Global Biogeochemistry Models and Global Carbon Cycle Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Abstract
The climate modeling community has long envisioned an evolution from physical climate models to ''earth system'' models that include the effects of biology and chemistry, particularly those processes related to the global carbon cycle. The widely reproduced Box 3, Figure 1 from the 2001 IPCC Scientific Assessment schematically describes that evolution. The community generally accepts the premise that understanding and predicting global and regional climate change requires the inclusion of carbon cycle processes in models to fully simulate the feedbacks between the climate system and the carbon cycle. Moreover, models will ultimately be employed to predict atmospheric concentrations of CO{sub 2} and other greenhouse gases as a function of anthropogenic and natural processes, such as industrial emissions, terrestrial carbon fixation, sequestration, land use patterns, etc. Nevertheless, the development of coupled climate-carbon models with demonstrable quantitative skill will require a significant amount of effort and time to understand and validate their behavior at both the process level and as integrated systems. It is important to consider objectively whether the currently proposed strategies to develop and validate earth system models are optimal, or even sufficient, and whether alternative strategies should be pursued. Carbon-climate models are going to be complex, with the carbonmore »
- Authors:
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- Lawrence Livermore National Lab. (LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- US Department of Energy (US)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 15016353
- Report Number(s):
- UCRL-TR-212604
TRN: US200513%%252
- DOE Contract Number:
- W-7405-ENG-48
- Resource Type:
- Technical Report
- Resource Relation:
- Other Information: PBD: 27 May 2005
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; BIOGEOCHEMISTRY; BIOLOGY; CARBON; CARBON CYCLE; CHEMISTRY; CLIMATE MODELS; CLIMATES; DIAGNOSIS; GREENHOUSE GASES; LAND USE; SIMULATION; TROPOSPHERE; VALIDATION
Citation Formats
Covey, C, Caldeira, K, Guilderson, T, Cameron-Smith, P, Govindasamy, B, Swanston, C, Wickett, M, Mirin, A, and Bader, D. Global Biogeochemistry Models and Global Carbon Cycle Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. United States: N. p., 2005.
Web. doi:10.2172/15016353.
Covey, C, Caldeira, K, Guilderson, T, Cameron-Smith, P, Govindasamy, B, Swanston, C, Wickett, M, Mirin, A, & Bader, D. Global Biogeochemistry Models and Global Carbon Cycle Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/15016353
Covey, C, Caldeira, K, Guilderson, T, Cameron-Smith, P, Govindasamy, B, Swanston, C, Wickett, M, Mirin, A, and Bader, D. 2005.
"Global Biogeochemistry Models and Global Carbon Cycle Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory". United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/15016353. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/15016353.
@article{osti_15016353,
title = {Global Biogeochemistry Models and Global Carbon Cycle Research at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory},
author = {Covey, C and Caldeira, K and Guilderson, T and Cameron-Smith, P and Govindasamy, B and Swanston, C and Wickett, M and Mirin, A and Bader, D},
abstractNote = {The climate modeling community has long envisioned an evolution from physical climate models to ''earth system'' models that include the effects of biology and chemistry, particularly those processes related to the global carbon cycle. The widely reproduced Box 3, Figure 1 from the 2001 IPCC Scientific Assessment schematically describes that evolution. The community generally accepts the premise that understanding and predicting global and regional climate change requires the inclusion of carbon cycle processes in models to fully simulate the feedbacks between the climate system and the carbon cycle. Moreover, models will ultimately be employed to predict atmospheric concentrations of CO{sub 2} and other greenhouse gases as a function of anthropogenic and natural processes, such as industrial emissions, terrestrial carbon fixation, sequestration, land use patterns, etc. Nevertheless, the development of coupled climate-carbon models with demonstrable quantitative skill will require a significant amount of effort and time to understand and validate their behavior at both the process level and as integrated systems. It is important to consider objectively whether the currently proposed strategies to develop and validate earth system models are optimal, or even sufficient, and whether alternative strategies should be pursued. Carbon-climate models are going to be complex, with the carbon cycle strongly interacting with many other components. Off-line process validation will be insufficient. As was found in coupled atmosphere-ocean GCMs, feedbacks between model components can amplify small errors and uncertainties in one process to produce large biases in the simulated climate. The persistent tropical western Pacific Ocean ''double ITCZ'' and upper troposphere ''cold pole'' problems are examples. Finding and fixing similar types of problems in coupled carbon-climate models especially will be difficult, given the lack of observations required for diagnosis and validation of biogeochemical processes.},
doi = {10.2172/15016353},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/15016353},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Fri May 27 00:00:00 EDT 2005},
month = {Fri May 27 00:00:00 EDT 2005}
}