Miscanthus biomass productivity within US croplands and its potential impact on soil organic carbon

Mishra, Umakant; Torn, Margaret S.; Fingerman, Kevin

doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01201.x

Title: Miscanthus biomass productivity within US croplands and its potential impact on soil organic carbon

Journal Article · Fri Aug 10 00:00:00 EDT 2012 · Global Change Biology. Bioenergy

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2012.01201.x· OSTI ID:1396036

Mishra, Umakant ^[1]; Torn, Margaret S. ^[2]; Fingerman, Kevin ^[3]

Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States). Environmental Science Division; Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). Earth Sciences Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States). Earth Sciences Division; Univ. of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (United States). Energy and Resources Group
Univ. of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA (United States). Energy and Resources Group

Interest in bioenergy crops is increasing due to their potential to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and dependence on fossil fuels. Here, we combined process-based and geospatial models to estimate the potential biomass productivity of miscanthus and its potential impact on soil carbon stocks in the croplands of the continental United States. The optimum (climatic potential) rainfed productivity for field-dried miscanthus biomass ranged from 1 to 23 Mg biomass ha^-1 yr^-1, with a spatial average of 13 Mg ha^-1 yr^-1 and a coefficient of variation of 30%. This variation resulted primarily from the spatial heterogeneity of effective rainfall, growing degree days, temperature, and solar radiation interception. Cultivating miscanthus would result in a soil organic carbon (SOC) sequestration at the rate of 0.16–0.82 Mg C ha^-1 yr^-1 across the croplands due to cessation of tillage and increased biomass carbon input into the soil system. We identified about 81 million ha of cropland, primarily in the eastern United States, that could sustain economically viable (>10 Mg ha^-1 yr^-1) production without supplemental irrigation, of which about 14 million ha would reach optimal miscanthus growth. To meet targets of the US Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 using miscanthus as feedstock, 19 million ha of cropland would be needed (spatial average 13 Mg ha^-1 yr^-1) or about 16% less than is currently dedicated to US corn-based ethanol production.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)

Grant/Contract Number:: AC02-06CH11357; AC02-05CH11231

OSTI ID:: 1396036

Journal Information:: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, Vol. 5, Issue 4; ISSN 1757-1693

Publisher:: WileyCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 43 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (39)

