U.S. Department of EnergyOffice of Scientific and Technical Information
Proposed Tenaska Washington II Generation Project : Final Environmental Impact Statement: Summary.
Abstract
BPA is considering whether to purchase electrical power from a proposed privately-owned combustion-turbine electrical generation plant in Washington. The plant would be fired by natural gas and would use combined-cycle technology to generate 240 average megawatts (aMW) of energy. The plant would be developed, owned, and operated by Tenaska Washington Partners II, L.P. The project would be located about 19 kilometers (12 miles) southeast of downtown Tacoma in the Frederickson Industrial Area, Pierce County. The proposed plant would occupy about half of a 6.4-hectare (16-acre) parcel and would be consistent with the industrial character of its surroundings. The proposed site is currently undeveloped and zoned for industrial use by the county. Main environmental concerns identified in the scoping process and in comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) include: (1) potential air quality impacts, such as emissions and their contribution to the {open_quotes}greenhouse{close_quotes} effect; (2) potential health and safety impacts, such as nuisance odors, plant safety, visibility and heat-emission systems which may affect low-flying planes and potential health effects of electric and magnetic fields; and (3) potential water quality and quantity impacts, such as the amount of wastewater to be discharged, the source and amount of water required formore »
- Authors:
- Publication Date:
- Research Org.:
- BPA (Bonneville Power Administration (BPA), Portland, OR)
- Sponsoring Org.:
- USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)
- OSTI Identifier:
- 10129541
- Report Number(s):
- DOE/BP-2283; DOE/EIS-0194
ON: DE94007588; NC: NONE; TRN: 94:003247
- Resource Type:
- Technical Report
- Resource Relation:
- Other Information: PBD: Jan 1994
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
- Subject:
- 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES; COMBINED-CYCLE POWER PLANTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS; POWER GENERATION; PUBLIC HEALTH; Electric power production - Washington (State) - Planning; 200500; 540150; 540250; 540350; ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS; SITE RESOURCE AND USE STUDIES
Citation Formats
United States. Bonneville Power Administration. Proposed Tenaska Washington II Generation Project : Final Environmental Impact Statement: Summary.. United States: N. p., 1994.
Web. doi:10.2172/10129541.
United States. Bonneville Power Administration. Proposed Tenaska Washington II Generation Project : Final Environmental Impact Statement: Summary.. United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/10129541
United States. Bonneville Power Administration. 1994.
"Proposed Tenaska Washington II Generation Project : Final Environmental Impact Statement: Summary.". United States. https://doi.org/10.2172/10129541. https://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/10129541.
@article{osti_10129541,
title = {Proposed Tenaska Washington II Generation Project : Final Environmental Impact Statement: Summary.},
author = {United States. Bonneville Power Administration.},
abstractNote = {BPA is considering whether to purchase electrical power from a proposed privately-owned combustion-turbine electrical generation plant in Washington. The plant would be fired by natural gas and would use combined-cycle technology to generate 240 average megawatts (aMW) of energy. The plant would be developed, owned, and operated by Tenaska Washington Partners II, L.P. The project would be located about 19 kilometers (12 miles) southeast of downtown Tacoma in the Frederickson Industrial Area, Pierce County. The proposed plant would occupy about half of a 6.4-hectare (16-acre) parcel and would be consistent with the industrial character of its surroundings. The proposed site is currently undeveloped and zoned for industrial use by the county. Main environmental concerns identified in the scoping process and in comments on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) include: (1) potential air quality impacts, such as emissions and their contribution to the {open_quotes}greenhouse{close_quotes} effect; (2) potential health and safety impacts, such as nuisance odors, plant safety, visibility and heat-emission systems which may affect low-flying planes and potential health effects of electric and magnetic fields; and (3) potential water quality and quantity impacts, such as the amount of wastewater to be discharged, the source and amount of water required for plant operation. These and other issues are discussed in detail in the EIS. The proposed project already includes many features designed to reduce environmental impacts. Based on investigations performed for the EIS, no significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts associated with the proposed project were identified, and no evidence emerged to suggest that the proposed action is controversial. The EIS is being mailed to numerous agencies, groups, and individuals (see Section 8.0). There will be a 30-day no-action period before any decisions are made and the Record of Decision is signed.},
doi = {10.2172/10129541},
url = {https://www.osti.gov/biblio/10129541},
journal = {},
number = ,
volume = ,
place = {United States},
year = {Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1994},
month = {Sat Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1994}
}