Comparative Analysis for the Chicago Energy Retrofit Project

Guzowski, L.; Muehleisen, R.; Heo, Y.; Graziano, D.

doi:10.2172/1130300

Title: Comparative Analysis for the Chicago Energy Retrofit Project

Full Record
Other Related Research

Authors:

Guzowski, L.; Muehleisen, R.; Heo, Y.; Graziano, D. ^[1]

Decision and Information Sciences

Publication Date:: Sat Apr 26 00:00:00 EDT 2014

Research Org.:: Argonne National Lab. (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)

Sponsoring Org.:: USDOE Office of Science (SC)

OSTI Identifier:: 1130300

Report Number(s):: ANL/DIS-14/2

DOE Contract Number:: DE-AC02-06CH11357

Resource Type:: Technical Report

Country of Publication:: United States

Language:: ENGLISH

Citation Formats


                    Guzowski, L., Muehleisen, R., Heo, Y., Graziano, D., and University of Cambridge). Comparative Analysis for the Chicago Energy Retrofit Project.  United States: N. p., 2014. 
        Web.  doi:10.2172/1130300.

Copy to clipboard


                    Guzowski, L., Muehleisen, R., Heo, Y., Graziano, D., & University of Cambridge). Comparative Analysis for the Chicago Energy Retrofit Project.  United States.  https://doi.org/10.2172/1130300

Copy to clipboard


                    Guzowski, L., Muehleisen, R., Heo, Y., Graziano, D., and University of Cambridge). 2014.  
        "Comparative Analysis for the Chicago Energy Retrofit Project".  United States.  https://doi.org/10.2172/1130300.  https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1130300.

Copy to clipboard


                    
@article{osti_1130300,

  title        = {Comparative Analysis for the Chicago Energy Retrofit Project},

  author       = {Guzowski, L. and Muehleisen, R. and Heo, Y. and Graziano, D. and University of Cambridge)},

  abstractNote = {},

  doi          = {10.2172/1130300},

  url          = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1130300},
  journal      = {},
number       = ,

  volume       = ,

  place        = {United States},

  year         = {Sat Apr 26 00:00:00 EDT 2014},

  month        = {Sat Apr 26 00:00:00 EDT 2014}

}

Copy to clipboard

Technical Report:

View Technical Report

https://doi.org/10.2172/1130300

Save / Share:

Export Metadata

Save to My Library

Similar records in OSTI.GOV collections:

District heating and cooling systems for communities through power plant retrofit and distribution network. Comparative energy analysis for the City of Piqua, Ohio

Technical Report

The City of Piqua, Ohio is currently considering the implementation of a community-scale District Heating System, based upon cogeneration and centered around the City's Municipal Power Plant and system located within the community. Results of a preliminary feasibility study indicate that the District Heating System as proposed would offer a substantial life-cycle economic benefit to the community as compared to maintaining the existing inventory of conventional energy supply systems and schemes. However, the issue at hand concerns the appropriate consideration of equivalent alternatives to District Heating. The investigation detailed within this report is constructed to evaluate appropriate alternatives, singly andmore »« less
A Meta-Analysis of Single-Family Deep Energy Retrofit Performance in the U.S.

Technical Report Less, Brennan; Walker, Iain

The current state of Deep Energy Retrofit (DER) performance in the U.S. has been assessed in 116 homes in the United States (US), using actual and simulated data gathered from the available domestic literature. Substantial airtightness reductions averaging 63% (n=48) were reported (two- to three-times more than in conventional retrofits), with average post-retrofit airtightness of 4.7 Air Changes per House at 50 Pascal (ACH50) (n=94). Yet, mechanical ventilation was not installed consistently. In order to avoid indoor air quality (IAQ) issues, all future DERs should comply with ASHRAE 62.2-2013 requirements or equivalent. Projects generally achieved good energy results, with averagemore »« less
https://doi.org/10.2172/1129577

Full Text Available
Solvent-based to waterbased adhesive-coated substrate retrofit. Volume 1. Comparative analysis. Final report, September 1994-October 1995

Technical Report McMinn, B; Snow, W; Bowman, D

This volume represents the analysis of case study facilities` experience with waterbased adhesive use and retrofit requirements. Chapter 2 describes the information-collection phase used to screen out facilities most appropriate for case study visits. Chapter 3 contains the methodology used for site visits and briefly summarizes each case study site visit. Chapter 4 details the comparative analysis results of the case study site visits in conjunction with additional information obtained from other sources in the industry. Chapter 5 summarizes the comparative analyses described in Chapter 4. Chapter 6 describes information obtained during the case study site visits and from othermore »« less
Comparative Analysis of Modeling Studies on China's Future Energy and Emissions Outlook

Technical Report Zheng, Nina; Zhou, Nan; Fridley, David

The past decade has seen the development of various scenarios describing long-term patterns of future Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions, with each new approach adding insights to our understanding of the changing dynamics of energy consumption and aggregate future energy trends. With the recent growing focus on China's energy use and emission mitigation potential, a range of Chinese outlook models have been developed across different institutions including in China's Energy Research Institute's 2050 China Energy and CO2 Emissions Report, McKinsey & Co's China's Green Revolution report, the UK Sussex Energy Group and Tyndall Centre's China's Energy Transition report, and the China-specificmore »« less
https://doi.org/10.2172/994012

Full Text Available
Chapter 8: Whole-Building Retrofit with Consumption Data Analysis Evaluation Protocol. The Uniform Methods Project: Methods for Determining Energy Efficiency Savings for Specific Measures

Technical Report Kurnik, Charles; Agnew, Ken; Goldberg, Mimi

Whole-building retrofits involve the installation of multiple measures. Whole-building retrofit programs take many forms. With a focus on overall building performance, these programs usually begin with an energy audit to identify cost-effective energy efficiency measures for the home. Measures are then installed, either at no cost to the homeowner or partially paid for by rebates and/or financing. The methods described here may also be applied to evaluation of single-measure retrofit programs. Related methods exist for replace-on-failure programs and for new construction, but are not the subject of this chapter.
https://doi.org/10.2172/1407847

Full Text Available

Similar Records