Nuclear energy is necessary in New England
In New England, in the early 1970's, nuclear power was selected by the utilities as the most-economical method of power generation for the region, and detailed plans were developed, including plant sites and an industrial infrastructure. In 1970 it was expected that, by 1980, 45.5% of electrical-generating capacity in New England would be nuclear. In 1980, only 20% of electrical generating capacity and 35% of electrical production are nuclear. In 1980, New England used oil for 60% of its electricity generation: 80% of that oil (48% of the electricity generated) is foreign oil, and none of the oil is indigenous to New England. New England would therefore have to use 48% less electricity if a serious oil embargo were imposed and no other adjustments were made. The cost figures for one company, Boston Edison, illustrate the cost of oil-generated electricity. Pilgrim I, a nuclear power plant completed 12/72, with a nameplate capacity of 670 MWe, now supplies about 38% of the needs of the customers of Boston Edison. The busbar costs (the cost of power at the point of production, before it is distributed) from this plant quoted to the Public Utility Commission are currently (1980) 1.7 cents per kWh and constant. The rest of Boston Edison's power is derived from oil-fired plants at a busbar cost of 3.7 cents per kWh and is rising rapidly.
- Research Organization:
- Harvard Univ., Cambridge, MA
- OSTI ID:
- 7095023
- Journal Information:
- Energy (Stamford, Conn.); (United States), Vol. 6:4
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Economics of nuclear power in Finland
New England utilities drop opposition to Dickey Dam
Related Subjects
29 ENERGY PLANNING
POLICY AND ECONOMY
NUCLEAR POWER
COST
USA
NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS
NORTH AMERICA
NUCLEAR FACILITIES
POWER
POWER PLANTS
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
210800* - Nuclear Power Plants- Economics
290600 - Energy Planning & Policy- Nuclear Energy