Investment risk in bioenergy crops

Skevas, Theodoros; Swinton, Scott M.; Tanner, Sophia; Sanford, Gregg; Thelen, Kurt D.

doi:10.1111/gcbb.12320

Title: Investment risk in bioenergy crops

Journal Article · Wed Nov 18 00:00:00 EST 2015 · Global Change Biology. Bioenergy

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12320· OSTI ID:1363930

Skevas, Theodoros ^[1]; Swinton, Scott M. ^[2]; Tanner, Sophia ^[2]; Sanford, Gregg ^[3]; Thelen, Kurt D. ^[2]

Univ. of Florida, Wimauma, FL (United States)
Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI (United States)
Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI (United States)

Here, perennial, cellulosic bioenergy crops represent a risky investment. The potential for adoption of these crops depends not only on mean net returns, but also on the associated probability distributions and on the risk preferences of farmers. Using 6-year observed crop yield data from highly productive and marginally productive sites in the southern Great Lakes region and assuming risk neutrality, we calculate expected breakeven biomass yields and prices compared to corn (Zea mays L.) as a benchmark. Next we develop Monte Carlo budget simulations based on stochastic crop prices and yields. The crop yield simulations decompose yield risk into three components: crop establishment survival, time to maturity, and mature yield variability. Results reveal that corn with harvest of grain and 38% of stover (as cellulosic bioenergy feedstock) is both the most profitable and the least risky investment option. It dominates all perennial systems considered across a wide range of farmer risk preferences. Although not currently attractive for profit-oriented farmers who are risk neutral or risk averse, perennial bioenergy crops.

View Accepted Manuscript (DOE)

Cite

Export

Save

Research Organization:: Univ. of Florida, Wimauma, FL (United States)

Sponsoring Organization:: USDOE Office of Science (SC), Biological and Environmental Research (BER)

Grant/Contract Number:: FC02-07ER64494

OSTI ID:: 1363930

Journal Information:: Global Change Biology. Bioenergy, Vol. 8, Issue 6; ISSN 1757-1693

Publisher:: WileyCopyright Statement

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: English

Citation Metrics:

Cited by: 14 works

Citation information provided by
Web of Science

References (39)

