skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: ANALYSIS OF WIGNER ENERGY IN BGRR GRAPHITE.

Abstract

Wigner Energy was determined by DSC analysis in cored graphite from the Brookhaven Graphite Research Reactor. Eight segments (4-inch long slugs) of cores were obtained from BGRR for analysis of Wigner Energy retained in the graphite. Graphite was scraped from each end of each slug giving two samples from each specimen. Between 10 and 20 mg of this graphite powder were weighed into platinum analysis cells and subjected to thermal analysis on a Shimadzu Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC-50). The samples were annealed in nitrogen up to 700 C at a scan rate of 20 C/minute with data recorded at one second intervals. Each sample was run twice; the first scan provided the energy profile of the ''as received'' material and the second scan provided the background energy profile of the specimen, as the Wigner Energy had been removed during the first annealing. An example is shown in Figure 1. The blank was subtracted from the initial scan to give the Wigner energy profile. The appendix contains two graphs for each sample. One graph presents the data in J/s/g and shows the results of the two scans described above; the energy measurement of the ''as received'' and the same sample aftermore » annealing. The other graph presents the data in J/g/K, which was calculated by subtracting the background scan data from the first scan and dividing by the heating rate. The heating rate was nominally 20 K /minute (0.333K/s), however regression analysis provided a more accurate heating rate of 0.3506 K/s and this was used to determine J/g/K. These values were plotted against temperature in C. From these plots the temperature at which energy release increases can be determined. The data (J/s/g) were summed providing a measure of total Wigner energy in the sample in Joules per gram. The DSC analysis gives energy content of the graphite that ranges from around 0 (actual measurements of samples from Loc 4 slug 3 were -2.9 and -21.2 J/g) to 212 J/g. Table 1 gives the location and the total energy content of each sample. Figure 2 contains background subtracted scans showing two groups of peak energy release rates. The group with the greatest release rates peaks between 250 and 260 C. These samples, with the greatest amount of stored energy, reached their maximum release rate within about 100 C of the start of release; peaking at about 1 J/g/K at analysis temperatures of 255 C. The other group had much slower approaches to their maximum release rates and only reached it between 300 and 350 C. Almost all samples began to show energy release at about 150 C. Below this temperature very little if any energy was released. A sample of reactor graphite that had not been irradiated had a similar temperature profile to the background (annealed) samples (not shown). Comparing four samples that show high energy deposition in Figure 3, the temperature at the initial release of energy is similar (about 150 C) and the peak heights for maximum energy release are also similar. There are differences in total energy release (e.g. 13A slugs 9a and b are 211 and 123 J/g respectively) which is the result of higher energy in the later portion of the scan; from about 300 C to 700 C. The samples taken from Location 4 slug number 3 show no Wigner energy. The initial scan and the subsequent blank scan are essentially identical, with energy deposition of -2.9 and -21.2 J/g. Table 2 shows the total energy measured in four background subtracted replicates of the sample from Location 13A slug 19a. The mean of the four replicates was 101 J/g with a standard deviation of 30. These scans are also shown in Figure 4 where they are compared to one of the high energy scans.« less

Authors:
Publication Date:
Research Org.:
Brookhaven National Lab. (BNL), Upton, NY (United States)
Sponsoring Org.:
DOE/SC
OSTI Identifier:
895871
Report Number(s):
BNL-77205-2006-IR
R&D Project: 13772; TRN: US0700543
DOE Contract Number:  
DE-AC02-98CH10886
Resource Type:
Technical Report
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English
Subject:
22 GENERAL STUDIES OF NUCLEAR REACTORS; ANNEALING; BGRR REACTOR; CALORIMETERS; GRAPHITE; HEATING RATE; NITROGEN; PLATINUM; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STORED ENERGY; THERMAL ANALYSIS; WIGNER ENERGY, GRAPHITE, BGRR

Citation Formats

FUHRMANN, M. ANALYSIS OF WIGNER ENERGY IN BGRR GRAPHITE.. United States: N. p., 2006. Web. doi:10.2172/895871.
FUHRMANN, M. ANALYSIS OF WIGNER ENERGY IN BGRR GRAPHITE.. United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/895871
FUHRMANN, M. 2006. "ANALYSIS OF WIGNER ENERGY IN BGRR GRAPHITE.". United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/895871. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/895871.
@article{osti_895871,
title = {ANALYSIS OF WIGNER ENERGY IN BGRR GRAPHITE.},
author = {FUHRMANN, M},
abstractNote = {Wigner Energy was determined by DSC analysis in cored graphite from the Brookhaven Graphite Research Reactor. Eight segments (4-inch long slugs) of cores were obtained from BGRR for analysis of Wigner Energy retained in the graphite. Graphite was scraped from each end of each slug giving two samples from each specimen. Between 10 and 20 mg of this graphite powder were weighed into platinum analysis cells and subjected to thermal analysis on a Shimadzu Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC-50). The samples were annealed in nitrogen up to 700 C at a scan rate of 20 C/minute with data recorded at one second intervals. Each sample was run twice; the first scan provided the energy profile of the ''as received'' material and the second scan provided the background energy profile of the specimen, as the Wigner Energy had been removed during the first annealing. An example is shown in Figure 1. The blank was subtracted from the initial scan to give the Wigner energy profile. The appendix contains two graphs for each sample. One graph presents the data in J/s/g and shows the results of the two scans described above; the energy measurement of the ''as received'' and the same sample after annealing. The other graph presents the data in J/g/K, which was calculated by subtracting the background scan data from the first scan and dividing by the heating rate. The heating rate was nominally 20 K /minute (0.333K/s), however regression analysis provided a more accurate heating rate of 0.3506 K/s and this was used to determine J/g/K. These values were plotted against temperature in C. From these plots the temperature at which energy release increases can be determined. The data (J/s/g) were summed providing a measure of total Wigner energy in the sample in Joules per gram. The DSC analysis gives energy content of the graphite that ranges from around 0 (actual measurements of samples from Loc 4 slug 3 were -2.9 and -21.2 J/g) to 212 J/g. Table 1 gives the location and the total energy content of each sample. Figure 2 contains background subtracted scans showing two groups of peak energy release rates. The group with the greatest release rates peaks between 250 and 260 C. These samples, with the greatest amount of stored energy, reached their maximum release rate within about 100 C of the start of release; peaking at about 1 J/g/K at analysis temperatures of 255 C. The other group had much slower approaches to their maximum release rates and only reached it between 300 and 350 C. Almost all samples began to show energy release at about 150 C. Below this temperature very little if any energy was released. A sample of reactor graphite that had not been irradiated had a similar temperature profile to the background (annealed) samples (not shown). Comparing four samples that show high energy deposition in Figure 3, the temperature at the initial release of energy is similar (about 150 C) and the peak heights for maximum energy release are also similar. There are differences in total energy release (e.g. 13A slugs 9a and b are 211 and 123 J/g respectively) which is the result of higher energy in the later portion of the scan; from about 300 C to 700 C. The samples taken from Location 4 slug number 3 show no Wigner energy. The initial scan and the subsequent blank scan are essentially identical, with energy deposition of -2.9 and -21.2 J/g. Table 2 shows the total energy measured in four background subtracted replicates of the sample from Location 13A slug 19a. The mean of the four replicates was 101 J/g with a standard deviation of 30. These scans are also shown in Figure 4 where they are compared to one of the high energy scans.},
doi = {10.2172/895871},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/895871}, journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Tue Oct 31 00:00:00 EST 2006},
month = {Tue Oct 31 00:00:00 EST 2006}
}