skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A brief comparison between grid based real space algorithms andspectrum algorithms for electronic structure calculations

Technical Report ·
DOI:https://doi.org/10.2172/929689· OSTI ID:929689

Quantum mechanical ab initio calculation constitutes the biggest portion of the computer time in material science and chemical science simulations. As a computer center like NERSC, to better serve these communities, it will be very useful to have a prediction for the future trends of ab initio calculations in these areas. Such prediction can help us to decide what future computer architecture can be most useful for these communities, and what should be emphasized on in future supercomputer procurement. As the size of the computer and the size of the simulated physical systems increase, there is a renewed interest in using the real space grid method in electronic structure calculations. This is fueled by two factors. First, it is generally assumed that the real space grid method is more suitable for parallel computation for its limited communication requirement, compared with spectrum method where a global FFT is required. Second, as the size N of the calculated system increases together with the computer power, O(N) scaling approaches become more favorable than the traditional direct O(N{sup 3}) scaling methods. These O(N) methods are usually based on localized orbital in real space, which can be described more naturally by the real space basis. In this report, the author compares the real space methods versus the traditional plane wave (PW) spectrum methods, for their technical pros and cons, and the possible of future trends. For the real space method, the author focuses on the regular grid finite different (FD) method and the finite element (FE) method. These are the methods used mostly in material science simulation. As for chemical science, the predominant methods are still Gaussian basis method, and sometime the atomic orbital basis method. These two basis sets are localized in real space, and there is no indication that their roles in quantum chemical simulation will change anytime soon. The author focuses on the density functional theory (DFT), which is the most used method for quantum mechanical material science simulation.

Research Organization:
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Director. Office of Science. Advanced ScientificComputing Research
DOE Contract Number:
DE-AC02-05CH11231
OSTI ID:
929689
Report Number(s):
LBNL-63794; R&D Project: KX1310; BnR: KJ0102000; TRN: US0806641
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Algorithm advances and applications of time‐dependent first‐principles simulations for ultrafast dynamics
Journal Article · Fri Oct 01 00:00:00 EDT 2021 · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Molecular Science · OSTI ID:929689

Reply to Comment on "Ab Initio Study of 40Ca with an Importance Truncated No-Core Shell Model"
Journal Article · Fri Jan 04 00:00:00 EST 2008 · Physical Review Letters · OSTI ID:929689

Electronic structure calculations on a real-space mesh with multigrid acceleration
Conference · Tue Dec 31 00:00:00 EST 1996 · OSTI ID:929689