A Field Evaluation of Airborne Techniques for Detection of Unexploded Ordnance
Abstract
US Defense Department estimates indicate that as many as 11 million acres of government land in the U. S. may contain unexploded ordnance (UXO), with the cost of identifying and disposing of this material estimated at nearly $500 billion. The size and character of the ordnance, types of interference, vegetation, geology, and topography vary from site to site. Because of size or composition, some ordnance is difficult to detect with any geophysical method, even under favorable soil and cultural interference conditions. For some sites, airborne methods may provide the most time and cost effective means for detection of UXO. Airborne methods offer lower risk to field crews from proximity to unstable ordnance, and less disturbance of sites that maybe environmentally sensitive. Data were acquired over a test site at Edwards AFB, CA using airborne magnetic, electromagnetic, multispectral and thermal sensors. Survey areas included sites where trenches might occur, and a test site in which we placed deactivated ordnance, ranging in size from small ''bomblets'' to large bombs. Magnetic data were then acquired with the Aerodat HM-3 system, which consists of three cesium magnetometers within booms extending to the front and sides of the helicopter, and mounted such that the helicoptermore »
- Authors:
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE Office of Defense Programs (DP) (US)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 3914
- Report Number(s):
- ORNL/CP-101923; 47 WE 06 66 4
47 WE 06 66 4; TRN: AH200113%%173
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-96OR22464
- Resource Type:
- Conference
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Environmental and Engineering Problems, Oakland, CA (US), 03/14/1999--03/18/1999; Other Information: PBD: 14 Mar 1999
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 58 GEOSCIENCES; 98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION; DETECTION; EVALUATION; GEOPHYSICS; MILITARY EQUIPMENT; PLANTS
Citation Formats
Bell, D, Doll, W E, Hamlett, P, Holladay, J S, Nyquist, J E, Smyre, J, and Gamey, T J. A Field Evaluation of Airborne Techniques for Detection of Unexploded Ordnance. United States: N. p., 1999.
Web.
Bell, D, Doll, W E, Hamlett, P, Holladay, J S, Nyquist, J E, Smyre, J, & Gamey, T J. A Field Evaluation of Airborne Techniques for Detection of Unexploded Ordnance. United States.
Bell, D, Doll, W E, Hamlett, P, Holladay, J S, Nyquist, J E, Smyre, J, and Gamey, T J. 1999.
"A Field Evaluation of Airborne Techniques for Detection of Unexploded Ordnance". United States. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/3914.
@article{osti_3914,
title = {A Field Evaluation of Airborne Techniques for Detection of Unexploded Ordnance},
author = {Bell, D and Doll, W E and Hamlett, P and Holladay, J S and Nyquist, J E and Smyre, J and Gamey, T J},
abstractNote = {US Defense Department estimates indicate that as many as 11 million acres of government land in the U. S. may contain unexploded ordnance (UXO), with the cost of identifying and disposing of this material estimated at nearly $500 billion. The size and character of the ordnance, types of interference, vegetation, geology, and topography vary from site to site. Because of size or composition, some ordnance is difficult to detect with any geophysical method, even under favorable soil and cultural interference conditions. For some sites, airborne methods may provide the most time and cost effective means for detection of UXO. Airborne methods offer lower risk to field crews from proximity to unstable ordnance, and less disturbance of sites that maybe environmentally sensitive. Data were acquired over a test site at Edwards AFB, CA using airborne magnetic, electromagnetic, multispectral and thermal sensors. Survey areas included sites where trenches might occur, and a test site in which we placed deactivated ordnance, ranging in size from small ''bomblets'' to large bombs. Magnetic data were then acquired with the Aerodat HM-3 system, which consists of three cesium magnetometers within booms extending to the front and sides of the helicopter, and mounted such that the helicopter can be flown within 3m of the surface. Electromagnetic data were acquired with an Aerodat 5 frequency coplanar induction system deployed as a sling load from a helicopter, with a sensor altitude of 15m. Surface data, acquired at selected sites, provide a comparison with airborne data. Multispectral and thermal data were acquired with a Daedelus AADS 1268 system. Preliminary analysis of the test data demonstrate the value of airborne systems for UXO detection and provide insight into improvements that might make the systems even more effective.},
doi = {},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/3914},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sun Mar 14 00:00:00 EST 1999},
month = {Sun Mar 14 00:00:00 EST 1999}
}