Military Ecological Risk Assessment Framework (MERAF) for Assessment of Risks of Military Training and Testing to Natural Resources
Abstract
The objective of this research is to provide the DoD with a framework based on a systematic, risk-based approach to assess impacts for management of natural resources in an ecosystem context. This risk assessment framework is consistent with, but extends beyond, the EPA's ecological risk assessment framework, and specifically addresses DoD activities and management needs. MERAF is intended to be consistent with existing procedures for environmental assessment and planning with DoD testing and training. The intention is to supplement these procedures rather than creating new procedural requirements. MERAF is suitable for use for training and testing area assessment and management. It does not include human health risks nor does it address specific permitting or compliance requirements, although it may be useful in some of these cases. Use of MERAF fits into the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process by providing a consistent and rigorous way of organizing and conducting the technical analysis for Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) (Sigal 1993; Carpenter 1995; Canter and Sadler 1997). It neither conflicts with, nor replaces, procedural requirements within the NEPA process or document management processes already in place within DoD.
- Authors:
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- US Department of Defense (US)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 814512
- Report Number(s):
- ORNL/TM-2002/295
TRN: US200317%%266
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-00OR22725
- Resource Type:
- Technical Report
- Resource Relation:
- Other Information: PBD: 18 Jun 2003
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY; 99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS//MATHEMATICS, COMPUTING, AND INFORMATION SCIENCE; COMPLIANCE; ECOSYSTEMS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS; MANAGEMENT; ORGANIZING; PLANNING; RISK ASSESSMENT; TESTING; TRAINING; US NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT
Citation Formats
Suter, II, G W. Military Ecological Risk Assessment Framework (MERAF) for Assessment of Risks of Military Training and Testing to Natural Resources. United States: N. p., 2003.
Web. doi:10.2172/814512.
Suter, II, G W. Military Ecological Risk Assessment Framework (MERAF) for Assessment of Risks of Military Training and Testing to Natural Resources. United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/814512
Suter, II, G W. 2003.
"Military Ecological Risk Assessment Framework (MERAF) for Assessment of Risks of Military Training and Testing to Natural Resources". United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/814512. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/814512.
@article{osti_814512,
title = {Military Ecological Risk Assessment Framework (MERAF) for Assessment of Risks of Military Training and Testing to Natural Resources},
author = {Suter, II, G W},
abstractNote = {The objective of this research is to provide the DoD with a framework based on a systematic, risk-based approach to assess impacts for management of natural resources in an ecosystem context. This risk assessment framework is consistent with, but extends beyond, the EPA's ecological risk assessment framework, and specifically addresses DoD activities and management needs. MERAF is intended to be consistent with existing procedures for environmental assessment and planning with DoD testing and training. The intention is to supplement these procedures rather than creating new procedural requirements. MERAF is suitable for use for training and testing area assessment and management. It does not include human health risks nor does it address specific permitting or compliance requirements, although it may be useful in some of these cases. Use of MERAF fits into the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process by providing a consistent and rigorous way of organizing and conducting the technical analysis for Environmental Impact Statements (EISs) (Sigal 1993; Carpenter 1995; Canter and Sadler 1997). It neither conflicts with, nor replaces, procedural requirements within the NEPA process or document management processes already in place within DoD.},
doi = {10.2172/814512},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/814512},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jun 18 00:00:00 EDT 2003},
month = {Wed Jun 18 00:00:00 EDT 2003}
}