Energy- and greenhouse gas-based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: Key issues, ranges and recommendations Cherubini, Francesco; Bird, Neil D.; Cowie, Annette Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 53, Issue 8 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2009.03.013	journal	June 2009
Miscanthus biomass production for energy in Europe and its potential contribution to decreasing fossil fuel carbon emissions Clifton-brown, John C.; Stampfl, Paul F.; Jones, Michael B. Global Change Biology, Vol. 10, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1529-8817.2003.00749.x	journal	April 2004
Environmental, economic, and energetic costs and benefits of biodiesel and ethanol biofuels Hill, J.; Nelson, E.; Tilman, D. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 103, Issue 30 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0604600103	journal	July 2006
Changes in Soil Carbon Storage and Associated Properties with Disturbance and Recovery Schlesinger, William H. The Changing Carbon Cycle https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-1915-4_11	book	January 1986
Bioenergy and water—the implications of large-scale bioenergy production for water use and supply Berndes, Göran Global Environmental Change, Vol. 12, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-3780(02)00040-7	journal	December 2002
Changes in soil carbon inventories following cultivation of previously untilled soils Davidson, Eric A.; Ackerman, Ilse L. Biogeochemistry, Vol. 20, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00000786	journal	September 1993
Land-use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon Don, Axel; Osborne, Bruce; Hastings, Astley GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 4, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x	journal	September 2011
Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois Khanna, Madhu; Dhungana, Basanta; Clifton-Brown, John Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 32, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.003	journal	June 2008
Feedstocks for Lignocellulosic Biofuels Somerville, Cris; Youngs, Heather; Taylor, Caroline Science, Vol. 329, Issue 5993, p. 790-792 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189268	journal	August 2010
Changes in soil organic carbon under biofuel crops Anderson-Teixeira, Kristina J.; Davis, Sarah C.; Masters, Michael D. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 1, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2008.01001.x	journal	February 2009
European-wide GIS-based modelling system for quantifying the feedstock from Miscanthus and the potential contribution to renewable energy targets Stampfl, Paul F.; Clifton-Brown, John C.; Jones, Michael B. Global Change Biology, Vol. 13, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01419.x	journal	November 2007
Carbon mitigation by the energy crop, Miscanthus Clifton-Brown, John C.; Breuer, JÖErn; Jones, Michael B. Global Change Biology, Vol. 13, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01438.x	journal	November 2007
The potential of Miscanthus to sequester carbon in soils: comparing field measurements in Carlow, Ireland to model predictions Dondini, Marta; Hastings, Astley; Saiz, Gustavo GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 1, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01033.x	journal	December 2009
Environment and Harvest Time Affects the Combustion Qualities of Genotypes Lewandowski, I.; Clifton-Brown, J. C.; Andersson, B. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 95, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.1274	journal	January 2003
The modelled productivity of Miscanthus×giganteus (GREEF et DEU) in Ireland Clifton-Brown, J. C.; Neilson, B.; Lewandowski, I. Industrial Crops and Products, Vol. 12, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6690(00)00042-X	journal	August 2000
Carbon sequestration in soil beneath long-term Miscanthus plantations as determined by 13C abundance Hansen, E. M.; Christensen, B. T.; Jensen, L. S. Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 26, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00102-8	journal	February 2004
Predicting the Spatial Variation of the Soil Organic Carbon Pool at a Regional Scale Mishra, Umakant; Lal, Rattan; Liu, Desheng Soil Science Society of America Journal, Vol. 74, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2009.0158	journal	January 2010
Spatial and temporal distribution of the root system and root nutrient content of an established Miscanthus crop Neukirchen, D.; Himken, M.; Lammel, J. European Journal of Agronomy, Vol. 11, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1161-0301(99)00031-3	journal	November 1999
Water Use Efficiency and Biomass Partitioning of Three Different Miscanthus Genotypes with Limited and Unlimited Water Supply Clifton-Brown, J. Annals of Botany, Vol. 86, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.2000.1183	journal	July 2000
Carbon sequestration underMiscanthus in sandy and loamy soils estimated by natural13C abundance Schneckenberger, Katja; Kuzyakov, Yakov Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, Vol. 170, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200625111	journal	August 2007
Comparative Biogeochemical Cycles of Bioenergy Crops Reveal Nitrogen-Fixation and Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a Miscanthus × giganteus Agro-Ecosystem Davis, Sarah C.; Parton, William J.; Dohleman, Frank G. Ecosystems, Vol. 13, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-009-9306-9	journal	December 2009
Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK Rowe, Rebecca L.; Street, Nathaniel R.; Taylor, Gail Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008	journal	January 2009
Use of U.S. Croplands for Biofuels Increases Greenhouse Gases Through Emissions from Land-Use Change Searchinger, T.; Heimlich, R.; Houghton, R. A. Science, Vol. 319, Issue 5867 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151861	journal	February 2008
Biofuels, Land Use Change, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Some Unexplored Variables Kim, Hyungtae; Kim, Seungdo; Dale, Bruce E. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 43, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1021/es802681k	journal	February 2009
Accounting for the water impacts of ethanol production Fingerman, Kevin R.; Torn, Margaret S.; O’Hare, Michael H. Environmental Research Letters, Vol. 5, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/5/1/014020	journal	January 2010
The development of MISCANFOR, a new Miscanthus crop growth model: towards more robust yield predictions under different climatic and soil conditions Hastings, Astley; Clifton-Brown, John; Wattenbach, Martin GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 1, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01007.x	journal	April 2009
Bioenergy production potential of global biomass plantations under environmental and agricultural constraints: BIOENERGY PRODUCTION POTENTIAL OF GLOBAL BIOMASS PLANTATIONS Beringer, Tim; Lucht, Wolfgang; Schaphoff, Sibyll GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 3, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01088.x	journal	January 2011
The economical and environmental performance of miscanthus and switchgrass production and supply chains in a European setting Smeets, Edward M. W.; Lewandowski, Iris M.; Faaij, André P. C. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Vol. 13, Issue 6-7 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2008.09.006	journal	August 2009
Climate and the Efficiency of Crop Production in Britain [and Discussion] Monteith, J. L.; Moss, C. J. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, Vol. 281, Issue 980 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1977.0140	journal	November 1977
Life-Cycle Assessment of net Greenhouse-Gas flux for Bioenergy Cropping Systems Adler, Paul R.; Grosso, Stephen J. Del; Parton, William J. Ecological Applications, Vol. 17, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1890/05-2018	journal	April 2007
Grand Challenges for Life-Cycle Assessment of Biofuels McKone, T. E.; Nazaroff, W. W.; Berck, P. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1021/es103579c	journal	March 2011
DAYCENT model analysis of past and contemporary soil NO and net greenhouse gas flux for major crops in the USA Delgrosso, S.; Mosier, A.; Parton, W. Soil and Tillage Research, Vol. 83, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2005.02.007	journal	August 2005
Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus Heaton, Emily A.; Dohleman, Frank G.; Long, Stephen P. Global Change Biology, Vol. 14, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01662.x	journal	September 2008
An integrated biogeochemical and economic analysis of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States: BIOENERGY CROPS IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES Jain, Atul K.; Khanna, Madhu; Erickson, Matthew GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 2, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01041.x	journal	September 2010
The impact of extensive planting of Miscanthus as an energy crop on future CO2 atmospheric concentrations: GLOBAL MISCANTHUS PLANTATION AND ATMOSPHERIC CO2 Hughes, J. K.; Lloyd, A. J.; Huntingford, C. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 2, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01042.x	journal	April 2010
Carbon sequestration and saving potential associated with changes to the management of agricultural soils in England King, J. A.; King, J. A.; Bradley, R. I. Soil Use and Management, Vol. 20, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1079/SUM2004270	journal	December 2004
Miscanthus for Renewable Energy Generation: European Union Experience and Projections for Illinois Heaton, Emily A.; Clifton-Brown, John; Voigt, Thomas B. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 9, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MITI.0000038848.94134.be	journal	October 2004
Crop Residues: The Rest of the Story Karlen, Douglas L.; Lal, Rattan; Follett, Ronald F. Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 43, Issue 21 https://doi.org/10.1021/es9011004	journal	November 2009
The spatial prediction of soil mineral N and potentially available N using elevation Baxter, S. J.; Oliver, M. A. Geoderma, Vol. 128, Issue 3-4 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2005.04.013	journal	October 2005

