An Analysis of the Costs, Benefits, and Implications of Different Approaches to Capturing the Value of Renewable Energy Tax Incentives
This report compares the relative costs, benefits, and implications of capturing the value of renewable energy tax benefits in these three different ways – applying them against outside income , carrying them forward in time until they can be fully absorbed internally, or monetizing them through third-party tax equity investors – to see which method is most competitive under various scenarios. It finds that under current law and late-2013 market conditions, monetization makes sense for all but the most tax-efficient project sponsors. In other words, for most project sponsors, bringing in third-party tax equity currently provides net benefits to a project.
- Research Organization:
- Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL), Berkeley, CA (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- Environmental Energy Technologies Division
- DOE Contract Number:
- DE-AC02-05CH11231
- OSTI ID:
- 1134230
- Report Number(s):
- LBNL-6610E
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Preliminary Evaluation of the Impact of the Section 1603 Treasury Grant Program on Renewable Energy Deployment in 2009
Final Technical Report_Clean Energy Program_SLC-SELF
A Review of Wind Project Financing Structures in the USA
Technical Report
·
Wed Mar 31 00:00:00 EDT 2010
·
OSTI ID:1134230
Final Technical Report_Clean Energy Program_SLC-SELF
Technical Report
·
Wed Jan 22 00:00:00 EST 2014
·
OSTI ID:1134230
A Review of Wind Project Financing Structures in the USA
Journal Article
·
Wed Sep 24 00:00:00 EDT 2008
· Wind Energy
·
OSTI ID:1134230