The pre-audit assessment: A homework assignment for auditors
The role of the quality assurance audit is evolving from compliance verification to a much broader assessment of programmatic and management performance. In the past, audits were poorly understood and caused fear and trepidation. Auditees turned an audit into a cat-and-mouse game using coverup strategies and decoy discrepancies. These games were meant to ``give the auditors what they want, namely a few findings that could later be easily corrected. At Pacific Northwest Laboratory (PNL), I observed auditing become a spectator sport. Matching a compliance-oriented auditor against a crafty group of scientists provided hours of entertainment. As a program manager, it was clear these games were neither productive useful nor cost effective. Fortunately, over the past few years several concepts embraced by ``total quality management` have begun to emerge at PNL. These concepts are being adopted by most successful organizations, and based on these concepts new tools and ideas are emerging to help organizations improve productivity and quality. Successful organizations have been and are continuing to develop management strategies that rely on participative approaches to their operations. These approaches encourage the empowerment of organization staff at all levels, with the goal of instilling ownership of quality in every staff member. As management philosophies are changing, so are the responsibilities and expectations of managers. Managers everywhere are experimenting with new tools to help them improve their operations and competitiveness. As the quality audit evolves, managers and other customers of the audit process have developed expectations for the auditing process that never existed in years past. These expectations have added complexity to the audit process. It is no longer adequate to prepare a checklist, perform the audit, and document the results. When viewed as a tool for verifying performance, a quality audit becomes more than a compliance checklist.
- Research Organization:
- Pacific Northwest Lab., Richland, WA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC06-76RL01830
- OSTI ID:
- 10143373
- Report Number(s):
- PNL-SA-22014; CONF-930278-3; ON: DE93010169
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: 1993 American Society for Quality Control (ASQC) audit conference,Charlotte, NC (United States),25-26 Feb 1993; Other Information: PBD: Feb 1993
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Technical auditors: A positive response for auditing
A formula for continued improvement: Audit follow-up