Cited By (7)

Use of simulation-based statistical models to complement bioclimatic models in predicting continental scale invasion risks Muthukrishnan, Ranjan; Jordan, Nicholas R.; Davis, Adam S. Biological Invasions, Vol. 21, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-018-1864-3	journal	October 2018
Soil organic carbon and total nitrogen pools in permafrost zones of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau Zhao, Lin; Wu, Xiaodong; Wang, Zhiwei Scientific Reports, Vol. 8, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22024-2	journal	February 2018
Modelling the carbon cycle of Miscanthus plantations: existing models and the potential for their improvement Robertson, Andy D.; Davies, Christian A.; Smith, Pete GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 7, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12144	journal	March 2014
Phenomics analysis of drought responses in Miscanthus collected from different geographical locations Malinowska, Marta; Donnison, Iain S.; Robson, Paul R. H. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 9, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12350	journal	September 2016
Valuation of ecosystem services in alternative bioenergy landscape scenarios Mishra, Shruti K.; Negri, Maria Cristina; Kozak, Justin GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 11, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12602	journal	March 2019
Modeling the impact of agricultural land use and management on US carbon budgets Drewniak, B. A.; Mishra, U.; Song, J. Biogeosciences, Vol. 12, Issue 7 https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2119-2015	journal	January 2015
Modeling the impact of agricultural land use and management on US carbon budgets Drewniak, B. A.; Mishra, U.; Song, J. Biogeosciences Discussions, Vol. 11, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.5194/bgd-11-13675-2014	journal	January 2014

Similar Records

Multi-scale geospatial agroecosystem modeling: a case study on the influence of soil data resolution on carbon budget estimates

Journal Article · Thu May 01 00:00:00 EDT 2014 · Science of the Total Environment, 479:138-50 · OSTI ID:1396036

Zhang, Xuesong; Sahajpal, Ritvik; Manowitz, D.; +9 more

Data from: Carbon debt of Conservation Reserve Program (CRP) grasslands converted to bioenergy production

Dataset · Fri Nov 01 00:00:00 EDT 2019 · OSTI ID:1396036

Gelfand, Ilya; Zenone, Terenzio; Jasrotia, Poonam; +3 more

Modeling Yield, Biogenic Emissions, and Carbon Sequestration in Southeastern Cropping Systems With Winter Carinata

Journal Article · Wed Apr 13 00:00:00 EDT 2022 · Frontiers in Energy Research · OSTI ID:1396036

Field, John L.; Zhang, Yao; Marx, Ernie; +13 more

Related Subjects

09 BIOMASS FUELS
biofuel
biomass
carbon sequestration
cropland
miscanthus
soil organic carbon

Title: Miscanthus biomass productivity within US croplands and its potential impact on soil organic carbon

Citation Formats

References (39)

Cited By (7)

Similar Records

Related Subjects