Case for US participation in NATO multinational corps. Final report

Technical Report · Fri Oct 05 00:00:00 EDT 1990

OSTI ID:5901941

Young, T D; Lowe, K H

The massive political changes underway in Europe have necessitated a rethinking of U.S. strategy and force structure in NATO. Two guiding requirements are clear. First, the Federal Republic of Germany must lose its characterization of singularization brought on by the presence of a sizeable number of allied forces stationed on its soil. Second, it is absolutely imperative that the U.S. Army remain stationed in Europe in order to guard against residual Soviet military threats and assuage Bonn's neighbors of its continued benign external intentions. The solution to both challenges is the organization of multinational corps in NATO in the Allied Forces Central Europe (AFCENT) command area, accompanied by the abolishment of CENTAG and NORTHAG with multinational corps reporting directly to AFCENT. This study describes the political rationales for the creation of multinational corps in NATO, and presents a national corps structure for the AFCENT region. It also argues the case for the organization of special functional multinational corps to meet future European and U.S. security requirements.

• Research Organization: Army War Coll., Carlisle Barracks, PA (USA). Strategic Studies Inst.
• OSTI ID: 5901941
• Report Number(s): AD-A-229099/7/XAB
• Country of Publication: United States
• Language: English

Related Subjects

98 NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT, SAFEGUARDS, AND PHYSICAL PROTECTION
USA
MILITARY STRATEGY
ARMS CONTROL
EUROPE
FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
MULTINATIONAL ENTERPRISES
NATO
POLITICAL ASPECTS
PROGRESS REPORT
RISK ASSESSMENT
SECURITY
US DOD
USSR
ASIA
DOCUMENT TYPES
EASTERN EUROPE
INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
NORTH AMERICA
US ORGANIZATIONS
WESTERN EUROPE
350100* - Arms Control- Policy
Negotiations
& Legislation- (1987-)