and N{sub 2}O, because the anthropogenic emissions by far exceed the biogenic sink strength. The dual-constraint approach confirmed that the European biogenic sink removes as much as 205 {+-} 72 Tg C yr{sup -1} from fossil fuel burning from the atmosphere. However, This C is being sequestered in both terrestrial and inland aquatic ecosystems. If the C-cost for ecosystem management is taken into account, the net uptake of ecosystems is estimated to decrease by 45% but still indicates substantial C-sequestration. However, when the balance is extended from CO{sub 2} towards the main GHGs, C-uptake by terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems is offset by emissions of non-CO{sub 2} GHGs. As such, the European ecosystems are unlikely to contribute to mitigating the effects of climate change.

Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
DOE Contract Number:
DE-AC05-00OR22725
OSTI ID:
1049933
Journal Information:
Biogeosciences, Vol. 9, Issue 8; ISSN 1726-4189
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English