skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: Preseismic and coseismic magnetic field measurements near the Coyote Lake, California, earthquake of August 6, 1979

Journal Article · · J. Geophys. Res.; (United States)

The epicenter of the Coyote Lake earthquake (M/sub L/ = 5.9 +- 0.2) of August 6, 1979, is located within an array of recording magnetometers which has been in operation since 1974. The nearest instrument, COY, was within 5 km of the epicenter. It was installed in October 1978 and is located on sedimentary rock, although volcanic and ultramafic rocks with magnetizations of up to 1 A/m outcrop 2 km to the west. A second recording magnetometer was operated for 18 days, beginning 4 days after the main event, to record the latter stages of the aftershock activity. Although longer-term magnetic field variations were recorded at station COY early in 1979 relative to other sites in the area, no anomalous changes within the two months prior to the earthquake were obeserved outside the present measurement uncertainty of 0.8 nT for hourly average differences. During the late aftershock stage, no magnetic field change greater than 0.25 nT occurred for more than a day. We conclude that in contrast to the 2-nT change observed before a previous M = 5.2 earthquake near Hollister, California, no demonstrable preseismic, coseismic, or postseismic tectonomagnetic effect was detected. A reasonable seismomagnetic model of the earthquake indicates that station COY was poorly located to detect stress-generated magnetic perturbations from this earthquake. Using a magnetization distribution indicated by modeling the aeromagnetic data over the area, we have calculated that homogeneous shear stress changes of about 5 MPa or greater would have been necessary to produce any observable effect at COY. This change is stress is precluded by geodetic data from over the area. However, COY is ideally situated for detection of electrokinetically generated magnetic anomalies. This initial null observation indicates that the assumptions used in the calculation of electrokinetic effects have, in this case, not been satisfied.

Research Organization:
U.S. Geological Survey, Menlo Park, California 94025
OSTI ID:
6494990
Journal Information:
J. Geophys. Res.; (United States), Vol. 86:B2
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

November 29, 1978 Oaxaca, Mexico, earthquake: A large simple event
Journal Article · Wed Jun 10 00:00:00 EDT 1981 · J. Geophys. Res.; (United States) · OSTI ID:6494990

Aftershock sequence of the 2011 Virginia earthquake derived from the dense AIDA array and backprojection
Journal Article · Sun Apr 01 00:00:00 EDT 2018 · Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America · OSTI ID:6494990

Seismomagnetic effect generated by the October 18, 1989, M sub L 7. 1 Loma Prieta, California, earthquake
Journal Article · Sun Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 1990 · Geophysical Research Letters (American Geophysical Union); (USA) · OSTI ID:6494990