skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Consistency and synthesis of Pacific Ocean CO2 survey data

Journal Article · · Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography
OSTI ID:986436
 [1];  [2];  [1];  [3];  [4];  [1];  [5];  [6];  [3];  [7];  [1];  [1];  [8];  [9];  [10];  [11];  [10];  [12];  [13];  [10] more »;  [14];  [15];  [16];  [9];  [17];  [18];  [19];  [20] « less
  1. NOAA Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory
  2. NOAA, Seattle, WA
  3. Atlantic Oceanographic & Meteorological Laboratory, NOAA
  4. Princeton University
  5. University of Miami
  6. Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang, Republic of Korea
  7. ORNL
  8. Department of Marine Science, USF
  9. Columbia University
  10. University of California, San Diego
  11. Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI), Woods Hole, MA
  12. Meteorological Research Institute, Japan
  13. Brookhaven National Laboratory (BNL)/U.S. Department of Energy
  14. Frontier Research System for Global Change/Institute for Global Change Research, Japan
  15. Central Research Institute of Electric Power Industry, Japan
  16. CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research
  17. IFM-GEOMAR, Leibniz Institute for Marine Sciences, Chemical Oceanography, Kiel, Germany
  18. National Institute for Resources and Environment, Japan
  19. University of Hawaii
  20. Institute of Ocean Sciences, Climate Chemistry Laboratory, Sidney, BC Canada

Between 1991 and 1999, carbon measurements were made on twenty-five WOCE/JGOFS/OACES cruises in the Pacific Ocean. Investigators from 15 different laboratories and four countries analyzed at least two of the four measurable ocean carbon parameters (DIC, TAlk, fCO2, and pH) on almost all cruises. The goal of this work is to assess the quality of the Pacific carbon survey data and to make recommendations for generating a unified data set that is consistent between cruises. Several different lines of evidence were used to examine the consistency, including comparison of calibration techniques, results from certified reference material analyses, precision of at-sea replicate analyses, agreement between shipboard analyses and replicate shore based analyses, comparison of deep water values at locations where two or more cruises overlapped or crossed, consistency with other hydrographic parameters, and internal consistency with multiple carbon parameter measurements. With the adjustments proposed here, the data can be combined to generate a Pacific Ocean data set, with over 36,000 unique sample locations analyzed for at least two carbon parameters in most cases. The best data coverage was for DIC, which has an estimated overall accuracy of ~3 umol/kg. TAlk, the second most common carbon parameter analyzed, had an estimated overall accuracy of ~5 umol/kg. To obtain additional details on this study, including detailed crossover plots and information on the availability of the compiled, adjusted data set, visit the Global Data Analysis Project web site at: http://cdiac.ornl.gov/oceans/glodap.

Research Organization:
Oak Ridge National Lab. (ORNL), Oak Ridge, TN (United States)
Sponsoring Organization:
USDOE Office of Science (SC)
DOE Contract Number:
DE-AC05-00OR22725
OSTI ID:
986436
Journal Information:
Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography, Journal Issue: 49
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English