A Real Options Approach for the Investment Decisions of a Farm-Based Anaerobic Digester: REAL OPTIONS APPROACH TO INVESTMENT ANALYSIS Anderson, Robert C.; Weersink, Alfons Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Vol. 62, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/cjag.12019	journal	September 2013
The adoption of switchgrass and miscanthus by farmers: Impact of liquidity constraints and risk preferences Bocquého, G.; Jacquet, F. Energy Policy, Vol. 38, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.01.005	journal	May 2010
A Model of Investment under Uncertainty: Modern Irrigation Technology and Emerging Markets in Water Carey, Janis M.; Zilberman, David American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 84, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8276.00251	journal	February 2002
Production and Investment Decisions Under Sunk Cost and Temporal Uncertainty Chavas, Jean‐Paul American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 76, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.2307/1243926	journal	February 1994
Organic and Conventional Production Systems in the Wisconsin Integrated Cropping Systems Trial: II. Economic and Risk Analysis 1993-2006 Chavas, Jean-Paul; Posner, Joshua L.; Hedtcke, Janet L. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 101, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2008.0055x	journal	March 2009
A stochastic analysis of the decision to produce biomass crops in Ireland Clancy, Daragh; Breen, James P.; Thorne, Fiona Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 46 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.08.005	journal	November 2012
Improving the Efficiency of Stochastic Dominance Techniques Using Convex Set Stochastic Dominance Cochran, Mark J.; Robison, Lindon J.; Lodwick, Weldon American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 67, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.2307/1240681	journal	May 1985
A spatial model of climate change effects on yields and break-even prices of switchgrass and miscanthus in Ontario, Canada De Laporte, Aaron V.; Weersink, Alfons J.; McKenney, Daniel W. GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 6, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12058	journal	May 2013
Advanced breakeven analysis of agricultural enterprise budgets Dillon, C. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 9, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-5150(93)90008-Z	journal	August 1993
More Productive Than Maize in the Midwest: How Does Miscanthus Do It? Dohleman, Frank G.; Long, Stephen P. Plant Physiology, Vol. 150, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.139162	journal	June 2009
Rates of Return in the Farm and Nonfarm Sectors: How Do They Compare? Erickson, Kenneth W.; Moss, Charles B.; Mishra, Ashok K. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Vol. 36, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800027024	journal	December 2004
Risk, uncertainty, and learning in adoption of a crop innovation Ghadim, Amir K. Abadi; Pannell, David J.; Burton, Michael P. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 33, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2005.00433.x	journal	June 2005
Stochastic efficiency analysis with risk aversion bounds: a simplified approach Hardaker, J. Brian; Richardson, James W.; Lien, Gudbrand The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Vol. 48, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2004.00239.x	journal	June 2004
Miscanthus for Renewable Energy Generation: European Union Experience and Projections for Illinois Heaton, Emily A.; Clifton-Brown, John; Voigt, Thomas B. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Vol. 9, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MITI.0000038848.94134.be	journal	October 2004
Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus Heaton, Emily A.; Dohleman, Frank G.; Long, Stephen P. Global Change Biology, Vol. 14, Issue 9 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01662.x	journal	September 2008
An Axiomatic Approach to Measurable Utility Herstein, I. N.; Milnor, John Econometrica, Vol. 21, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.2307/1905540	journal	April 1953
An integrated biogeochemical and economic analysis of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States: BIOENERGY CROPS IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES Jain, Atul K.; Khanna, Madhu; Erickson, Matthew GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 2, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01041.x	journal	September 2010
Stochastic Structure, farm size and Technology Adoption in Developing Agriculture Just, Richard E.; Zilberman, David Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 35, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.oep.a041598	journal	July 1983
Profitability of Cellulosic Biomass Production in the Northern Great Lakes Region Kells, Bradley J.; Swinton, Scott M. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 106, Issue 2 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0397	journal	January 2014
Costs of producing miscanthus and switchgrass for bioenergy in Illinois Khanna, Madhu; Dhungana, Basanta; Clifton-Brown, John Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 32, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.11.003	journal	June 2008
Investment in site-specific crop management under uncertainty: implications for nitrogen pollution control and environmental policy Khanna, Madhu; Isik, Murat; Winter-Nelson, Alex Agricultural Economics, Vol. 24, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00089.x	journal	December 2000
An Interval Approach to Measuring Decision Maker Preferences King, Robert P.; Robison, Lindon J. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 63, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.2307/1240542	journal	August 1981
Technology Adoption under Production Uncertainty: Theory and Application to Irrigation Technology Koundouri, Phoebe; Nauges, Céline; Tzouvelekas, Vangelis American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 88, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8276.2006.00886.x	journal	August 2006
Comparative Breakeven Analysis of Annual Grain and Perennial Switchgrass Cropping Systems on Claypan Soil Landscapes Landers, Greg W.; Thompson, Allen L.; Kitchen, Newell R. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 104, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0229	journal	May 2012
The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the US and Europe Lewandowski, Iris; Scurlock, Jonathan M. O.; Lindvall, Eva Biomass and Bioenergy, Vol. 25, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(03)00030-8	journal	October 2003
The economics of risk, uncertainty and learning in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: where are we on the learning curve? Marra, Michele; Pannell, David J.; Abadi Ghadim, Amir Agricultural Systems, Vol. 75, Issue 2-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(02)00066-5	journal	February 2003
Yield and Breakeven Price of ‘Alamo’ Switchgrass for Biofuels in Tennessee Mooney, Daniel F.; Roberts, Roland K.; English, Burton C. Agronomy Journal, Vol. 101, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2009.0090	journal	January 2009
Impact of US Biofuel Policy in the Presence of Uncertain Climate Conditions Nuñez, Hector M.; Trujillo-Barrera, Andrés Biofuels, Vol. 5, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2014.999409	journal	September 2014
Investment decisions in hog finishing: an application of the real options approach Odening, Martin; Mußhoff, Oliver; Balmann, Alfons Agricultural Economics, Vol. 32, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0169-5150.2005.00004.x	journal	January 2005
Are we risking too much? Perspectives on risk in farm modeling Pannell, David J.; Malcolm, Bill; Kingwell, Ross S. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 23, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2000.tb00084.x	journal	June 2000
The effect of climatic variations on agricultural risk Parry, M. L.; Carter, T. R. Climatic Change, Vol. 7, Issue 1 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00139443	journal	March 1985
Investment under Uncertainty and Dynamic Adjustment in the Finnish Pork Industry Pietola, Kyösti S.; Myers, Robert J. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 82, Issue 4 https://doi.org/10.1111/0002-9092.00094	journal	November 2000
On Testing the Structure of Risk Preferences in Agricultural Supply Analysis Pope, Rulon D.; Just, Richard E. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 73, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.2307/1242826	journal	August 1991
Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large Pratt, John W. Econometrica, Vol. 32, Issue 1/2 https://doi.org/10.2307/1913738	journal	January 1964
Comparative productivity of alternative cellulosic bioenergy cropping systems in the North Central USA Sanford, Gregg R.; Oates, Lawrence G.; Jasrotia, Poonam Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, Vol. 216 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2015.10.018	journal	January 2016
The impact of water price uncertainty on the adoption of precision irrigation systems Schoengold, Karina; Sunding, David L. Agricultural Economics, Vol. 45, Issue 6 https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12118	journal	April 2014
Designing the emerging EU pesticide policy: A literature review Skevas, T.; Oude Lansink, A. G. J. M.; Stefanou, S. E. NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, Vol. 64-65 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2012.09.001	journal	September 2013
Switching to Perennial Energy Crops Under Uncertainty and Costly Reversibility Song, F.; Zhao, J.; Swinton, S. M. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Vol. 93, Issue 3 https://doi.org/10.1093/ajae/aar018	journal	April 2011
Uncertainty and investment in precision agriculture – Is it worth the money? Tozer, Peter R. Agricultural Systems, Vol. 100, Issue 1-3 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2009.02.001	journal	April 2009

