Thermoeconomic design optimization of a KRW-based IGCC power plant. Final report
- Tennessee Technological Univ., Cookeville, TN (United States). Center for Electric Power
This report discussed the cost and efficiency optimization of an integrated gasification-combined-cycle (IGCC) power plant design and the effects of important design options and parameters. Advanced thermoeconomic techniques were used to evaluate and optimize a given IGCC concept which uses Illinois No. 6 bituminous coal, air-blown KRW coal gasifiers, a hot gas cleanup system, and GE MS7001F gas turbines. Three optimal design concepts are presented and discussed in the report. Two of the concepts are characterized by minimum cost of electricity at two different values of the steam high pressure. The third concept represents the thermodynamic optimum. This study identified several differences between the original design and the design of the optimized cases. Compared with the original concept, significant annual savings are achieved in the cost optimal cases. Comparisons were made between results obtained using both the old and the new performance data for the MS7001F gas turbine. This report discusses the effects of gasification temperature, steam high pressure, coal moisture, and various design options on the overall plant efficiency and cost of electricity. Cost sensitivity studies were conducted and recommendations for future studies were made.
- Research Organization:
- Southern Co. Services, Inc., Birmingham, AL (United States). Research and Environmental Affairs Dept.; Tennessee Technological Univ., Cookeville, TN (United States). Center for Electric Power
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)
- DOE Contract Number:
- FC21-89MC26019
- OSTI ID:
- 10143708
- Report Number(s):
- DOE/MC/26019-3070; ON: DE92001255
- Resource Relation:
- Other Information: PBD: Nov 1991
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Exergoeconomic evaluation of a KRW-based IGCC power plant
Exergetic comparison of two KRW-based IGCC power plants