Fairness hypothesis and managing the risks of societal technology choices
Much of the literature on risk perception and management has asked how society should resolve the question, ''How safe is safe enough'' There has been political and technical disagreement over the types of answers that may be given, as well as over the social values attached to perceived probabilities and magnitudes of various outcomes. Despite controversy, there seems to have been a large measure of consensus that, ''How safe is safe enough'' is the right question to ask. This paper sets out to question that assumption. Various ingenious techniques of risk analysis have sought to discover the real risks inherent in various activities, but from a sociocultural viewpoint it can be seen that no single answer can be given to the problem of adequate safety in a complex society which contains a wide variety of perceptual biases about danger, expectations of the good life, and levels of demand for safety. The paper argues that, from a societal risk-management perspective, we should be addressing a different range of questions that views societal risk as a whole rather than as the sum of individual hazards. Resolving the question, ''How safe is safe enough'' is less important in making societal technology choices than ''How fair is safe enough.'' A recent empirical pilot study is reported which explored the fairness hypotheses in the context of nuclear power. The results indicate that the process of technology choice should recognize explicitly the preferred principles different parties hold with respect to obtaining consent from those affected by the risks, distributing the liabilities, and justifying trust in the relevant institutions. The paper closes with a discussion of future prospects for the fairness approach in areas such as noxious facility siting.
- Research Organization:
- Oak Ridge National Lab., TN (USA)
- DOE Contract Number:
- AC05-84OR21400
- OSTI ID:
- 5120169
- Report Number(s):
- CONF-861211-11; ON: DE87000363
- Resource Relation:
- Conference: American Society of Mechanical Engineers winter meeting, Anaheim, CA, USA, 7 Dec 1986
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
Role of liability preferences in societal technology choices: results of a pilot study
How fair is safe enough. The cultural approach to societal technology choice
Related Subjects
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS//MATHEMATICS, COMPUTING, AND INFORMATION SCIENCE
29 ENERGY PLANNING
POLICY AND ECONOMY
NUCLEAR ENERGY
RISK ASSESSMENT
SAFETY
DECISION MAKING
PUBLIC OPINION
SOCIO-ECONOMIC FACTORS
ENERGY
INSTITUTIONAL FACTORS
054000* - Nuclear Fuels- Health & Safety
570000 - Health & Safety
290300 - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment
Health
& Safety
290600 - Energy Planning & Policy- Nuclear Energy