CO{sub 2} HYDRATE PROCESS FOR GAS SEPARATION

Deppe, G; Currier, R; Spencer, D

doi:10.2172/823297

Title: CO{sub 2} HYDRATE PROCESS FOR GAS SEPARATION

Full Record
Other Related Research

Abstract

Modifications were implemented to the hydrogen flow test rig per safety review comments, and the apparatus was tested for leaks. Tests were then done using Helium/CO{sub 2} mixtures to re-verify performance prior to hydrogen testing. It was discovered that hydrate formation was more difficult to initiate, and new initiation methods were developed to improve the tests. Delivery of ETM hardware continued and buildup of the ETM system continued, the ETM is now mechanically complete. The STU (pilot plant) site selection process was resumed because Tennessee Eastman declined to participate in the program. Two potential sites were visited: The Global Energy/Conoco-Phillips Wabash River Plant, and the Tampa Electric Polk Power Plant.

Authors:: Deppe, G; Currier, R; Spencer, D

Publication Date:: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2004

Research Org.:: Nexant, Inc. (US)

Sponsoring Org.:: (US)

OSTI Identifier:: 823297

DOE Contract Number:: AC26-99FT40248

Resource Type:: Technical Report

Resource Relation:: Other Information: PBD: 1 Jan 2004

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Subject:: 08 HYDROGEN; BUILDUP; HYDRATES; HYDROGEN; MIXTURES; MODIFICATIONS; PERFORMANCE; POWER PLANTS; SAFETY; SITE SELECTION; TESTING

Citation Formats


                    Deppe, G, Currier, R, and Spencer, D. CO{sub 2} HYDRATE PROCESS FOR GAS SEPARATION.  United States: N. p., 2004. 
        Web.  doi:10.2172/823297.

Copy to clipboard


                    Deppe, G, Currier, R, & Spencer, D. CO{sub 2} HYDRATE PROCESS FOR GAS SEPARATION.  United States.  https://doi.org/10.2172/823297

Copy to clipboard


                    Deppe, G, Currier, R, and Spencer, D. 2004.  
        "CO{sub 2} HYDRATE PROCESS FOR GAS SEPARATION".  United States.  https://doi.org/10.2172/823297.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/823297.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_823297,

  title        = {CO{sub 2} HYDRATE PROCESS FOR GAS SEPARATION},

  author       = {Deppe, G and Currier, R and Spencer, D},

  abstractNote = {Modifications were implemented to the hydrogen flow test rig per safety review comments, and the apparatus was tested for leaks. Tests were then done using Helium/CO{sub 2} mixtures to re-verify performance prior to hydrogen testing. It was discovered that hydrate formation was more difficult to initiate, and new initiation methods were developed to improve the tests. Delivery of ETM hardware continued and buildup of the ETM system continued, the ETM is now mechanically complete. The STU (pilot plant) site selection process was resumed because Tennessee Eastman declined to participate in the program. Two potential sites were visited: The Global Energy/Conoco-Phillips Wabash River Plant, and the Tampa Electric Polk Power Plant.},

  doi          = {10.2172/823297},

  url          = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/823297},
  journal      = {},
number       = ,

  volume       = ,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2004},

  month        = {Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2004}

}

Copy to clipboard

Technical Report:

View Technical Report (0.16 MB)

https://doi.org/10.2172/823297

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar records in OSTI.GOV collections:

CO2 HYDRATE PROCESS FOR GAS SEPARATON

Technical Report Deppe, G; Currier, R; Spencer, D

This document reports on the activities of the second quarter, April through June, of 2003 for phase 2 of the project on syngas upgrading, a low temperature approach. Modifications were implemented to the hydrogen flow test rig per safety review comments. Delivery of ETM hardware continued and buildup of the ETM system continued. SIMTECHE analyzed the data from flow tests, provided input to the test plan and project review presentation and provided input to the facility requirements specification produced for Tennessee Eastman's consideration. Nexant also helped to analyze the flow test data, prepared the facility requirements specification for consideration bymore »« less
https://doi.org/10.2172/825554

Full Text Available
Simteche Hydrate CO2 Capture Process

Technical Report

As a result of an August 4, 2005 project review meeting held at Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL) to assess the project's technical progress, Nexant/Simteche/LANL project team was asked to meet four targets related to the existing project efforts. The four targets were to be accomplished by the September 30, 2006. These four targets were: (1) The CO{sub 2} hydrate process needs to show, through engineering and sensitivity analysis, that it can achieve 90% CO{sub 2} capture from the treated syngas stream, operating at 1000 psia. The cost should indicate the potential of achieving the Sequestration Program's cost target ofmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.2172/915435

Full Text Available
How and why Tampa Electric Company selected IGCC for its next generating capacity addition

Conference Pless, D - Proceedings of the American Power Conference; (United States)

As the title indicates, the purpose of this paper is to relate how and why Tampa Electric Company decided to select the Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) for their next capacity addition at Polk Power Station, Polk Unit No. 1. For a complete understanding of this process, it is necessary to review the history related to the initial formulation of the IGCC concept as it was proposed to the Department of Energy (DOE) Clean Coal Initiative Round Three. Further, it is important to understand the relationship between Tampa Electric Company and TECO Pay Services Corporation (TPS). TECO Energy, Inc. ismore »« less
Commercial-Scale Demonstration of the Liquid Phase Methanol (LPMEOH(TM)) Process

Technical Report

The Liquid Phase Methanol (LPMEOHTM) Demonstration Project at Kingsport, Tennessee, is a $213.7 million cooperative agreement between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) and Air Products Liquid Phase Conversion Company, L.P. (the Partnership). Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. (Air Products) and Eastman Chemical Company (Eastman) formed the Partnership to execute the Demonstration Project. The LPMEOIYM Process Demonstration Unit was built at a site located at the Eastman complex in Kingsport. During this quarter, comments from the DOE on the Topical Report "Economic Analysis - LPMEOHTM Process as an Add-on to IGCC for Coproduction" were received. A recommendation to continue withmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.2172/2728

Full Text Available
C1 Chemistry for the Production of Ultra-Clean Liquid Transportation Fuels and Hydrogen

Technical Report Huffman, Gerald

Professors and graduate students from five universities--the University of Kentucky, University of Pittsburgh, University of Utah, West Virginia University, and Auburn University--are collaborating in a research program to develop C1 chemistry processes to produce ultra-clean liquid transportation fuels and hydrogen, the zero-emissions transportation fuel of the future. The feedstocks contain one carbon atom per molecular unit. They include synthesis gas (syngas), a mixture of carbon monoxide and hydrogen produced by coal gasification or reforming of natural gas, methane, methanol, carbon dioxide, and carbon monoxide. An important objective is to develop C1 technology for the production of liquid transportation fuel andmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.2172/899854

Full Text Available

Similar Records