Statistical Analysis and Geologic Evaluation of Laboratory-Derived Physical Property Data for Selected Nevada Test Site Core Samples of Non-Zeolitized Tuffs
Abstract
A statistical analysis and geologic evaluation of recently acquired laboratory-derived physical property data are being performed to better understand and more precisely correlate physical properties with specific geologic parameters associated with non-zeolitized tuffs at the Nevada Test Site. Physical property data include wet and dry bulk density, grain density (i.e., specific gravity), total porosity, and effective porosity. Geologic parameters utilized include degree of welding, lithology, stratigraphy, geographic area, and matrix mineralogy (i.e., vitric versus devitrified). Initial results indicate a very good correlation between physical properties and geologic parameters such as degree of welding, lithology, and matrix mineralogy. However, physical properties appear to be independent of stratigraphy and geographic area, suggesting that the data are transferrable with regards to these two geologic parameters. Statistical analyses also indicate that the assumed grain density of 2.65 grams per cubic centimeter used to calculate porosity in some samples is too high. This results in corresponding calculated porosity values approximately 5 percent too high (e.g., 45 percent versus 40 percent), which can be significant in the lower porosity rocks. Similar analyses and evaluations of zeolitic tuffs and carbonate rock physical properties data are ongoing as well as comparisons to geophysical log values.
- Authors:
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- National Security Technologies, LLC (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NA)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 961541
- Report Number(s):
- DOE/NV/25946-714
TRN: US200917%%278
- DOE Contract Number:
- DE-AC52-06NA25946
- Resource Type:
- Conference
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: UGTA Technical Information Exchange Meeting; Desert Research Institute, Las Vegas, NV; April 20, 2009
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 58 GEOSCIENCES; BULK DENSITY; CARBONATE ROCKS; DESERTS; EVALUATION; GRAIN DENSITY; LITHOLOGY; MINERALOGY; NEVADA TEST SITE; PHYSICAL PROPERTIES; POROSITY; STRATIGRAPHY; WELDING; UGTA, physical properties, volcanic rocks
Citation Formats
NSTec Environmental Restoration. Statistical Analysis and Geologic Evaluation of Laboratory-Derived Physical Property Data for Selected Nevada Test Site Core Samples of Non-Zeolitized Tuffs. United States: N. p., 2009.
Web.
NSTec Environmental Restoration. Statistical Analysis and Geologic Evaluation of Laboratory-Derived Physical Property Data for Selected Nevada Test Site Core Samples of Non-Zeolitized Tuffs. United States.
NSTec Environmental Restoration. 2009.
"Statistical Analysis and Geologic Evaluation of Laboratory-Derived Physical Property Data for Selected Nevada Test Site Core Samples of Non-Zeolitized Tuffs". United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/961541.
@article{osti_961541,
title = {Statistical Analysis and Geologic Evaluation of Laboratory-Derived Physical Property Data for Selected Nevada Test Site Core Samples of Non-Zeolitized Tuffs},
author = {NSTec Environmental Restoration},
abstractNote = {A statistical analysis and geologic evaluation of recently acquired laboratory-derived physical property data are being performed to better understand and more precisely correlate physical properties with specific geologic parameters associated with non-zeolitized tuffs at the Nevada Test Site. Physical property data include wet and dry bulk density, grain density (i.e., specific gravity), total porosity, and effective porosity. Geologic parameters utilized include degree of welding, lithology, stratigraphy, geographic area, and matrix mineralogy (i.e., vitric versus devitrified). Initial results indicate a very good correlation between physical properties and geologic parameters such as degree of welding, lithology, and matrix mineralogy. However, physical properties appear to be independent of stratigraphy and geographic area, suggesting that the data are transferrable with regards to these two geologic parameters. Statistical analyses also indicate that the assumed grain density of 2.65 grams per cubic centimeter used to calculate porosity in some samples is too high. This results in corresponding calculated porosity values approximately 5 percent too high (e.g., 45 percent versus 40 percent), which can be significant in the lower porosity rocks. Similar analyses and evaluations of zeolitic tuffs and carbonate rock physical properties data are ongoing as well as comparisons to geophysical log values.},
doi = {},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/961541},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Mon Apr 20 00:00:00 EDT 2009},
month = {Mon Apr 20 00:00:00 EDT 2009}
}