skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Pitfalls and considerations in obtaining state commission approval for injection projects

Conference · · AAPG Bulletin (American Association of Petroleum Geologists); (United States)
OSTI ID:6681577
 [1]
  1. VanCott, Bagley, Cornwall McCarthy, Salt Lake City, UT (United States)

Attractive economics and technological advances have helped stimulate interest in enhanced-recovery projects. In most Rocky Mountain states, underground fluid-injection projects must be approved by an oil and gas commission or board in accordance with statutes or administrative regulations. Frequently, petroleum geologists and reservoir engineers present the factual basis supporting the injection project by testifying as expert witnesses during administrative proceedings. Many injection projects are operated by independents who may have limited experience in preparing for such hearings. Obtaining proper jurisdiction and establishing an adequate factual record is critical. Failure to do so may preclude obtaining approval from the commission or subject such approval to attack on appeal. Faulty legal compliance may jeopardize such projects. Accordingly, legal counsel should be consulted during the preparation of the application, testimony, and exhibits. Formal rules often are replaced during administrative proceedings and improper objections to projects are relatively common. Whereas some objections may be raised by competitors, many improper objections to projects are raised by surface landowners who attempt to use their objections as a negotiating tactic to obtain favorable surface-access agreements from operators. Although oil and gas commissions typically lack legal authority to resolve surface-access disputes, nevertheless, in the interest of furthering the appearance of fairness, they commonly permit surface landowners to state their objections during hearings. Operators should be prepared to protect their interests on the record and not allow such objections to sidetrack their efforts to obtain approval of their injection projects.

OSTI ID:
6681577
Report Number(s):
CONF-930947-; CODEN: AABUD2
Journal Information:
AAPG Bulletin (American Association of Petroleum Geologists); (United States), Vol. 77:8; Conference: Rocky Mountain section meeting of the American Association of Petroleum Geologists (AAPG), Salt Lake City, UT (United States), 12-15 Sep 1993; ISSN 0149-1423
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English