Cited By (3)

A stochastic techno-economic analysis of shrub willow production using EcoWillow 3.0S: A Stochastic Techno-Economic Analysis of Shrub Willow Production Using EcoWillow 3.0S Frank, Jenny R.; Brown, Tristan R.; Volk, Timothy A. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, Vol. 12, Issue 5 https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1897	journal	June 2018
Diverse lignocellulosic feedstocks can achieve high field-scale ethanol yields while providing flexibility for the biorefinery and landscape-level environmental benefits Zhang, Yaoping; Oates, Lawrence G.; Serate, Jose GCB Bioenergy, Vol. 10, Issue 11 https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12533	journal	July 2018
Cellulosic biofuel contributions to a sustainable energy future: Choices and outcomes Robertson, G. Philip; Hamilton, Stephen K.; Barham, Bradford L. Science, Vol. 356, Issue 6345 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aal2324	journal	June 2017

Similar Records

Carbon mitigation payments can reduce the riskiness of bioenergy crop production

Journal Article · Tue Apr 18 00:00:00 EDT 2023 · Journal of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association (JAAEA) · OSTI ID:1363930

Majeed, Fahd; Khanna, Madhu; Miao, Ruiqing; +3 more

Economics of Crop Rotations With and Without Carinata for Sustainable Aviation Fuel Production in the SE United States

Journal Article · Tue May 10 00:00:00 EDT 2022 · Frontiers in Energy Research · OSTI ID:1363930

Karami, Omid; Dwivedi, Puneet; Lamb, Marshall; +1 more

Strategies for near-term scale-up of cellulosic biofuel production using sorghum and crop residues in the US

Journal Article · Fri Nov 23 00:00:00 EST 2018 · Environmental Research Letters · OSTI ID:1363930

Cui, Xinguang; Kavvada, Olga; Huntington, Tyler; +1 more

Related Subjects

09 BIOMASS FUELS
bioenergy
cellulosic biomass
energy crops
investment analysis
Monte Carlo simulation
risk
stochastic budgeting

Title: Investment risk in bioenergy crops

Citation Formats

References (39)

Cited By (3)

Similar Records

Related Subjects