When can carbon abatement policies increase welfare? The fundamental role of distorted factor markets
- Resources for the Future, Washington, DC (United States)
- Stanford Univ., CA (United States)
This paper employs analytical and numerical models to assess the welfare effects of a revenue-neutral carbon tax and (nonauctioned) carbon emissions permits, taking into account preexisting tax distortions in factor markets. The presence of preexisting taxes significantly raises the general equilibrium costs of both policies. This cost increase is much greater under emissions permits, since this policy does not generate revenues to reduce distortionary taxes. Under the central estimates emissions permits cannot increase welfare unless environmental damages exceed about $18 per ton of carbon. In contrast, an appropriately scaled carbon tax is welfare-improving so long as environmental damages are positive.
- Sponsoring Organization:
- National Science Foundation, Washington, DC (United States)
- OSTI ID:
- 318611
- Journal Information:
- Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 37, Issue 1; Other Information: PBD: Jan 1999
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Similar Records
The long-term impacts of carbon and variable renewable energy policies on electricity markets
Quantifying policy gaps for achieving the net-zero GHG emissions target in the U.S. light-duty vehicle market through electrification