skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The Geotechnical Board National Research Council. [Annual] activities report, March 1, 1991--June 30, 1992

Abstract

This report covers the activities of the Geotechnical Board and its two national committees, the US National Committee for Rock Mechanics (USNC/RM) and the US National Committee on Tunneling Technology (USNC/TT), for the period from March 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992. The report covers a 16-month period, through June of this year, to bring the reporting period in line with the National Research Council`s (NRC) fiscal year. Subsequent reports will cover the 12-month period July 1--June 30, unless individual contracts require otherwise. A description of the Geotechnical Board and its committees within the context of the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, as well as lists of current members of the board and national committees can be found in Attachment A.

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
National Academy of Sciences - National Research Council, Washington, DC (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)
OSTI Identifier:
10172954
Report Number(s):
DOE/RW/00214-T1
ON: DE93019090
DOE Contract Number:
FG01-90RW00214
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Resource Relation:
Other Information: PBD: 11 Aug 1993
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
01 COAL, LIGNITE, AND PEAT; ROCK MECHANICS; US ORGANIZATIONS; MEETINGS; TUNNELING; PROGRESS REPORT; 012031; STRATA MECHANICS AND CONTROL

Citation Formats

Smeallie, P.H. The Geotechnical Board National Research Council. [Annual] activities report, March 1, 1991--June 30, 1992. United States: N. p., 1993. Web. doi:10.2172/10172954.
Smeallie, P.H. The Geotechnical Board National Research Council. [Annual] activities report, March 1, 1991--June 30, 1992. United States. doi:10.2172/10172954.
Smeallie, P.H. 1993. "The Geotechnical Board National Research Council. [Annual] activities report, March 1, 1991--June 30, 1992". United States. doi:10.2172/10172954. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/10172954.
@article{osti_10172954,
title = {The Geotechnical Board National Research Council. [Annual] activities report, March 1, 1991--June 30, 1992},
author = {Smeallie, P.H.},
abstractNote = {This report covers the activities of the Geotechnical Board and its two national committees, the US National Committee for Rock Mechanics (USNC/RM) and the US National Committee on Tunneling Technology (USNC/TT), for the period from March 1, 1991 to June 30, 1992. The report covers a 16-month period, through June of this year, to bring the reporting period in line with the National Research Council`s (NRC) fiscal year. Subsequent reports will cover the 12-month period July 1--June 30, unless individual contracts require otherwise. A description of the Geotechnical Board and its committees within the context of the National Academy of Sciences/National Research Council, as well as lists of current members of the board and national committees can be found in Attachment A.},
doi = {10.2172/10172954},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = 1993,
month = 8
}

Technical Report:

Save / Share:
  • The Geotechnical Board, a part of the US National Research Council, which is the operating arm of the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering, serves to advise the federal government and others on issues where geotechnology can have an impact, such as environmental remediation and infrastructure development. The board met three times during the reporting period to review current projects and to initiate activities that move the knowledge base of geotechnology forward. The board operates with two long-standing national committees, the US National Committee for Rock Mechanics and the US National Committee on Tunneling Technology. Itmore » also conducts special studies at the request of the government. A list of attachments is given.« less
  • This progress report relates progress in the various research projects evaluating the late health effects, both somatic and genetic, resulting from radiation exposure of the survivors of the atomic bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Considerable progress has been made in the collection and utilization of the various epidemiological data bases. These include the Life Span Study, (LSS) cohort, the Adult Health Study (AHS) cohort, the In Utero cohort, the leukemia registry and the F-1 Study population. Important progress has been made in using RERF Tumor and Tissue Registry records for evaluation of cancer incidence and radiation risk estimates formore » comparison with cancer mortality and risk in the LSS cohort. At the present time, a manuscript on the incidence of solid tumors (1950-1987) is undergoing internal and external review for publication as an RERF Technical report (TR) and for publication in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. In addition, manuscripts are in preparation on (1) a comprehensive report on the incidence of hematological cancers, including analysis of leukemia by cell type (1950-1987), (2) a general description of Tumor Registry operations and (3) a comparison of incidence- and mortality-based estimates of radiation risk in the LSS cohort.« less
  • The Board provides a locus of activity and concern at the National Research Council for issues affecting the mathematical sciences; represents the mathematical sciences to National Academy of Sciences (NAS); and provides a forum for the NAS, government agencies, and the mathematical sciences community. In 1986, the Board sponsored the first of an annual series of symposia in conjunction with National Science and Technology Week. The Board also began in cooperation with NRC Mathematical Sciences Education Board a comprehensive study of university mathematics concerns (MS 2000 Project). Other committees and colloquia are also discussed.
  • The major accomplishment of the past year in the Roundtable`s continuing work on issues of concern to the academic enterprise is the preparation of two documents - Science and Technology in the Academic Enterprise: Status, Trends, and Issues and Perspectives on Financing Academic Research Facilities: A Resource for Policy Formulation. The significance of these two publications is that they both organize a large amount of complex and often controversial material in a way that is useful for further discussions and, in some cases, action by the government and higher education communities. The test for the Roundtable now is whether itmore » can stimulate these follow-on activities. The model in this regard is the Federal Demonstration Project, where the Roundtable stimulated specific government-university joint actions in streamlining research grant administration. All of these activities are described below in greater detail.« less
  • Each year, Gas Research Institute (GRI) conducts an energy seminar for its Board of Directors and Advisory Council on an issue of timely importance to the gas industry. The topic selected for the Twelfth Annual GRI Energy Seminar was 'Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990: Impacts on Natural Gas Markets.' The two sessions of the seminar focused upon the sectors of the energy market most significantly affected by the legislation. Session I: Fuel Choices for Stationary Applications explored the impact of the Clean Air Act Amendments upon stationary, fuel-burning applications, particularly power plants. The current outlook for bringing existing coal-firedmore » power plants into conformance with the law and the significance of the provisions for the choice of fuels for major future fuel-burning facilities were discussed, along with the impact of the provisions upon GRI's strategies and the technical and economic targets for ongoing R and D. Session II: The Emerging Alternative-Fuel Vehicle Market addressed the significance of the new requirements to the outlook for compressed natural gas vehicles and the suitability of GRI's methane vehicle R and D strategy to the revised outlook. The report summarizes the presentations and discussions at the seminar.« less