skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: The linear hypothesis - an idea whose time has passed

Journal Article · · Transactions of the American Nuclear Society
OSTI ID:411514
 [1]
  1. Idaho National Engineering Laboratory, Idaho Falls, ID (United States)

The linear no-threshold hypothesis is the basis for radiation protection standards in the United States. In the words of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP), the hypothesis is: {open_quotes}In the interest of estimating effects in humans conservatively, it is not unreasonable to follow the assumption of a linear relationship between dose and effect in the low dose regions for which direct observational data are not available.{close_quotes} The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) stated the hypothesis in a slightly different manner: {open_quotes}One such basic assumption ... is that ... there is ... a linear relationship without threshold between dose and the probability of an effect. The hypothesis was necessary 50 yr ago when it was first enunciated because the dose-effect curve for ionizing radiation for effects in humans was not known. The ICRP and NCRP needed a model to extrapolate high-dose effects to low-dose effects. So the linear no-threshold hypothesis was born. Certain details of the history of the development and use of the linear hypothesis are presented. In particular, use of the hypothesis by the U.S. regulatory agencies is examined. Over time, the sense of the hypothesis has been corrupted. The corruption of the hypothesis into the current paradigm of {open_quote}a little radiation, no matter how small, can and will harm you{close_quotes} is presented. The reasons the corruption occurred are proposed. The effects of the corruption are enumerated, specifically, the use of the corruption by the antinuclear forces in the United States and some of the huge costs to U.S. taxpayers due to the corruption. An alternative basis for radiation protection standards to assure public safety, based on the weight of scientific evidence on radiation health effects, is proposed.

OSTI ID:
411514
Report Number(s):
CONF-951006-; ISSN 0003-018X; TRN: 97:000767
Journal Information:
Transactions of the American Nuclear Society, Vol. 73; Conference: Winter meeting of the American Nuclear Society (ANS), San Francisco, CA (United States), 29 Oct - 1 Nov 1995; Other Information: PBD: 1995
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

The linear hypothesis: An idea whose time has passed
Conference · Fri Dec 01 00:00:00 EST 1995 · OSTI ID:411514

Collective dose: Dogma, tool, or trauma?
Journal Article · Tue Dec 31 00:00:00 EST 1996 · Transactions of the American Nuclear Society · OSTI ID:411514

Relationship between kidney burden and radiation dose from chronic ingestion of U: Implications for radiation standards for the public
Journal Article · Sat Jul 01 00:00:00 EDT 1989 · Health Phys.; (United States) · OSTI ID:411514