skip to main content
OSTI.GOV title logo U.S. Department of Energy
Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Title: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE SUPERNOVA LEGACY SURVEY SAMPLE WITH ΛCDM AND THE R{sub h}=ct UNIVERSE

Journal Article · · Astronomical Journal (Online)
; ;  [1]
  1. Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210008 (China)

The use of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) has thus far produced the most reliable measurement of the expansion history of the universe, suggesting that ΛCDM offers the best explanation for the redshift–luminosity distribution observed in these events. However, analysis of other kinds of sources, such as cosmic chronometers, gamma-ray bursts, and high-z quasars, conflicts with this conclusion, indicating instead that the constant expansion rate implied by the R{sub h} = ct universe is a better fit to the data. The central difficulty with the use of SNe Ia as standard candles is that one must optimize three or four nuisance parameters characterizing supernova (SN) luminosities simultaneously with the parameters of an expansion model. Hence, in comparing competing models, one must reduce the data independently for each. We carry out such a comparison of ΛCDM and the R{sub h} = ct universe using the SN Legacy Survey sample of 252 SN events, and show that each model fits its individually reduced data very well. However, since R{sub h} = ct has only one free parameter (the Hubble constant), it follows from a standard model selection technique that it is to be preferred over ΛCDM, the minimalist version of which has three (the Hubble constant, the scaled matter density, and either the spatial curvature constant or the dark energy equation-of-state parameter). We estimate using the Bayes Information Criterion that in a pairwise comparison, the likelihood of R{sub h} = ct is ∼90%, compared with only ∼10% for a minimalist form of ΛCDM, in which dark energy is simply a cosmological constant. Compared to R{sub h} = ct, versions of the standard model with more elaborate parametrizations of dark energy are judged to be even less likely.

OSTI ID:
22520194
Journal Information:
Astronomical Journal (Online), Vol. 149, Issue 3; Other Information: Country of input: International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA); ISSN 1538-3881
Country of Publication:
United States
Language:
English

Similar Records

A TEST OF COSMOLOGICAL MODELS USING HIGH-z MEASUREMENTS OF H(z)
Journal Article · Thu Oct 15 00:00:00 EDT 2015 · Astronomical Journal (Online) · OSTI ID:22520194

The high-z quasar Hubble Diagram
Journal Article · Wed Jan 01 00:00:00 EST 2014 · Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics · OSTI ID:22520194

Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters
Journal Article · Fri Sep 11 00:00:00 EDT 2020 · Astronomy and Astrophysics · OSTI ID:22520194