Prediction of failure behavior of a welded pressure vessel containing flaws during a hydrogen-charged burst test
- Powertech Labs Inc., Surrey, British Columbia (Canada)
- BP-Amoco, Calgary, Alberta (Canada)
- CANMET, Ottawa, Ontario (Canada). Metals Technology Labs.
- Mobil Technology Co., Dallas, TX (United States)
- Praxair, Inc., Tonawanda, NY (United States)
An industry-government collaborative program was carried out with an aim to promoting the acceptance of fracture mechanics-based fitness-for-service assessment methodology for a service-damaged pressure vessel. A collaborative round robin exercise was carried out to predict the fracture behavior of a vessel containing hydrogen damage, fabrication-related lack-of-fusion defects, an artificially induced fatigue crack, and a localized thinned area. The fracture assessment procedures used include the US ASME Material Property Council`s PREFIS Program based on the British Standard (BS) Published Document (PD) 6493, ASME Section XI and The Central Electricity Generating Board (CEGB) R6 approach, The Welding Institute (TWI) CRACKWISE program (based on BS PD6493 Level 2 approach), a variant of the R6 approach, J-tearing instability approaches, various J-estimation schemes, LEFM approach, and simplified stress analysis. Assessments were compared with the results obtained from a hydrogen-charged burst test of the vessel. Predictions, based on the J-tearing approach, compared well with the actual burst test results. Actual burst pressure was about five times the operating pressure.
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE
- OSTI ID:
- 687520
- Journal Information:
- Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Vol. 121, Issue 3; Other Information: DN: Paper presented at the Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, July 21--26, 1996, Montreal, Quebec (CA); PBD: Aug 1999
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Evaluation of flaws in ferritic piping: ASME Code Appendix J, Deformation Plasticity Failure Assessment Diagram (DPFAD)
Development of J-integral based UT flaw acceptance criteria for Savannah River reactor tanks