skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The {ital Energy Interaction Model}: A promising new methodology for projecting GPHS-RTG cladding failures, release amounts & respirable release fractions for postulated pre-launch, launch, and post-reentry earth impact accidents

Journal Article · · AIP Conference Proceedings
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.54959· OSTI ID:664644
 [1];  [2];  [3]
  1. James R. Coleman Consulting, P.O. Box 385, Cross, South Carolina 29436-0385 (United States)
  2. Sholtis Engineering Safety Consulting, P.O. Box 910, Tijeras, New Mexico 87059-0910 (United States)
  3. Sandia National Laboratories, P.O. Box 5800, M/S 0405, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87185-0405 (United States)

Safety analyses and evaluations must be scrutable, defensible, and credible. This is particularly true when nuclear systems are involved, with their attendant potential for releases of radioactive materials (source terms) to the unrestricted environment. Analytical projections of General Purpose Heat Source Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (GPHS-RTG) source terms, for safety analyses conducted to date, have relied upon generic data correlations using a single parameter of cladding damage, termed {open_quotes}distortion.{close_quotes} However, distortion is not an unequivocal measure of cladding insult, failure, or release. Furthermore, the analytical foundation, applicability, and broad use of distortion are argumentative and, thus, somewhat troublesome. In an attempt to avoid the complications associated with the use of distortion, a new methodology, referred to as the {ital Energy Interaction Model (EIM)}, has been preliminarily developed. This new methodology is based upon the physical principles of energy and energy exchange during mechanical interactions. Specifically, the {ital EIM} considers the energy imparted to GPHS-RTG components (bare fueled clads, GPHS modules, and full GPHS-RTGs) when exposed to mechanical threats (blast/overpressure, shrapnel and fragment impacts, and Earth surface impacts) posed by the full range of potential accidents. Expected forms are developed for equations intended to project cladding failure probabilities, the number of cladding failures expected, release amounts, and the fraction released as respirable particles. The coefficients of the equations developed are then set to fit the GPHS-RTG test data, ensuring good agreement with the experimental database. This assured, fitted agreement with the test database, along with the foundation of the {ital EIM} in first principles, provides confidence in the model{close_quote}s projections beyond the available database. In summary, the newly developed {ital EIM} methodology is described and discussed. The conclusions reached are that the {ital EIM} holds great promise as a predictive analytical tool for future GPHS-RTG safety assessments, and this promise can become a reality in the near future{emdash}given a modest level of advancement and refinement. {copyright} {ital 1998 American Institute of Physics.}

OSTI ID:
664644
Report Number(s):
CONF-980103-; ISSN 0094-243X; TRN: 98:011599
Journal Information:
AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 420, Issue 1; Conference: Space technology and applications international forum, Albuquerque, NM (United States), 25-29 Jan 1998; Other Information: PBD: Jan 1998
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

Response of the GPHS/RTG system to potential launch accident environments
Journal Article · Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1998 · AIP Conference Proceedings · OSTI ID:664644

GPHS-RTG launch accident analysis for Galileo and Ulysses
Conference · Tue Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 1991 · AIP Conference Proceedings (American Institute of Physics); (USA) · OSTI ID:664644

An assessment of the response of the GPHS-RTG to potential accident environments
Journal Article · Fri Jan 20 00:00:00 EST 1995 · AIP Conference Proceedings · OSTI ID:664644