Synchrotron radiation induced x-ray micro analysis: A realistic alternative for electron- and ion beam microscopy
Abstract
Synchrotron Radiation induced X-ray micro Fluorescence analysis ([mu]-SRXRF) is compared with more conventional microanalytical techniques such as Secondary Ion Microscopy (SIMS) and Electron Probe X-ray Microanalysis (EPXMA) for two typical microanalytical applications. SRXRF and EPXMA are employed for the analysis of individual particles, showing the complementary character of both techniques. By means of element mapping of trace constituents in a heterogeneous feldspar, the strong and weak points of SRXRF in comparison to EPXMA and SIMS are illustrated. The most striking difference between SRXRF and the other two microanalytical methods is the ability of SRXRF to probe deep into the investigated Material, whereas SIMS and EPXMA only investigate the upper surface of the material. The possibilities of SRXRF at third generation synchrotron rings is also briefly discussed.
- Authors:
-
- Universitaire Instelling Antwerpen, Antwerp (Belgium). Dept. of Chemistry
- Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Brookhaven National Lab., Upton, NY (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE; National Science Foundation (NSF); BENSF; USDOE, Washington, DC (United States); National Science Foundation, Washington, DC (United States); Belgian National Science Fund (Belgium)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 6966613
- Report Number(s):
- BNL-48003; CONF-9208150-1
ON: DE93001975; CNN: Nr. 2009291N; EAR 89-14669
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC02-76CH00016
- Resource Type:
- Conference
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: 27. annual meeting of the Microbeam Analysis Society (MAS) (United States) and the 19th annual meeting of the Microscopical Society of Canada (MSC), Boston, MA (United States), Aug 1992; Other Information: To be published in The Microbeam Analysis Journal
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 75 CONDENSED MATTER PHYSICS, SUPERCONDUCTIVITY AND SUPERFLUIDITY; 43 PARTICLE ACCELERATORS; ELECTRON MICROPROBE ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS; ION MICROSCOPY; X-RAY FLUORESCENCE ANALYSIS; AEROSOLS; ALUMINIUM; ELEMENTS; FLUORESCENCE SPECTROSCOPY; IRON; MULTI-ELEMENT ANALYSIS; POTASSIUM; SENSITIVITY; SILICON; SODIUM; SYNCHROTRON RADIATION; TRACE AMOUNTS; ALKALI METALS; BREMSSTRAHLUNG; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; COLLOIDS; DISPERSIONS; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION; EMISSION SPECTROSCOPY; EVALUATION; METALS; MICROANALYSIS; MICROSCOPY; NONDESTRUCTIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATIONS; SEMIMETALS; SOLS; SPECTROSCOPY; TRANSITION ELEMENTS; X-RAY EMISSION ANALYSIS; 665100* - Nuclear Techniques in Condensed Matter Physics - (1992-); 430400 - Particle Accelerators- Storage Rings
Citation Formats
Janssens, K, Adams, F, Rivers, M L, and Jones, K W. Synchrotron radiation induced x-ray micro analysis: A realistic alternative for electron- and ion beam microscopy. United States: N. p., 1992.
Web.
Janssens, K, Adams, F, Rivers, M L, & Jones, K W. Synchrotron radiation induced x-ray micro analysis: A realistic alternative for electron- and ion beam microscopy. United States.
Janssens, K, Adams, F, Rivers, M L, and Jones, K W. 1992.
"Synchrotron radiation induced x-ray micro analysis: A realistic alternative for electron- and ion beam microscopy". United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6966613.
@article{osti_6966613,
title = {Synchrotron radiation induced x-ray micro analysis: A realistic alternative for electron- and ion beam microscopy},
author = {Janssens, K and Adams, F and Rivers, M L and Jones, K W},
abstractNote = {Synchrotron Radiation induced X-ray micro Fluorescence analysis ([mu]-SRXRF) is compared with more conventional microanalytical techniques such as Secondary Ion Microscopy (SIMS) and Electron Probe X-ray Microanalysis (EPXMA) for two typical microanalytical applications. SRXRF and EPXMA are employed for the analysis of individual particles, showing the complementary character of both techniques. By means of element mapping of trace constituents in a heterogeneous feldspar, the strong and weak points of SRXRF in comparison to EPXMA and SIMS are illustrated. The most striking difference between SRXRF and the other two microanalytical methods is the ability of SRXRF to probe deep into the investigated Material, whereas SIMS and EPXMA only investigate the upper surface of the material. The possibilities of SRXRF at third generation synchrotron rings is also briefly discussed.},
doi = {},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6966613},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1992},
month = {Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1992}
}